Literature DB >> 17577468

A comparison of costs and hospital length of stay associated with intravenous/oral linezolid or intravenous vancomycin treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections caused by suspected or confirmed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in elderly US patients.

Marianne McCollum1, Sonja V Sorensen, Larry Z Liu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the costs and hospital length of stay (LOS) and duration of intravenous therapy associated with intravenous/oral linezolid or intravenous vancomycin treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections (cSSTIs) caused by suspected or confirmed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in elderly US patients.
METHODS: Data were obtained from elderly (>or=65 years) US patients participating in a multinational randomized trial of hospitalized cSSTI patients treated with linezolid or vancomycin. Costs (hospital and total) from the provider perspective were estimated for intent-to-treat (ITT) patients (ie, all those receiving >or=1 dose) using national 2003 costs (ward, medication, intravenous administration). LOS for inpatient care, duration of intravenous linezolid and vancomycin therapy (ITT and MRSA groups), and cure rates were evaluated.
RESULTS: Of 717 enrolled subjects, 163 (23%) were elderly (87 linezolid, 76 vancomycin), with no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the linezolid and vancomycin groups. Mean hospitalization and total costs were lower with linezolid compared with vancomycin (hospitalization: US $4510 vs US $6478, P<0.001; total: US $6009 vs US $7329, P=0.03). Linezolid was associated with a 3.5-day reduction in LOS and a 9.5-day reduction in the duration of intravenous therapy compared with vancomycin in the ITT group (both, P<0.001). Cure rates were comparable between linezolid and vancomycin in both the ITT group (88.7% vs 81.4%, respectively) and the MRSA group (80.0% vs 71.4%). In multivariate analyses of the ITT group, linezolid patients were 57% less likely than vancomycin patients to have a LOS >7 days (odds ratio = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.21-0.87). Chronic renal failure, malnutrition, and a diagnosis of infected ulcer predicted an LOS >7 days.
CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of data from elderly patients with cSSTI caused by suspected or confirmed MRSA, linezolid treatment was associated with reductions in the costs of care, LOS, and duration of intravenous treatment without affecting the clinical outcomes. Although the use of a subset of patients from a larger trial that did not focus on the elderly can be seen as a study limitation, the elderly represent an important population when evaluating health care resource use and costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17577468     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(07)80085-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  10 in total

1.  General principles of antimicrobial therapy.

Authors:  Surbhi Leekha; Christine L Terrell; Randall S Edson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Vancomycin and nephrotoxicity: just another myth?

Authors:  Stephen W Davies; Christopher A Guidry; Robin T Petroze; Tjasa Hranjec; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.313

3.  Comparative effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin among a national cohort of patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Aisling R Caffrey; Brian J Quilliam; Kerry L LaPlante
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Cost comparison of linezolid versus vancomycin for treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Quebec.

Authors:  Martine Pettigrew; Daniel Jg Thirion; Michael Libman; Giovanni Zanotti
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 5.  Profile of tedizolid phosphate and its potential in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  Ronald G Hall; Heidi N Michaels
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Rising Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Ear, Nose, and Throat Diseases.

Authors:  Sangeetha Thirumazhisi Sachithanandam
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-06

Review 7.  Intravenous Vancomycin Dosing in the Elderly: A Focus on Clinical Issues and Practical Application.

Authors:  Katie E Barber; Allison M Bell; Kayla R Stover; Jamie L Wagner
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Economic burden of inpatient and outpatient antibiotic treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus complicated skin and soft-tissue infections: a comparison of linezolid, vancomycin, and daptomycin.

Authors:  Jennifer M Stephens; Xin Gao; Dipen A Patel; Bram G Verheggen; Ahmed Shelbaya; Seema Haider
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-09-16

9.  Evaluation of the Combined Effects of Stilbenoid from Shorea gibbosa and Vancomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Authors:  Dayang Fredalina Basri; Chan Kin Luoi; Abdul Muin Azmi; Jalifah Latip
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2012-09-20

10.  Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Vancomycin, Linezolid, Tedizolid, and Daptomycin in Treating Patients with Suspected or Proven Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: An Updated Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jingjuan Feng; Feng Xiang; Jian Cheng; Yeli Gou; Jun Li
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2021-06-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.