Literature DB >> 24294273

Cost comparison of linezolid versus vancomycin for treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Quebec.

Martine Pettigrew1, Daniel Jg Thirion, Michael Libman, Giovanni Zanotti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Canada, complicated skin and skin-structure infection (cSSSI) caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is usually treated with antibiotics in hospital, with a follow-up course at home for stable patients. The cost implications of using intravenous and oral linezolid instead of intravenous vancomycin in Canadian clinical practice have not been examined.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential treatment cost impact for the Quebec health care system of linezolid versus vancomycin for MRSA-related cSSSI therapy, using a net impact analysis approach.
METHODS: Health care resource use associated with linezolid and vancomycin therapy was estimated for patients in Quebec, based on expert opinion. Costs were assigned to health care resources (antibiotics, medical supplies, laboratory testing and health care professional time) based on unit prices. The base-case analysis assumed 14 days of antibiotic treatment for both agents; five days in hospital followed by nine days at home. Therapy duration, length of inpatient treatment and discharge rates were varied in sensitivity analyses.
RESULTS: Antibiotic costs were higher for linezolid than for vancomycin, for both inpatient ($874 versus $144, respectively) and outpatient therapy ($1,356 versus $1,242, respectively). Compared with vancomycin, lower costs for antibiotic preparation, administration and monitoring of linezolid offset drug acquisition costs. Total treatment costs were $3,850 for linezolid versus $5,189 for vancomycin. Results were sensitive to the number of treatment days spent at home and the discharge rate.
CONCLUSION: Using linezolid instead of vancomycin to treat MRSA-related cSSSI, for hospital and home courses combined, may reduce health care resource utilization and costs in Quebec.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complicated skin and soft-tissue infection; Cost analysis; Linezolid; MRSA; Methicillin resistance; Vancomycin

Year:  2012        PMID: 24294273      PMCID: PMC3597396          DOI: 10.1155/2012/585603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol        ISSN: 1712-9532            Impact factor:   2.471


  28 in total

1.  Impact of linezolid on economic outcomes and determinants of cost in a clinical trial evaluating patients with MRSA complicated skin and soft-tissue infections.

Authors:  Peggy S McKinnon; Sonja V Sorensen; Larry Z Liu; Kamal Mf Itani
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 3.154

2.  A retrospective analysis of practice patterns in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections at three Canadian tertiary care centres.

Authors:  John M Conly; H Grant Stiver; Karl A Weiss; Debbie L Becker; Andrew J Rosner; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-11

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of linezolid vs. vancomycin in treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus complicated skin and soft tissue infections using a decision analytic model.

Authors:  M Bounthavong; D I Hsu; M P Okamoto
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children.

Authors:  Catherine Liu; Arnold Bayer; Sara E Cosgrove; Robert S Daum; Scott K Fridkin; Rachel J Gorwitz; Sheldon L Kaplan; Adolf W Karchmer; Donald P Levine; Barbara E Murray; Michael J Rybak; David A Talan; Henry F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Clinical and economic outcomes of oral linezolid versus intravenous vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA-complicated, lower-extremity skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J Neal Sharpe; Eugene H Shively; Hiram C Polk
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Linezolid versus vancomycin in treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  John Weigelt; Kamal Itani; Dennis Stevens; William Lau; Matthew Dryden; Charles Knirsch
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  A comparison of costs and hospital length of stay associated with intravenous/oral linezolid or intravenous vancomycin treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections caused by suspected or confirmed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in elderly US patients.

Authors:  Marianne McCollum; Sonja V Sorensen; Larry Z Liu
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.393

8.  Comparison of community- and health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  Timothy S Naimi; Kathleen H LeDell; Kathryn Como-Sabetti; Stephanie M Borchardt; David J Boxrud; Jerome Etienne; Susan K Johnson; Francois Vandenesch; Scott Fridkin; Carol O'Boyle; Richard N Danila; Ruth Lynfield
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  Addison K May
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 10.  Linezolid versus vancomycin for MRSA skin and soft tissue infections (systematic review and meta-analysis).

Authors:  Tristan John Dodds; Catherine Isobel Hawke
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.872

View more
  2 in total

1.  Examination of hospital length of stay in Canada among patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Michele H Potashman; Michael Stokes; Jieruo Liu; Robin Lawrence; Linda Harris
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 2.  Quantifying the Value of Introducing an Oral Drug Delivery Option for Edaravone: A Review of Analyses Evaluating the Economic Impact of Oral versus Intravenous Formulations.

Authors:  Naoko A Ronquest; Kyle Paret; Aaron Lucas; Malgorzata Ciepielewska; Melissa Hagan
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2022-07-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.