Literature DB >> 19584256

Endometriosis: contribution of 3.0-T pelvic MR imaging in preoperative assessment--initial results.

Nathalie Hottat1, Caroline Larrousse, Vincent Anaf, Jean-Christophe Noël, Celso Matos, Julie Absil, Thierry Metens.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of 3.0-T pelvic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the preoperative assessment of endometriosis and to evaluate colon wall involvement after intrarectal gel administration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval for this study was obtained, and each patient gave written informed consent. Forty-one consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of endometriosis underwent pelvic MR imaging at 3.0 T before surgery. Single-shot and high-spatial-resolution axial T2-weighted, sagittal fat-suppressed T2-weighted, and axial fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequences were performed. T2-weighted sequences were repeated after the rectum was filled with ultrasonographic (US) gel. Two blinded readers interpreted images independently. Image quality was scored by using a four-point scale. Detailed mapping of deep endometriosis was performed. Colon wall infiltration was graded (none, serosa, muscularis, submucosa, mucosa). MR imaging results were compared with surgical and pathologic findings. Interobserver agreement was assessed by using kappa statistics. Nonparametric tests were performed to compare colon wall infiltration scores without and those with US gel and between observers.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 41 patients had deep endometriosis at surgery and histopathologic examination. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis at MR imaging were 96.3% (26 of 27), 100% (14 of 14), 100% (26 of 26), 93.3% (14 of 15), and 97.6% (40 of 41), respectively. kappa Values ranged from 0.65 to 1.0, depending on the location of deep endometriosis. Colon wall infiltration assessment by both readers correlated well with pathologic findings (Spearman coefficient, >0.93), although median wall involvement scores were lower at pathologic examination than for both readers both before (P = .042 and P = .011) and after (P = .079 and P = .011) intrarectal gel filling.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging of the pelvis at 3.0 T is accurate in the diagnosis and staging of deep endometriosis for the preoperative assessment of patients clinically suspected of having endometriosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19584256     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2531082113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  11 in total

Review 1.  Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  Vicki Nisenblat; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Cindy Farquhar; Neil Johnson; M Louise Hull
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-26

Review 2.  MRI for the diagnosis and staging of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: a national survey of BSGE accredited endometriosis centres and review of the literature.

Authors:  Marianne Wild; Shikha Pandhi; John Rendle; Ian Swift; Emmanuel Ofuasia
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  How to improve MRI accuracy in detecting deep infiltrating colorectal endometriosis: MRI findings vs. laparoscopy and histopathology.

Authors:  Anna Lia Valentini; Benedetta Gui; Maura Miccò; Maria Carla Mingote; Valeria Ninivaggi; Maurizio Guido; Gian Franco Zannoni; Eleonora Marrucci; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Deep infiltrating endometriosis of the bowel: MR imaging as a method to predict muscular invasion.

Authors:  Milou P H Busard; Lisette E E van der Houwen; Maaike C G Bleeker; Indra C Pieters van den Bos; Miguel A Cuesta; Cornelis van Kuijk; Velja Mijatovic; Peter G A Hompes; Jan Hein T M van Waesberghe
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2012-08

Review 5.  The importance and perspective of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of endometriosis.

Authors:  Agnieszka Bianek-Bodzak; Edyta Szurowska; Sambor Sawicki; Marcin Liro
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Sonovaginography: redefining the concept of a "normal pelvis" on transvaginal ultrasound pre-laparoscopic intervention for suspected endometriosis.

Authors:  Shannon Reid; Simon Winder; George Condous
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

7.  The use of intra-operative saline sonovaginography to define the rectovaginal septum in women with suspected rectovaginal endometriosis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Shannon Reid; Tommaso Bignardi; Chuan Lu; Alan Lam; George Condous
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

Review 8.  MRI in the Diagnosis of Endometriosis and Related Diseases.

Authors:  Aki Kido; Yuki Himoto; Yusaku Moribata; Yasuhisa Kurata; Yuji Nakamoto
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis.

Authors:  M Bazot; N Bharwani; C Huchon; K Kinkel; T M Cunha; A Guerra; L Manganaro; L Buñesch; A Kido; K Togashi; I Thomassin-Naggara; A G Rockall
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Pelvic MRI: Is Endovaginal or Rectal Filling Needed?

Authors:  Constance Engelaere; Edouard Poncelet; Carole Durot; Anthony Dohan; Pascal Rousset; Christine Hoeffel
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.