Literature DB >> 8134732

Sample size calculations for ordered categorical data.

J Whitehead1.   

Abstract

Many clinical trials yield data on an ordered categorical scale such as very good, good, moderate, poor. Under the assumption of proportional odds, such data can be analysed using techniques of logistic regression. In simple comparisons of two treatments this approach becomes equivalent to the Mann-Whitney test. In this paper sample size formulae consistent with an eventual logistic regression analysis are derived. The influence on efficiency of the number and breadth of categories will be examined. Effects of misclassification and of stratification are discussed, and examples of the calculations are given.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8134732     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780122404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  62 in total

1.  Sample size calculations in studies using the EuroQol 5D.

Authors:  M Roset; X Badia; N E Mayo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  A unified framework for the comparison of treatments with ordinal responses.

Authors:  Tong-Yu Lu; Wai-Yin Poon; Siu Hung Cheung
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Computationally simple analysis of matched, outcome-based studies of ordinal disease states.

Authors:  Rebecca A Betensky; Jackie Szymonifka; Eudocia Q Lee; Catherine L Nutt; Tracy T Batchelor
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Should the diagnosis of major depression be made independent of or dependent upon the psychosocial context?

Authors:  K S Kendler; J Myers; L J Halberstadt
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  Sample size/power calculations for repeated ordinal measurements in population pharmacodynamic experiments.

Authors:  Kayode Ogungbenro; Leon Aarons
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Impact of GOS misclassification on ordinal outcome analysis of traumatic brain injury clinical trials.

Authors:  Juan Lu; Anthony Marmarou; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Sample sizes for randomized trials measuring quality of life in cancer patients.

Authors:  S A Julious; S George; D Machin; R J Stephens
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Regression analysis of ordinal stroke clinical trial outcomes: an application to the NINDS t-PA trial.

Authors:  Stacia M Desantis; Christos Lazaridis; Yuko Palesch; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 5.266

9.  Methodological issues regarding power of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT)-based approaches for the comparison of patient-reported outcomes in two groups of patients--a simulation study.

Authors:  Véronique Sébille; Jean-Benoit Hardouin; Tanguy Le Néel; Gildas Kubis; François Boyer; Francis Guillemin; Bruno Falissard
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  The influence of the media on COPD patients' knowledge regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Stefano Nava; Carmen Santoro; Mario Grassi; Nicholas Hill
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.