Literature DB >> 32706984

MRI for the diagnosis and staging of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: a national survey of BSGE accredited endometriosis centres and review of the literature.

Marianne Wild1,2, Shikha Pandhi3, John Rendle3, Ian Swift4, Emmanuel Ofuasia1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to establish the primary mode of imaging and MR protocols utilised in the preoperative staging of deeply infiltrating endometriosis in centres accredited by the British Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE).
METHODS: The lead consultant radiologist in each centre was invited to complete an online survey detailing their protocols.
RESULTS: Out of 49 centres, 32 (65%) responded to the survey. Two centres performed transvaginal ultrasound as the primary method for preoperative staging of deeply infiltrating endometriosis and the remainder performed MRI. 21/25 centres did not recommend a period of fasting prior to MRI and 22/25 administered hyoscine butylbromide. None of the centres routinely offered bowel preparation or recommended a specific pre-procedure diet. 21/25 centres did not time imaging according to the woman's menstrual cycle, and instructions regarding bladder filling were varied. Rectal and vaginal opacification methods were infrequently utilised. All centres preferentially performed MRI in the supine position - six used an abdominal strap and four could facilitate prone imaging. Just under half of centres used pelvic-phased array coils and three centres used gadolinium contrast agents routinely. All centres performed T1W with fat-suppression and T2W without fat-suppression sequences. There was significant variation relating to other MR sequences depending on the unit.
CONCLUSIONS: There was significant inconsistency between centres in terms of MR protocols, patient preparation and the sequences performed. Many practices were out of line with current published evidence. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Our survey demonstrates a need for evidence-based standardisation of imaging in BSGE accredited endometriosis centres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32706984      PMCID: PMC7548358          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  80 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of endometriosis with imaging: a review.

Authors:  Karen Kinkel; Kathrin A Frei; Corinne Balleyguier; Charles Chapron
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-09-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Anatomic distribution of posterior deeply infiltrating endometriosis on MRI after vaginal and rectal gel opacification.

Authors:  Pierre Loubeyre; Patrick Petignat; Sandrine Jacob; Jean-François Egger; Jean-Bernard Dubuisson; Jean-Marie Wenger
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Evaluation of pelvic adhesions using multiphase and multislice MR imaging with kinematic display.

Authors:  M Katayama; T Masui; S Kobayashi; T Ito; H Sakahara; A Nozaki; H Kabasawa
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Gadolinium deposition in the brain.

Authors:  Tomonori Kanda; Yudai Nakai; Hiroshi Oba; Keiko Toyoda; Kazuhiro Kitajima; Shigeru Furui
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Endometriosis: contribution of 3.0-T pelvic MR imaging in preoperative assessment--initial results.

Authors:  Nathalie Hottat; Caroline Larrousse; Vincent Anaf; Jean-Christophe Noël; Celso Matos; Julie Absil; Thierry Metens
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Bowel endometriosis: preoperative diagnostic accuracy of 3.0-T MR enterography--initial results.

Authors:  Pascal Rousset; Noémie Peyron; Mathilde Charlot; Florence Chateau; François Golfier; Daniel Raudrant; Eddy Cotte; Sylvie Isaac; Frédérique Réty; Pierre-Jean Valette
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Pelvic MRI staging of endometriosis at 3 T without patient preparation or anti-peristaltic: Diagnostic performance outcomes.

Authors:  Shaun Zheng Liang Yap; Sebastian Leathersich; Joy Lu; Laura Fender; Glen Lo
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  The effectiveness of interventions to reduce anxiety, claustrophobia, sedation and non-completion rates of patients undergoing high technology medical imaging.

Authors:  Zachary Munn; Zoe Jordan
Journal:  JBI Libr Syst Rev       Date:  2012

Review 9.  The role of the multidisciplinary team in the management of deep infiltrating endometriosis.

Authors:  Lilian Ugwumadu; Rima Chakrabarti; Elaine Williams-Brown; John Rendle; Ian Swift; Babbin John; Heather Allen-Coward; Emmanuel Ofuasia
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2017-08-15

10.  European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis.

Authors:  M Bazot; N Bharwani; C Huchon; K Kinkel; T M Cunha; A Guerra; L Manganaro; L Buñesch; A Kido; K Togashi; I Thomassin-Naggara; A G Rockall
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Transvaginal Ultrasound vs. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Value in Endometriosis Diagnosis.

Authors:  Alexandra Baușic; Ciprian Coroleucă; Cătălin Coroleucă; Diana Comandașu; Roxana Matasariu; Andrei Manu; Francesca Frîncu; Claudia Mehedințu; Elvira Brătilă
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.