Madalena D Costa1, William T Schnettler2, Célia Amorim-Costa3, João Bernardes3, Antónia Costa3, Ary L Goldberger4, Diogo Ayres-de-Campos3. 1. Division of Interdisciplinary Medicine and Biotechnology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; The Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: mcosta3@bidmc.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, São João Hospital and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. 4. Division of Interdisciplinary Medicine and Biotechnology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; The Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Continuous fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring remains central to intrapartum care. However, advances in signal analysis are needed to increase its accuracy in diagnosis of fetal hypoxia. AIMS: To determine whether FHR complexity, an index of multiscale variability, is lower among fetuses born with low (≤7.05) versus higher pH values, and whether this measure can potentially be used to help discriminate the two groups. STUDY DESIGN: Evaluation of a pre-existing database of sequentially acquired intrapartum FHR signals. SUBJECTS: FHR tracings, obtained from a continuous scalp electrocardiogram during labor, were analyzed using the multiscale entropy (MSE) method in 148 singletons divided in two groups according to umbilical artery pH at birth: 141 fetuses with pH>7.05 and 7 with pH≤7.05. A complexity index derived from MSE analysis was calculated for each recording. RESULTS: The complexity of FHR signals for the last two hours before delivery was significantly (p<0.004) higher for non-acidemic than for acidemic fetuses. The difference between the two groups remained significant (p<0.003) when FHR data from the last 30min before delivery were excluded. CONCLUSION: Complexity of FHR signals, as measured by the MSE method, was significantly lower for acidemic than non-acidemic fetuses. These results are consistent with previous studies showing that decreased nonlinear complexity is a dynamical signature of disrupted physiologic control systems. This analytic approach may have discriminative value in FHR analysis.
BACKGROUND: Continuous fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring remains central to intrapartum care. However, advances in signal analysis are needed to increase its accuracy in diagnosis of fetal hypoxia. AIMS: To determine whether FHR complexity, an index of multiscale variability, is lower among fetuses born with low (≤7.05) versus higher pH values, and whether this measure can potentially be used to help discriminate the two groups. STUDY DESIGN: Evaluation of a pre-existing database of sequentially acquired intrapartum FHR signals. SUBJECTS: FHR tracings, obtained from a continuous scalp electrocardiogram during labor, were analyzed using the multiscale entropy (MSE) method in 148 singletons divided in two groups according to umbilical artery pH at birth: 141 fetuses with pH>7.05 and 7 with pH≤7.05. A complexity index derived from MSE analysis was calculated for each recording. RESULTS: The complexity of FHR signals for the last two hours before delivery was significantly (p<0.004) higher for non-acidemic than for acidemic fetuses. The difference between the two groups remained significant (p<0.003) when FHR data from the last 30min before delivery were excluded. CONCLUSION: Complexity of FHR signals, as measured by the MSE method, was significantly lower for acidemic than non-acidemic fetuses. These results are consistent with previous studies showing that decreased nonlinear complexity is a dynamical signature of disrupted physiologic control systems. This analytic approach may have discriminative value in FHR analysis.
Authors: Ary L Goldberger; Luis A N Amaral; Jeffrey M Hausdorff; Plamen Ch Ivanov; C-K Peng; H Eugene Stanley Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-02-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: E Salamalekis; E Hintipas; I Salloum; G Vasios; C Loghis; N Vitoratos; Ch Chrelias; G Creatsas Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2006-03
Authors: William T Schnettler; Ary L Goldberger; Steven J Ralston; Madalena Costa Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 2.435
Authors: George Georgoulas; Petros Karvelis; Jiří Spilka; Václav Chudáček; Chrysostomos D Stylios; Lenka Lhotská Journal: Health Technol (Berl) Date: 2017-07-04
Authors: Maria Ribeiro; João Monteiro-Santos; Luísa Castro; Luís Antunes; Cristina Costa-Santos; Andreia Teixeira; Teresa S Henriques Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2021-11-30