Literature DB >> 19895519

Linezolid versus vancomycin for MRSA skin and soft tissue infections (systematic review and meta-analysis).

Tristan John Dodds1, Catherine Isobel Hawke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This review aims to compare the effectiveness of linezolid to vancomycin for the treatment of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in inpatients.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists were searched in March 2007. We included randomized controlled trials that looked at inpatients treated with linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of hospital-acquired MRSA SSTIs. Outcome measures were clinical cure (resolution of symptoms and signs) and microbiological cure (eradication of MRSA on wound culture). The validity of the included trials was assessed. The results were combined in meta-analyses, the robustness of which was tested in sensitivity analyses.
RESULTS: Four trials were included in this review: three for clinical outcomes (174 participants) and three for microbiological outcomes (439 participants). For clinical outcomes there were non-significant trends in favour of linezolid (RR 0.34; 95% CI 0.04, 2.89; P = 0.32). For microbiological outcomes there was weak evidence of linezolid outperforming vancomycin (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.30, 1.01; P = 0.05). Sensitivity analyses did not change the conclusions taken from the main analysis.
CONCLUSION: With the current available data no difference could be detected between the two treatments, but a trend towards higher effectiveness of linezolid was observed. More data will be required to determine if linezolid is superior to vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA SSTIs. Further systematic reviews are needed to look at other outcomes (length of hospital stay, safety and tolerability, cost-effectiveness) and at MRSA infections at other sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19895519     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05018.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  11 in total

1.  Vancomycin and nephrotoxicity: just another myth?

Authors:  Stephen W Davies; Christopher A Guidry; Robin T Petroze; Tjasa Hranjec; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Cost comparison of linezolid versus vancomycin for treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Quebec.

Authors:  Martine Pettigrew; Daniel Jg Thirion; Michael Libman; Giovanni Zanotti
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 3.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Oxazolidinones.

Authors:  Claire Roger; Jason A Roberts; Laurent Muller
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Efficacy and safety of linezolid for the treatment of infections in children: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Ioannidou; Fani Apostolidou-Kiouti; Anna-Bettina Haidich; Ioannis Niopas; Emmanuel Roilides
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 5.  Complicated skin, skin structure and soft tissue infections - are we threatened by multi-resistant pathogens?

Authors:  P Kujath; C Kujath
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.175

6.  An evidence-based review of linezolid for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): place in therapy.

Authors:  Richard R Watkins; Tracy L Lemonovich; Thomas M File
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2012-12-11

Review 7.  Treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections caused by resistant bacteria: value of linezolid, tigecycline, daptomycin and vancomycin.

Authors:  Christian Eckmann; M Dryden
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.175

8.  Comparative efficacy and safety of antibiotics used to treat acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: Results of a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian F Guest; Jaime Esteban; Anton G Manganelli; Andrea Novelli; Giuliano Rizzardini; Miquel Serra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The efficacy and safety of linezolid and glycopeptides in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Jinjian Fu; Xiaohua Ye; Cha Chen; Sidong Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Economic burden of inpatient and outpatient antibiotic treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus complicated skin and soft-tissue infections: a comparison of linezolid, vancomycin, and daptomycin.

Authors:  Jennifer M Stephens; Xin Gao; Dipen A Patel; Bram G Verheggen; Ahmed Shelbaya; Seema Haider
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.