Literature DB >> 24297583

How to improve MRI accuracy in detecting deep infiltrating colorectal endometriosis: MRI findings vs. laparoscopy and histopathology.

Anna Lia Valentini1, Benedetta Gui, Maura Miccò, Maria Carla Mingote, Valeria Ninivaggi, Maurizio Guido, Gian Franco Zannoni, Eleonora Marrucci, Lorenzo Bonomo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To verify whether the capability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing deep infiltrating colorectal endometriosis (DICE) is improved using an association of MRI findings. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The imaging database of our Institute of Radiology was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients subjected to MRI for a suspicion of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Medical history was then investigated and only patients who were also subjected to laparoscopy (LA) were included. Absence of LA represented the exclusion criterion. Images were evaluated twice by two radiologists using two different diagnostic criteria for an abnormal result: the contemporary presence of nodules or hypointense plaque-like lesions in the adjacent fat plane and bowel wall thickness, without (first criterion) or with (second criterion) semicircular shape (i.e. "radial and retracting shape"). Radiologists worked in consensus evaluating images in two separate sessions, using the first criterion in the first section and the second criterion in the second one. MRI results were compared with LA or histopathology as the gold standard by 2 × 2 tables and statistically analyzed (k statistics). Likelihood-ratio test was also performed, being independent from the prevalence of the disease.
RESULTS: By consulting case sheets, 33/50 females (ranging age 24-39 years, mean age 32.2 years) who were subjected to MRI also underwent LA. Intestinal resection for DICE was performed in 11/33 patients; in 22/33 superficial intestinal foci, adhesions/nodules in the fat plane were simply removed. When the first criterion was applied, MRI agreement with histopathology or LA was poor (51.5 %) (k value = 0.20; p < 0.055), while it was improved (96.9 %) when using the second diagnostic criterion (k value = 0.93; p < 0.0000). Likelihood ratio was 1.375 (95 % CI 0.69-2.72) using the first and 22 (95 % CI 20.08-24.1) using the second criterion.
CONCLUSION: The second criterion, or the joint presence of nodules or hypointense plaque-like lesions in the adjacent fat plane and bowel wall thickness showing "radial and retracting shape", improves MRI capability in DICE diagnosis. It can be considered an effective indicator of DICE on T2-weighted images at 1.5-T MRI, and can ensure the correct preoperative assessment of the disease for the best therapeutic procedure and treatment planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24297583     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-013-0336-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of colonic involvement in endometriosis: double-contrast barium enema vs. magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  N Faccioli; G Foti; R Manfredi; P Mainardi; E Spoto; G Ruffo; L Minelli; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2009-06-30

2.  Preoperative assessment of intestinal endometriosis: A comparison of transvaginal sonography with water-contrast in the rectum, transrectal sonography, and barium enema.

Authors:  Valentino Bergamini; Fabio Ghezzi; Stefano Scarperi; Ricciarda Raffaelli; Antonella Cromi; Massimo Franchi
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2010-12

Review 3.  Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging.

Authors:  Leonardo Marcal; Maria Angela Nothaft; Francisco Coelho; Haesun Choi
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2010-12

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging in women with pelvic pain from gynaecological causes: a pictorial review.

Authors:  A L Valentini; B Gui; R Basilico; I V Di Molfetta; M Miccò; L Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Deep pelvic endometriosis: limited additional diagnostic value of postcontrast in comparison with conventional MR images.

Authors:  Marc Bazot; Adeline Gasner; Clarisse Lafont; Marcos Ballester; Emile Daraï
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Diagnosis of colorectal endometriosis: contribution of contrast enhanced MR-colonography.

Authors:  Arnaldo Scardapane; Stefano Bettocchi; Filomenamila Lorusso; Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora; Antonella Vimercati; Oronzo Ceci; Maurilia Lasciarrea; Giuseppe Angelelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Deep rectosigmoid endometriosis: "mushroom cap" sign on T2-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Jung Hwan Yoon; Dongil Choi; Kee-Taek Jang; Chan Kyo Kim; Heejung Kim; Soon Jin Lee; Ho-Kyung Chun; Woo Yong Lee; Seong Hyeon Yun
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2010-12

Review 8.  Bowel endometriosis: presentation, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Valentino Remorgida; Simone Ferrero; Ezio Fulcheri; Nicola Ragni; Dan C Martin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.347

9.  Endometriosis: contribution of 3.0-T pelvic MR imaging in preoperative assessment--initial results.

Authors:  Nathalie Hottat; Caroline Larrousse; Vincent Anaf; Jean-Christophe Noël; Celso Matos; Julie Absil; Thierry Metens
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Deep infiltrating endometriosis of the bowel: MR imaging as a method to predict muscular invasion.

Authors:  Milou P H Busard; Lisette E E van der Houwen; Maaike C G Bleeker; Indra C Pieters van den Bos; Miguel A Cuesta; Cornelis van Kuijk; Velja Mijatovic; Peter G A Hompes; Jan Hein T M van Waesberghe
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2012-08
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  Vicki Nisenblat; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Cindy Farquhar; Neil Johnson; M Louise Hull
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-26

2.  Author's Reply.

Authors:  Benedetta Gui
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 3.  MRI for the diagnosis and staging of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: a national survey of BSGE accredited endometriosis centres and review of the literature.

Authors:  Marianne Wild; Shikha Pandhi; John Rendle; Ian Swift; Emmanuel Ofuasia
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: Two Case Reports and Literature Review.

Authors:  Bogdan Doroftei; Theodora Armeanu; Radu Maftei; Ovidiu-Dumitru Ilie; Ana-Maria Dabuleanu; Constantin Condac
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 2.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.