Literature DB >> 18445559

Subtle cues of predation risk: starlings respond to a predator's direction of eye-gaze.

Julia Carter1, Nicholas J Lyons, Hannah L Cole, Arthur R Goldsmith.   

Abstract

For prey animals to negotiate successfully the fundamental trade-off between predation and starvation, a realistic assessment of predation risk is vital. Prey responses to conspicuous indicators of risk (such as looming predators or fleeing conspecifics) are well documented, but there should also be strong selection for the detection of more subtle cues. A predator's head orientation and eye-gaze direction are good candidates for subtle but useful indicators of risk, since many predators orient their head and eyes towards their prey as they attack. We describe the first explicit demonstration of a bird responding to a live predator's eye-gaze direction. We present wild-caught European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) with human 'predators' whose frontal appearance and gaze direction are manipulated independently, and show that starlings are sensitive to the predator's orientation, the presence of eyes and the direction of eye-gaze. Starlings respond in a functionally significant manner: when the predator's gaze was averted, starlings resumed feeding earlier, at a higher rate and consumed more food overall. By correctly assessing lower risk and returning to feeding activity earlier (as in this study), the animal gains a competitive advantage over conspecifics that do not respond to the subtle predator cue in this way.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18445559      PMCID: PMC2587789          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  19 in total

1.  EthoLog 2.2: a tool for the transcription and timing of behavior observation sessions.

Authors:  E B Ottoni
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2000-08

Review 2.  The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze.

Authors:  N J Emery
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Good foragers can also be good at detecting predators.

Authors:  W Cresswell; J L Quinn; M J Whittingham; S Butler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Time to collision is signalled by neurons in the nucleus rotundus of pigeons.

Authors:  Y Wang; B J Frost
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-03-19       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Unique morphology of the human eye and its adaptive meaning: comparative studies on external morphology of the primate eye.

Authors:  H Kobayashi; S Kohshima
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.895

6.  Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance.

Authors:  P A Bednekoff; S L Lima
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Back to the basics of antipredatory vigilance: can nonvigilant animals detect attack?

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Stimulus learning and response learning by observation in the European starling, in a two-object/two-action test.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  The experimenter as an independent variable in studies of animal hypnosis in chickens (Gallus gallus).

Authors:  G G Gallup; W H Cummings; R F Nash
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Body orientation and face orientation: two factors controlling apes' behavior from humans.

Authors:  Juliane Kaminski; Josep Call; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  New perspectives in gaze sensitivity research.

Authors:  Gabrielle L Davidson; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Influence of gaze and directness of approach on the escape responses of the Indian rock lizard, Psammophilus dorsalis (Gray, 1831).

Authors:  Rachakonda Sreekar; Suhel Quader
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Salient eyes deter conspecific nest intruders in wild jackdaws (Corvus monedula).

Authors:  Gabrielle L Davidson; Nicola S Clayton; Alex Thornton
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  European starlings recognize the location of robotic conspecific attention.

Authors:  Shannon R Butler; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Great-tailed grackles can independently direct their eyes toward different targets.

Authors:  Jessica L Yorzinski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A comparative view of face perception.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey.

Authors:  Larissa Conradt; Christian List
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Uncovering dangerous cheats: how do avian hosts recognize adult brood parasites?

Authors:  Alfréd Trnka; Pavol Prokop; Tomáš Grim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Direct look from a predator shortens the risk-assessment time by prey.

Authors:  Sang-im Lee; Soyun Hwang; Young-eun Joe; Hyun-kyung Cha; Gun-ho Joo; Hyeon-jeong Lee; Ji-won Kim; Piotr G Jablonski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Responses of Young Domestic Horses to Human-Given Cues.

Authors:  Leanne Proops; Jenny Rayner; Anna M Taylor; Karen McComb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.