Natacha Bohin1, Tiffany Wen1, Qing Li1, Victor Ng1, Jeffrey Magee2, Shann-Ching Chen3, Kevin Shannon4, Sean J Morrison2. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA. 2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Pediatrics, and Children's Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390, USA. 3. Department of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.
Abstract
'Pre-leukaemic' mutations are thought to promote clonal expansion of haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) by increasing self-renewal and competitiveness; however, mutations that increase HSC proliferation tend to reduce competitiveness and self-renewal potential, raising the question of how a mutant HSC can sustainably outcompete wild-type HSCs. Activating mutations in NRAS are prevalent in human myeloproliferative neoplasms and leukaemia. Here we show that a single allele of oncogenic Nras(G12D) increases HSC proliferation but also increases reconstituting and self-renewal potential upon serial transplantation in irradiated mice, all prior to leukaemia initiation. Nras(G12D) also confers long-term self-renewal potential to multipotent progenitors. To explore the mechanism by which Nras(G12D) promotes HSC proliferation and self-renewal, we assessed cell-cycle kinetics using H2B-GFP label retention and 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation. Nras(G12D) had a bimodal effect on HSCs, increasing the frequency with which some HSCs divide and reducing the frequency with which others divide. This mirrored bimodal effects on reconstituting potential, as rarely dividing Nras(G12D) HSCs outcompeted wild-type HSCs, whereas frequently dividing Nras(G12D) HSCs did not. Nras(G12D) caused these effects by promoting STAT5 signalling, inducing different transcriptional responses in different subsets of HSCs. One signal can therefore increase HSC proliferation, competitiveness and self-renewal through bimodal effects on HSC gene expression, cycling and reconstituting potential.
'Pre-leukaemic' mutations are thought to promote clonal expansion of haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) by increasing self-renewal and competitiveness; however, mutations that increase HSC proliferation tend to reduce competitiveness and self-renewal potential, raising the question of how a mutant HSC can sustainably outcompete wild-type HSCs. Activating mutations in NRAS are prevalent in human myeloproliferative neoplasms and leukaemia. Here we show that a single allele of oncogenic Nras(G12D) increases HSC proliferation but also increases reconstituting and self-renewal potential upon serial transplantation in irradiated mice, all prior to leukaemia initiation. Nras(G12D) also confers long-term self-renewal potential to multipotent progenitors. To explore the mechanism by which Nras(G12D) promotes HSC proliferation and self-renewal, we assessed cell-cycle kinetics using H2B-GFP label retention and 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation. Nras(G12D) had a bimodal effect on HSCs, increasing the frequency with which some HSCs divide and reducing the frequency with which others divide. This mirrored bimodal effects on reconstituting potential, as rarely dividing Nras(G12D) HSCs outcompeted wild-type HSCs, whereas frequently dividing Nras(G12D) HSCs did not. Nras(G12D) caused these effects by promoting STAT5 signalling, inducing different transcriptional responses in different subsets of HSCs. One signal can therefore increase HSC proliferation, competitiveness and self-renewal through bimodal effects on HSC gene expression, cycling and reconstituting potential.
To gain a durable competitive advantage, mutant HSCs must sustainably self-renew more frequently than wild-type HSCs. Yet increased HSC division is almost always associated with reduced self-renewal potential and HSC depletion[3-5]. Many oncogenic mutations increase HSC proliferation but deplete HSCs, preventing clonal expansion[6]. Some oncogenic mutations do increase HSC self-renewal, including over-expression of Ezh2[7] or Csf3r truncation[8], and deletion of p18, Tet2[10], Dnmt3a
[11] or Lnk
[12,13]. However, it remains uncertain whether these mutations can account for pre-leukemic expansion.Human leukemias commonly have mutations that increase Ras signaling, including NRAS or KRAS2 point mutations[2]. Mouse models with conditional expression of oncogenic Kras develop a rapid onset, aggressive myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) [14,15]. KrasG12D drives HSCs into cycle and reduces HSC frequency [14,15]. Nras knock-in mice, on the other hand, develop an indolent MPN with delayed onset and prolonged survival [16,17]. NF1 inactivation[18] or Nras expression[17,19] allow bone marrow cells to out-compete wild-type cells in transplantation assays but it remains unclear whether they promote sustained pre-leukemic expansion, or how that might occur.To conditionally activate a single allele of Nras in HSCs we generated Mx-1-Cre; Nras mice in which the oncogenic G12D mutation was knocked into the endogenous Nras locus along with a floxed stop cassette[20]. To induce Nras expression, mice were administered poly-inosine:poly-cytosine (pIpC) at 6-10 weeks after birth (Extended data Figure 1). At 2 weeks and 3 months after pIpC treatment, more than twice as many Nras CD150+CD48−Lineage−Sca-1+c-kit+ (CD150+CD48−LSK) HSCs[21] incorporated a 24-hour pulse of bromo-deoxyuridine (BrdU) as compared to control HSCs (p<0.01; Figure 1a). Consistent with this, twice as many Nras HSCs were in G1 phase of the cell cycle as compared to control HSCs (Extended data Figure 1b). This increase in HSC proliferation did not significantly affect the number of HSCs or multipotent progenitors (MPPs) two weeks after Nras activation (Figure 1c). However, Mx-1-Cre; Nras mice had significantly more LSK cells in the bone marrow and spleen (Figure 1c). We also observed a two-fold increase in BrdU incorporation in HSCs as well as an expansion of LSK cells in Vav1-Cre; Nras mice as compared to controls (Figure 1b; Extended data Figure 2a). Thus Nras increased HSC division and expanded the pool of primitive hematopoietic progenitors.
Extended data Figure 1
a) The Nras allele was recombined in all HSCs after 3 doses (every other day) of pIpC. Two weeks after the last dose of pIpC was administered to Mx1-cre; Nras mice, the mice were sacrificed and individual CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs were sorted into methylcellulose cultures in 96 well plates. The cells were cultured for 14 days then DNA was extracted from individual colonies and genotyped by PCR. The size of the recombined Nras allele (G12D) was 550bp and the Nras+ allele (WT) was 500bp. Nras recombination was observed in 22 of 22 HSC colonies examined. Blot is representative of three independent experiments. b) Cell cycle analysis of HSCs by pyronin Y and DAPI staining. CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs were sorted from Mx1-cre; Nras mice and littermate controls into 100% ethanol and stained with pyronin Y and DAPI to identify cells in G0 (left lower quadrant), G1 (left upper quadrant) and S/G2/M (right upper and lower quadrants). Data represent mean±s.d.. Statistical analysis was performed with a two-way ANOVA (P<0.01, n=4) followed by pairwise posthoc t-tests.
Figure 1
Nras increased HSC proliferation and competitiveness
a) A 24-hour pulse of BrdU was administered to Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) and littermate control (con) mice at 2 weeks and 3 months after pIpC treatment (n=3 mice/treatment). b) BrdU incorporation by CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs from Vav1-Cre; Nras mice (G12D/+) or littermate controls (con) at 6-10 weeks of age (n=3). c) The total number of CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs, CD150−CD48−LSK MPPs, and LSK cells in the bone marrow and spleens of Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) and littermate control (con) mice at 2 weeks after pIpC treatment (n=5 mice/treatment). d) 5×105 donor bone marrow cells from Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or littermate control (con) mice at 2 weeks after pIpC treatment (n=3 donors/genotype) were transplanted into irradiated recipient mice (n=15 recipients/genotype) along with 5×105 recipient bone marrow cells. Donor cell reconstitution in the myeloid (Mac-1+ cells), B (B220+), and T (CD3+) cell lineages for 4 to 20 weeks after transplantation. e) Recipients of Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) bone marrow cells (n=5) had significantly (p<0.05) higher proportions of donor-derived HSCs, MPPs and LSK cells compared to recipients of control bone marrow cells (con). f) 10 donor HSCs from Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or littermate control (con) mice at 2 weeks after pIpC treatment (n=3 donors/genotype) were transplanted into irradiated recipient mice (n=14 recipients/genotype) along with 3×105 recipient bone marrow cells. Data represent mean±s.d.. Two-tailed student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
Extended data Figure 2
HSC competitiveness is increased in Vav1-Cre; Nras mice
a) Frequencies of CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs, CD150−CD48−LSK MPPs, and LSK cells in the bone marrow (BM, top row) and spleen (sp, bottom row) of Vav1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or littermate control (con) mice (n=4) at 6-10 weeks of age. b) 5×105 donor bone marrow cells from Vav1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or littermate control (con) mice at 6-10 weeks of age were transplanted into irradiated recipient mice along with 5×105 recipient bone marrow cells (3 donors/genotype were each transplanted into 4 recipients/donor). c) Secondary transplantation of 3×106 bone marrow cells from primary recipient mice in Extended data Figure 2b at 20 weeks after transplantation (2 primary recipients/genotype were each transplanted into 4 secondary recipients/primary recipient). Data represent mean±s.d.. Two-tailed student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
To test competitiveness we transplanted 5×105 whole bone marrow cells from Mx-1-Cre; Nras or control donors into irradiated wild-type recipients along with 5×105 recipient bone marrow cells. The Nras cells gave significantly higher levels of reconstitution than control cells in all lineages for at least 20 weeks after transplantation (Figure 1d). In recipients of control donor cells, 69±13% of HSCs, 47±12% of MPPs, and 44±12% of LSK cells were donor-derived (Figure 1e); however, in recipients of Nras donor cells 93±8% of HSCs, 90±8% of MPPs, and 85±15% of LSK cells were donor-derived (Figure 1e). Nras HSCs therefore outcompeted wild-type HSCs.To further test whether Nras HSCs could outcompete wild-type HSCs we transplanted 10 CD150+CD48−LSK donor HSCs from the bone marrow of Mx-1-Cre; Nras or littermate control mice (2 weeks after finishing pIpC) into irradiated wild-type recipients along with 3×105 recipient bone marrow cells. The Nras HSCs gave significantly higher levels of reconstitution compared to control donor HSCs in all lineages for at least 20 weeks after transplantation (Figure 1f).To assess self-renewal potential we serially transplanted 3×106 whole bone marrow cells from three or four recipients per treatment into 2–5 irradiated mice per recipient (depending on the number of bone marrow cells we recovered) during each round of transplantation. In secondary, tertiary, and quaternary recipient mice we continued to observe significantly higher levels of reconstitution from the Nras donor cells than from control donor cells in all lineages (Figure 2a–c). In tertiary recipient mice the control cells gave only transient multilineage reconstitution as they appeared to exhaust their self-renewal potential. In contrast, the Nras HSCs gave high levels of long-term multilineage reconstitution in all 9 tertiary recipients, suggesting increased self-renewal potential. In quaternary recipient mice Nras donor cells continued to give long-term multilineage reconstitution in most recipients while control donor cells gave only low levels of transient lymphoid reconstitution (Figure 2c). Nras thus increased the self-renewal potential of HSCs in addition to increasing their rate of division (Figure 1a) and their ability to compete with wild-type HSCs (Figure 1d, f).
Figure 2
Nras increased HSC and MPP self-renewal
a) Secondary transplantation (n=19 recipients/genotype) of 3×106 bone marrow cells from primary recipient mice in Figure 1c (n=4 donors/genotype). Donor cell reconstitution in the myeloid (Mac-1+), B (B220+), and T (CD3+) cell lineages for 4 to 20 weeks after transplantation b) Transplantation of 3×106 bone marrow cells from secondary recipient mice in Figure 2a (n=3 donors/genotype) into tertiary recipient mice (n=8 recipients for control and 9 recipients for Nras) c) Transplantation of 3×106 bone marrow cells from tertiary recipient mice (n=3 donors for control and 4 donors for Nras) in Figure 2b into quaternary recipient mice (n=7 recipients for control and 17 for Nras). Each serial transplant was performed at 20 weeks after the prior round of transplantation. Data represent mean±s.d.. Two-tailed student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
A fifth round of transplantation from four quaternary recipients of Nras cells did not yield any multilineage reconstitution by donor cells in the recipient mice (Extended data Figure 3). Nras HSCs, therefore, eventually exhausted their self-renewal potential despite self-renewing more than control cells. Serial transplantation of Vav1-Cre; Nras whole bone marrow cells showed that Nras significantly increased HSC competitiveness in this genetic background as well (Extended data Figure 2b and 2c).
Extended data Figure 3
HSCs from Mx1-cre; Nras mice were not immortalized
A fifth round of serial transplantation of 3×106 bone marrow cells from the quaternary recipients of Nras (G12D/+) bone marrow cells shown in Figure 2c showed that the Nras HSCs eventually exhausted all of their HSCs and MPPs and were able to only give low levels of lymphoid reconstitution. Four donor mice from Figure 2c were transplanted 20 weeks after the fourth round of transplantation into 4 recipients per quaternary donor. The data represent mean±s.d. for donor blood cells in the myeloid (Gr-1+ or Mac-1+ cells), B (B220+), and T (CD3+) cell lineages.
To test whether Nras expression influenced the reconstituting potential of MPPs we transplanted 10 donor CD150−CD48−LSK cells[22] from the bone marrow of Mx-1-Cre; Nras or littermate control mice (2 weeks after finishing pIpC) into irradiated recipients along with 3×105 recipient bone marrow cells. Only one of 14 recipients of control MPPs exhibited long-term multilineage reconstitution by donor cells (Extended data Figure 4a). In contrast, 8 of 17 recipients of Nras MPPs were long-term multilineage reconstituted by donor cells. Nras MPPs were thus significantly (p<0.01 across three independent experiments) more likely to give long-term multilineage reconstitution than control MPPs.
Extended data Figure 4
Nras (G12D/+) expression increased the reconstituting potential of CD150−CD48+LSK MPPs but did not affect the reconstituting potential of CD150+CD48+LSK, or CD150−CD48+LSK progenitors in irradiated mice
a) 10 donor MPPs, b) 25 CD150+CD48+LSK progenitors, or c) 100 CD150−CD48+LSK progenitors from Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or littermate control (con) mice at 2 weeks after pIpC treatment were transplanted into irradiated recipient mice along with 3×105 recipient bone marrow cells. Data represent mean±s.d. for donor blood cells in the myeloid (Gr-1+ or Mac-1+ cells), B (B220+), and T (CD3+) cell lineages. Two-tailed student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance. None of the time points were significantly different between treatments. The data represent two independent experiments with 4 recipient mice per donor
Nras did not detectably affect the reconstituting potential of 25 CD150+CD48+LSK cells or 100 CD150−CD48+LSK cells (which contain restricted myeloid progenitors[22]) upon transplantation into irradiated mice (Extended data Figure 4b and 4c). Nras thus increases the self-renewal potentials of HSCs and MPPs but not necessarily other progenitors.We did not detect any evidence of leukemia or MPN in any of the recipient mice from the first, second, third, or fourth rounds of serial transplantation in terms of blood cell counts (Extended data Figure 5) or histology (data not shown). Only two recipients of Nras cells and two recipients of control cells died spontaneously in these experiments. The effects of Nras on HSC function therefore occurred in the absence of leukemogenesis.
Extended data Figure 5
Nras-induced changes in HSC function were not associated with the development of leukemia
White blood counts (WBC), hemoglobulin (Hb) levels, platelet counts, and spleen masses for recipient mice from primary transplants (a; from Figure 1d), secondary transplants (b; from Figure 2a), tertiary transplants (c; from Figure 2b) and quaternary transplants (d; from Figure 2c). In all cases, these blood cell counts were collected from mice after the analysis of blood cell reconstitution was complete (at least 20 weeks after transplantation). The transplanted mice were observed for a median time of 260 (162–315) days for primary recipient mice, 194 (122–264) days for secondary recipient mice, 224 (176–336) days for tertiary recipient mice, and 280 (279–280) days for quaternary recipient mice. We never observed evidence of leukemia or MPN by histology in these mice. Across all of the experiments, only two recipients of Nras cells and two recipients of control cells died spontaneously. Data represent mean±s.d.. Two-tailed student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance and none of the comparisons showed significant difference.
To assess the effect of Nras on HSC cycling over time we mated the Mx1-cre; Nras mice with Col1A1-H2B-GFP; Rosa26-M2-rtTA double transgenic mice [4]. These mice allowed us to label HSCs with H2B-GFP during a 6 week period of doxycycline administration and then to follow the division history of all cells in the HSC pool as they diluted H2B-GFP with each round of division during a subsequent 12–15 week chase without doxycycline.Two weeks after pIpC treatment, Mx1-cre; Nras; Col1A1-H2B-GFP; Rosa26-M2-rtTA mice and Nras; Col1A1-H2B-GFP; Rosa26-M2-rtTA controls (lacking Cre) exhibited similar background levels of GFP fluorescence (Figure 3a). After treating the mice with doxycycline for 6 weeks, all HSCs were strongly GFP+ (Figure 3a). Mx1-cre; Nras and control HSCs exhibited indistinguishable levels of H2B-GFP labeling immediately after doxycycline treatment (Figure 3a). After a 12-week chase without doxycycline, the Nras and control HSCs exhibited a wide range of GFP expression levels (Figure 3b). In contrast, most bone marrow cells from Mx1-cre; Nras and control mice exhibited GFP levels similar to background (Extended data Figure 6a). To assess the frequencies of HSCs that were most infrequently cycling, most frequently cycling, and moderately cycling we determined the frequencies of H2B-GFPhi HSCs (with GFP levels similar to freshly labeled cells, see Figure 3a), H2B-GFP− HSCs (with little or no GFP expression above background, see Figure 3a), and H2B-GFPlo HSCs (with intermediate levels of GFP), respectively. In eight independent experiments, Nras significantly (p<0.05 by two-way ANOVA) increased the frequencies of both the H2B-GFP− frequently cycling HSCs and the H2B-GFPhi infrequently cycling HSCs in every pair of mice we examined (n=8) (Figure 3b). There was a corresponding significant decrease in the frequency of H2B-GFPlo HSCs in Nras mice.
Figure 3
Nras has a bimodal effect on HSC cycling
a) GFP expression in HSCs from Mx1-cre; Nras; Col1A1-H2B-GFP; Rosa26-M2-rtTA mice (G12D/+) and littermate controls (control) without doxycycline treatment (n=3, left), or after 6 weeks of doxycycline treatment (n=3, right). b) GFP expression in HSCs from age and sex-matched pairs of Nras and control mice after labeling followed by 12 weeks of chase without doxycycline (n=8 pairs of mice from 8 independent experiments; p<0.05 by two-way ANOVA and posthoc pairwise t-tests). Despite overlapping standard deviations, differences were statistically significant in pairwise t-tests because the frequencies of H2B-GFP− HSCs and H2B-GFPhi HSCs were always higher in the Nras mice. c) GFP expression in HSCs from pairs of age and sex-matched Nras and control mice after 15 weeks of chase without doxycycline (n=7 mice from 5 independent experiments). Nras mice always had higher frequencies of H2B-GFPhi HSCs (p<0.05 by pairwise t-tests). d) We transplanted 15 CD150+CD48−LSK H2B-GFPhi HSCs, 50 H2B-GFPlo HSCs, or 75 H2B-GFP− HSCs from Nras or littermate control mice after 12 weeks of chase into irradiated wild-type recipients along with 3×105 recipient bone marrow cells (2 independent experiments with a total of 7 recipients/genotype). Data represent mean±s.d.. Unless otherwise stated, two-tailed student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
Extended data Figure 6
Nras had a bimodal effect on HSC cycling but increased the rate at which MPPs divide
a) Flow cytometric analysis of GFP expression in whole bone marrow cells from Nras or littermate control mice after 12 weeks of chase without doxycycline. b) Median GFP fluorescence intensity of H2B-GFP−, H2B-GFPlo and H2B-GFPhi HSCs from wild type and Nras mice (n=8 mice/genotype). GFP levels in control HSCs were set to one for comparison to relative levels in Nras HSCs. c) NrasG12D increased the rate of division by MPPs. Flow cytometric analysis of GFP expression in CD150−CD48−LSK MPPs from Mx1-cre; Nras; Col1A1-H2B-GFP; Rosa26-M2-rtTA mice (G12D/+) and littermate controls (con) after 12 weeks of chase(n=8 mice/genotype). Relative to control MPPs, Nras MPPs included significantly more H2B-GFP− frequently cycling cells and significantly fewer H2B-GFPlo MPPs (p<0.05 by two-way ANOVA and posthoc pairwise t-tests). d) We continuously administered BrdU to Mx1-cre; Nras versus control mice for 1 to 30 days and determined the frequency of BrdU+ HSCs (1 day BrdU data are from Figure 1a). Data represent mean±s.d.. Two-tailed student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance unless stated otherwise. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
The median level of GFP fluorescence in H2B-GFP− HSCs was significantly lower in Nras as compared to control mice (Extended data Figure 6b), suggesting that H2B-GFP−
Nras HSCs underwent more rounds of division on average. In contrast, the median level of GFP fluorescence in H2B-GFPhi HSCs was significantly higher in Nras as compared to control mice (Extended data Figure 6b), suggesting that H2B-GFPhi
Nras HSCs tended to divide less than control H2B-GFPhi HSCs on average. Nras thus had a bimodal effect, increasing the division of some HSCs and reducing the division of other HSCs.We followed another cohort of age and sex-matched pairs of Mx1-cre; Nras and control mice for 15 weeks after doxycycline removal. In five independent experiments, Nras significantly increased the frequency of H2B-GFPhi HSCs in every pair of mice we examined (n=7; p<0.05) (Figure 3c). We observed increased frequencies of H2B-GFP− HSCs in the Nras mice from some pairs but not others, and overall the effect was not statistically significant (Figure 3c). Since the rapidly dividing subset of Nras HSCs differentiates more quickly than control HSCs (Figure 3d), prolonged periods of chase after H2B-GFP labeling may not be appropriate to quantify the frequency of these cells. Nras significantly increased the rate at which MPPs divided (Extended data Figure 6c).To test the relationship between division history and competitiveness we transplanted 15 CD150+CD48−LSK H2B-GFPhi HSCs, 50 H2B-GFPlo moderately cycling HSCs, or 75 H2B-GFP− frequently cycling HSCs from Nras or control donor mice after 12 weeks of chase into irradiated wild-type recipients along with 3×105 recipient bone marrow cells. The Nras H2B-GFP− frequently cycling HSCs gave significantly lower levels of donor cell reconstitution, at least in the myeloid lineages, as compared to control H2B-GFP− HSCs (Figure 3d). In contrast, the Nras H2B-GFPlo and H2B-GFPhi HSCs gave significantly (p<0.05) higher levels of donor cell reconstitution in all lineages than the control H2B-GFPlo and H2B-GFPhi HSCs (Figure 3d). Nras thus reduced the division and increased the competitiveness of some HSCs while increasing the division and reducing the competitiveness of other HSCs.We continuously administered BrdU to Mx1-cre; Nras versus control mice beginning two weeks after pIpC treatment. We assessed the frequency of BrdU+ HSCs after 4, 10, 20, and 30 days of BrdU treatment (Extended data Figure 6d). Relative to control HSCs, significantly more Mx1-cre; Nras HSCs incorporated BrdU after 4 (32±0.1% versus 24±1.2%, p<0.01) and 10 (64±5.9% versus 45±3.6%, p<0.02) days of BrdU administration. In contrast, significantly fewer Mx1-cre; Nras HSCs incorporated BrdU after 20 (78±4.7% versus 86±0.7%, p<0.05) and 30 (86±3.4% versus 92±4.8%, p<0.02) days of BrdU administration. These data are consistent with the H2B-GFP label retention data in demonstrating that some Nras HSCs divide more frequently while other Nras HSCs divide less frequently than control HSCs.We detected the activation of the canonical Ras effector, ERK, in bone marrow cells from Mx1-cre; Nras and Mx1-cre; Nras mice but not in LSK stem/progenitor cells or Lineage−c-kit+Sca-1− myeloid progenitors (Extended data Figure 8a). We treated Mx1-cre; Nras or control mice with the MEK inhibitors, PD0325901 (5mg/kg/day) or AZD6244 (25mg/kg/day), and assessed the effects on BrdU incorporation in CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs. After eight days of treatment, splenocytes from PD0325901-treated mice of both genotypes showed reduced pERK levels (Extended data Figure 8b), but this did not affect the increased rate of BrdU incorporation by Nras HSCs (Extended data Figure 8c). In contrast, when we performed the same experiments with AZD6244, pERK activation was completely blocked in bone marrow and spleen (Extended data Figure 8d) and the increased cycling of Nras HSCs was abolished (Supplementary figure 8e). These data suggest that the more stringent inhibition of pERK activation by AZD6244 blocks the effect of Nras on HSC cycling.
Extended data Figure 8
Nras activation increases STAT5 phosphorylation
a) Western blot for phosphorylated ERK (pERK) in LSK stem/progenitor cells, Lin−c-kit+Sca1− progenitor cells, or whole bone marrow (WBM) cells from Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) mice, Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/G12D) mice, or littermate controls 2 weeks after pIpC treatment b) Western blot of pERK and total ERK in 106 uncultured splenocytes from Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or control mice after 8 days treatment with PD0325901 MEK inhibitor or vehicle (blot is representative of four independent experiments). c) The frequency of BrdU+ CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs after a 24-hour pulse of BrdU to Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or control mice after 7 days of PD0325901 MEK inhibitor or vehicle (mean±s.d. from four experiments). d) Western blot of pERK and total ERK in 106 uncultured bone marrow cells from Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or control mice after 8 days of AZD6244 MEK inhibitor or vehicle (blot is representative of four independent experiments). e) The frequency of BrdU+ CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs after a 24-hour pulse of BrdU to Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or control mice after 7 days of AZD6244 MEK inhibitor or vehicle (mean±s.d. from four experiments). f) Western blot for phosphorylated Akt (pAkt) in CD48−LSK HSCs/MPPs, CD48+LSK progenitors, or WBM cells from Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) mice, Mx1-cre; Pten (Pten−/−) mice, or littermate controls 2 weeks after pIpC treatment. g) Socs2 transcript levels in HSCs and MPPs from Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or control mice by microarray analysis (top, n=3) and qRT-PCR (bottom, n=7). h, i) Socs2 transcript levels in GFP− and GFPhigh HSCs from Mx1-cre; Nras; Col1A1-H2B-GFP; Rosa26-M2-rtTA mice and littermate controls by microarray (h, n=3) and qRT-PCR (, n=3). j) Western blotting showed that pSTAT5 levels were significantly increased in CD48−LSK HSCs/MPPs from Mx1-cre; Nras mice as compared to control mice. Left panel shows western blots of pSTAT5 and total STAT5 from two independent experiments. Right panel shows quantification of pSTAT5 levels from western blots from three independent experiments (signals were quantitated using NIH ImageJ software). Blot 1 was shown in Figure 4e. k) Western blot showed that STAT5 levels were reduced in CD48−LSK HSCs/MPPs from Mx1-cre; Stat5ab−/+ or Mx1-cre; Nras; Stat5ab−/+ mice as compared to control and Mx1-cre; Nras mice (blot is representative of four independent experiments). l) BrdU incorporation into common myeloid progenitors (CMPs; Lin−Sca1−ckit+CD34+CD16/32−), granulocyte macrophage progenitors (GMPs; Lin−Sca1−ckit+CD34+CD16/32+), and megakaryocyte erythroid progenitors (MEPs; Lin−Sca1−ckit+CD34−CD16/32−) from control, Mx1-cre; Stat5ab−/+, Mx1-cre; Nras, or Mx1-cre; Nras; Stat5ab−/+ mice after a 2.5 hour pulse of BrdU (n=4 mice/treatment). Data represent mean±s.d.. Two-tailed student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance.
We did not detect increased Akt (Extended data Figure 8f), S6, or p38 (Figure 4a) phosphorylation in whole bone marrow cells, CD48−LSK cells (HSCs and MPPs) or CD48+LSK cells (mainly restricted progenitors[22]) from Mx1-cre; Nras mice.
Figure 4
Increased STAT5 activation mediates the effect of NrasG12D/+ on HSCs
Western blots for pSTAT3, pp38, pS6, and ß-actin (a) and pSTAT5, total STAT5 and ß-actin (b) (two additional experiments are shown in Supplementary figure 8j). Cells were stimulated in culture with SCF and TPO for 30 minutes before protein extraction. c) The frequency of BrdU+CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs after a 24-hour pulse of BrdU to Mx1-cre; Stat5ab (Stat5ab−/+) mice, Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) mice, Mx1-cre; Nras; Stat5ab (G12D/+; Stat5ab−/+) compound mutant mice, or control mice (n=4). d) 5×105 donor bone marrow cells from mice of each genotype were transplanted into irradiated recipients along with 5×105 recipient bone marrow cells (2 independent experiments with a total of 8 recipients/genotype). Data represent mean±s.d.. Two-tailed student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance.
We performed gene expression profiling of H2B-GFP− and H2B-GFPhi CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs from 3 pairs of Mx1-cre; Nras; Col1A1-H2B-GFP; Rosa26-M2-rtTA mice and littermate controls 12 weeks after removal of doxycycline. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed that cell cycle genes were significantly enriched in H2B-GFP−
Nras HSCs as compared to H2B-GFP− control HSCs (p<0.0001) but not in H2B-GFPhi
Nras HSCs as compared to H2B-GFPhi control HSCs (Extended data Figure 7d). DNA replication genes and RNA polymerase genes were significantly enriched in H2B-GFP−
Nras HSCs as compared to H2B-GFP− control HSCs (p<0.05) but were significantly depleted in H2B-GFPhi
Nras HSCs as compared to H2B-GFPhi control HSCs (p<0.01; Extended data Figure 7e, 7f). These data demonstrate different transcriptional responses to Nras activation in H2B-GFP− as compared to H2B-GFPhi HSCs: genes associated with cell cycling were induced by Nras activation in the H2B-GFP− HSCs but repressed by Nras activation in the H2B-GFPhi HSCs.
Extended data Figure 7
Gene expression profiling demonstrates different transcriptional responses to Nras activation in quiescent as compared to frequently dividing HSCs
a) CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs and CD150−CD48−LSK MPPs were isolated from three pairs of Mx1-cre; Nras and littermate controls and gene expression profiling was performed with Affymetrix mouse genome 430 2.0 microarrays. The Venn diagram shows the number of genes that were differentially expressed between Nras and controls cells within each cell population (fold change≥2). b) Venn diagram of genes that were differentially expressed between Nras and control GFP− HSCs and GFPhigh HSCs isolated from 3 pairs of Mx1-cre; Nras; Col1A1-H2B-GFP; Rosa26-M2-rtTA mice and littermate controls (fold change ≥and p value ≤0.05). c) Genes that were consistently increased or decreased in expression in response to Nras activation in HSCs, MPPs, GFP− HSCs, and GFPhigh HSCs (fold change≥2 and p≤0.05 in each cell population). d, e, f) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of cell cycle genes d), DNA replication genes e) and RNA polymerase genes f).
Only two genes showed a similar change in expression with Nras activation in all of the multipotent cells we studied (p≤0.05 and fold change≥2; Extended data Figure 7a–c). One of these, Suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 (Socs2), was significantly reduced in expression in Nras as compared to control cells by microarray and qRT-PCR (Extended data Figure 7c and 8g–i). SOCS2 negatively regulates STAT signaling in hematopoietic cells [23,24]. We observed an increase in phosphorylated STAT5, but not STAT3, levels in Nras as compared to control CD48−LSK cells, without affecting total STAT5 levels (Figure 4a, 4b, and Extended data Figure 8j).To test whether the increased STAT5 phosphorylation in Nras CD48−LSK cells increased HSC proliferation and self-renewal we mated Stat5ab mice [25] with Mx1-cre; Nras mice. Two weeks after finishing pIpC treatment, western blot of sorted CD48−LSK cells confirmed that deletion of one allele of Stat5ab in Nras HSCs reduced the levels of pSTAT5 and total STAT5 (Extended data Figure 8k). Stat5ab−/+ HSCs exhibited normal BrdU incorporation and Nras HSCs exhibited increased proliferation relative to control HSCs (Figure 4c). Deletion of one allele of Stat5ab in Nras HSCs significantly reduced the rate of BrdU incorporation (p<0.05). A reduction in STAT5 levels thus rescued the effects of NrasG12D on HSC cycling. Neither deletion of Stat5ab nor activation of Nras significantly affected BrdU incorporation by the myeloid progenitors we examined (Extended data Figure 8l).We next transplanted 5×105 whole bone marrow cells from control, Mx-1-Cre; Nras (NrasG12D/+), Mx-1-Cre; Stat5a/b−/+ (Stat5ab−/+), or Mx-1-Cre; Nras; Stat5a/b−/+ (double mutant) donors (2 weeks after finishing pIpC treatment) into irradiated wild-type recipients along with 5×105 recipient bone marrow cells. Nras cells gave significantly higher levels of reconstitution than control cells in all lineages for at least 20 weeks after transplantation (Figure 4d). Loss of one Stat5ab allele (Stat5ab+/−) reduced the level of reconstitution by donor cells relative to control cells but the difference was not statistically significant. In contrast, loss of a single allele of Stat5ab in the Nras background completely blocked the increased reconstitution by Nras cells such that levels of donor cell reconstitution were indistinguishable from control cells (Figure 4d). An increase in STAT5 signaling is therefore required for increased competitiveness by Nras HSCs.Nras is likely an early mutation in some leukemias as it is widely observed in both MPN and myeloid leukemias[2] and Nras mutations in mice lead only to a late onset MPN with prolonged survival[16,17]. NRAS and KRAS mutations are frequently among the first mutations observed in pre-leukemic clones that precede CMML[26]. Some JMML patients undergo remission, with or without therapy, yet continue to carry NRAS mutations in their hematopoietic cells[27,28]. Germline NRAS mutations have also been reported in JMML patients [29], or patients with Noonan syndrome that develop JMML[30]. The evidence that NRAS mutations can be found in normal hematopoietic cells, despite predisposing for the development of neoplasms, is consistent with our conclusion that they promote pre-leukemic clonal expansion.Our data provide a molecular explanation for how pre-leukemic clonal expansion may occur. Nras has a bimodal effect on HSCs, increasing self-renewal potential and reducing division in one subset of HSCs while increasing division and reducing self-renewal in another subset of HSCs. Short-lived but rapidly dividing Nras HSCs presumably outcompete wild-type HSCs and are replenished over time by quiescent Nras HSCs that are slowly recruited into cycle. It will be interesting to determine whether the ability to induce bimodal responses in stem cell pools is a common feature of mutations that promote pre-malignant clonal expansion.
EXTENDED DATA
METHODS
Mice
All mice were housed in the Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine at the University of Michigan and protocols were approved by the University of Michigan Committee on the Use and Care of Animals. Nras, Stat5ab+/− 25, Col1A1-H2B-GFP; Rosa26-M2-rtTA[4], Vav1-Cre, and Mx-1-Cre mice were backcrossed for at least 10 generations onto a C57BL/Ka-CD45.2:Thy-1.1 background. Recipients in reconstitution assays were adult C57BL/Ka-CD45.1:Thy-1.2 mice, at least 8 weeks old at the time of irradiation. pIpC (Amersham) was reconstituted in PBS and administered at 0.5 μg/gram body mass/day by intraperitoneal injection. BrdU (Sigma) was administered as a single dose of 200mg/kg body mass by intraperitoneal injection followed by 1mg/ml BrdU in the drinking water. For long term BrdU administration, BrdU water was changed every 3 days. Doxycycline (Research Products International Corporation) was added to the water at a concentration of 0.2% (m/v) along with 1% sucrose (Fisher).
Statistical Methods
Multiple independent experiments were performed to verify the reproducibility of all experimental findings. Group data always represents mean±standard deviation. Unless otherwise indicated, two-tailed Student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance. No randomization or blinding was used in any experiments. Experimental mice were not excluded in any experiments. In the case of measurements in which variation among experiments tends to be low (e.g. HSC frequency) we generally examined 3–6 mice. In the case of measurements in which variation among experiments tends to be higher (e.g. reconstitution assays) we examined larger numbers of mice (7–20).
PCR of genomic DNA for genotyping
To assess the degree of Nras recombination in HSCs from Mx1-cre; Nras mice after pIpC treatment, bone marrow cells were harvested and stained for surface markers as described above. Single HSCs (CD150+CD48−LSK cells) were sorted into 96 well plates containing methylcellulose medium (M3434, Stem Cell Technologies) and incubated for 14 days at 37°C. Cells from each colony were re-suspended in PBS then incubated with alkaline lysis buffer (25 mM NaOH, 0.2 mM EDTA), boiled, then neutralized by addition of an equal volume of neutralizing buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl). The neutralized extract was used for PCR with the following primers: F2: 5' - aga cgc gga gac ttg gcg agc - 3'; R1: 5' - gct gga tcg tca agg cgc ttt tcc - 3'. To genotype mouse tail DNA for the presence of the Nras allele, primers R1 and F2 were used in addition to primer SD5', 5' - agc tag cca cca tgg ctt gag taa gtc tgc a - 3'. To genotype for the presence of the Mx1-cre transgene, primers F1 and R1 were used: F1 5'-att gct gtc act tgg tcg tgg c-3', R1 5'-gaa aat gct tct gtc cgt ttg c-3'. To check the presence of the Rosa26-M2-rtTA transgene, the following primers were used: 5' Aaa gtc gct ctg agt tgt tat 3'; 5' Gcg aag agt ttg tcc tca acc 3'; and 5' Gga gcg gga gaa atg gat atg 3'. To genotype mice for the presence of the Col1A1-H2B-GFP transgene, the following primers were used: 5' ctg aag ttc atc tgc acc acc 3', 5' gaa gtt gta ctc cag ctt gtg c 3'. To genotype mice for the deletion of Stat5ab, the following primers were used: 5' gaa agc agc atg aaa ggg ttg gag 3'; 5' agc agc aac cag agg act ac 3'; and 5' aag tta tct cga gtt agt cag g 3'.
Flow cytometry and HSC isolation
Bone marrow cells were flushed from the long bones (tibias and femurs) with Hank's buffered salt solution without calcium or magnesium, supplemented with 2% heat-inactivated calf serum (HBSS; Invitrogen). Cells were triturated and filtered through nylon screen (70 mm; Sefar America) to obtain a single-cell suspension. CD150+CD48−Lin−Sca1+c-kit+ HSCs and CD150−CD48−Lin−Sca1+c-kit+ MPPs were isolated as previously described[21,22]. For isolation of HSCs, whole bone marrow cells were incubated with antibodies to lineage (Lin) markers including B220 (6B2), CD3 (KT31.1), CD5 (53-7.3), CD8 (53-6.7), Gr-1 (8C5), CD41 (MWReg30) and Ter119 (Ter-119) that were conjugated to FITC, anti-CD150 antibody (TC15-12F12.2) conjugated to PE, anti-CD48 antibody (HM48-1) conjugated to PE-Cy7, anti-c-kit antibody (2B8) conjugated to APC, and anti-Sca1 antibody (D7) conjugated to PerCP/Cy5.5 (all antibodies were purchased from Biolegend). After washing, cells were incubated with anti-APC conjugated to paramagnetic microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). The microbead bound (c-kit+) cells were then enriched using LS columns (Miltenyi Biotec). To identify CD45.2+ HSCs, antibodies against CD45.2 (104-FITC; BioLegend) and CD45.1 (A20-APC780, BioLegend) were used. Non-viable cells were excluded from sorts and analyses using the viability dye 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (1 μg/ml). BrdU incorporation in vivo was measured by flow cytometry using the APC BrdU Flow Kit (BD Biosciences). To perform Pyronin Y and DAPI staining, CD150+CD48–LSK HSCs were sorted into 100% Ethanol and placed in the cold room overnight. The cells were then washed with PBS and stained with Pyronin Y (1ug/ml) and DAPI (10ug/ml) for 30 minutes before flow cytometric analysis
Long-term competitive repopulation assay
Adult recipient mice (CD45.1) were irradiated with an Orthovoltage X-ray source delivering approximately 300 rad min−1 in two equal doses of 540 rad, delivered at least 2 h apart. Cells were injected into the retro-orbital venous sinus of anaesthetized recipients. Beginning 4 weeks after transplantation and continuing for at least 16 weeks, blood was obtained from the tail veins of recipient mice, subjected to ammonium-chloride potassium red cell lysis, and stained with directly conjugated antibodies to CD45.2 (104), CD45.1 (A20), B220 (6B2), Mac-1 (M1/70), CD3 (KT31.1) and Gr-1 (8C5) to monitor engraftment.
BrdU incorporation by myeloid progenitors
Two and a half hours after BrdU administration, whole bone marrow cells were incubated first with anti-ckit antibody conjugated to biotin (2B8) then with antibodies to lineage (Lin) markers including B220 (6B2), CD3 (KT31.1), CD5 (53-7.3), CD8 (53-6.7), Gr-1 (8C5), CD41 (MWReg30) and Ter119 (Ter-119) that were conjugated to phycoerythrin (PE), anti-CD34 antibody (eBioscience, RAM34) conjugated to FITC, anti-CD16/CD32 antibody (93) conjugated to PE-Cy7, streptavidin conjugated to Alexa700 (Invitrogen S21383), and anti-Sca1 antibody (D7) conjugated to PerCP/Cy5.5 (all antibodies were purchased from Biolegend unless otherwise stated). BrdU incorporation was measured by flow cytometry using the APC BrdU Flow Kit (BD Biosciences).
Western blotting
The same number of cells (30,000 cells for CD48−LSK cells or CD48+LSK cells; 100,000 cells for LSK or Lineage−ckit+Sca-1− cells) from each population to be analysed were sorted into HBSS with 2% FCS. The cells were then washed and incubated with 100ng/ml TPO and 100ng/ml SCF at 37°C for 30 minutes. The cells then were washed with PBS and precipitated with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) at a final concentration of 10% TCA. Extracts were incubated on ice for 15 min and spun down for 10 min at 16,100g at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed and the pellets were washed with acetone twice then dried. The protein pellets were solubilized with solubilization buffer (9 M urea, 2% Triton X-100, 1% DTT) before adding LDS loading buffer (Invitrogen). Proteins were separated on a Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gel (Invitrogen) and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore). All antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling technology. These include anti-pERK (T202/Y204), anti-pAkt (T308), anti-pS6 (S240/244), anti-pStat5 (Y694), anti-Stat3 (Y705), anti-ERK (137F5), anti-Stat5 (3H7), anti-pp38 (T180/Y182) and anti-β-actin (8H10D10).
Gene expression profiling
CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs and CD150−CD48−LSK MPPs were isolated by flow cytometry. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol (Invitrogen) followed by Qiagen RNeasy Micro kit purification according to the manufacturer's protocols. For microarray analysis, reverse transcription and linear amplification was performed on total RNA using the NuGen Ovation pico WTA system version 2 and then purified with the Qiaquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen). Six micrograms of amplified cDNAs were labeled with biotin using the Encore Biotin Module (NuGen) and submitted to the Microarray Core Facility of the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center for hybridization to Affymetrix Mouse Genome 430 2.0 Arrays. Statistical analyses were performed using R[33] version 2.15.2 and Bioconductor version 2.11[34]. Gene expression signals were normalized to the trimmed average of 500 using the Affymetrix MAS 5.0 algorithm. MAS5 signals less than 2 were set to 2 before log2 transformation. Probe sets with MAS5 absent calls for all samples were excluded. Differential expression analysis was performed by limma[35] with estimation of fold change. Probe sets with limma p-value<0.05 and fold change>2 were considered differentially expressed. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis[36] was used to assess pathway enrichment. Gene expression data have been deposited to the Gene Expression Omnibus (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/; accession number GSE45194).
Quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was collected as described above and reverse transcription was performed with the High Capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems). Real time PCR was performed with Absolute Sybr Green Rox mix (Thermo Scientific) using an ABI 7300 PCR machine. RNA from 100 cells was used for each reaction. Transcript levels were normalized to β-actin.a) The Nras allele was recombined in all HSCs after 3 doses (every other day) of pIpC. Two weeks after the last dose of pIpC was administered to Mx1-cre; Nras mice, the mice were sacrificed and individual CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs were sorted into methylcellulose cultures in 96 well plates. The cells were cultured for 14 days then DNA was extracted from individual colonies and genotyped by PCR. The size of the recombined Nras allele (G12D) was 550bp and the Nras+ allele (WT) was 500bp. Nras recombination was observed in 22 of 22 HSC colonies examined. Blot is representative of three independent experiments. b) Cell cycle analysis of HSCs by pyronin Y and DAPI staining. CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs were sorted from Mx1-cre; Nras mice and littermate controls into 100% ethanol and stained with pyronin Y and DAPI to identify cells in G0 (left lower quadrant), G1 (left upper quadrant) and S/G2/M (right upper and lower quadrants). Data represent mean±s.d.. Statistical analysis was performed with a two-way ANOVA (P<0.01, n=4) followed by pairwise posthoc t-tests.
HSC competitiveness is increased in Vav1-Cre; Nras mice
a) Frequencies of CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs, CD150−CD48−LSK MPPs, and LSK cells in the bone marrow (BM, top row) and spleen (sp, bottom row) of Vav1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or littermate control (con) mice (n=4) at 6-10 weeks of age. b) 5×105 donor bone marrow cells from Vav1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or littermate control (con) mice at 6-10 weeks of age were transplanted into irradiated recipient mice along with 5×105 recipient bone marrow cells (3 donors/genotype were each transplanted into 4 recipients/donor). c) Secondary transplantation of 3×106 bone marrow cells from primary recipient mice in Extended data Figure 2b at 20 weeks after transplantation (2 primary recipients/genotype were each transplanted into 4 secondary recipients/primary recipient). Data represent mean±s.d.. Two-tailed student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
HSCs from Mx1-cre; Nras mice were not immortalized
A fifth round of serial transplantation of 3×106 bone marrow cells from the quaternary recipients of Nras (G12D/+) bone marrow cells shown in Figure 2c showed that the Nras HSCs eventually exhausted all of their HSCs and MPPs and were able to only give low levels of lymphoid reconstitution. Four donor mice from Figure 2c were transplanted 20 weeks after the fourth round of transplantation into 4 recipients per quaternary donor. The data represent mean±s.d. for donor blood cells in the myeloid (Gr-1+ or Mac-1+ cells), B (B220+), and T (CD3+) cell lineages.
Nras (G12D/+) expression increased the reconstituting potential of CD150−CD48+LSK MPPs but did not affect the reconstituting potential of CD150+CD48+LSK, or CD150−CD48+LSK progenitors in irradiated mice
a) 10 donor MPPs, b) 25 CD150+CD48+LSK progenitors, or c) 100 CD150−CD48+LSK progenitors from Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or littermate control (con) mice at 2 weeks after pIpC treatment were transplanted into irradiated recipient mice along with 3×105 recipient bone marrow cells. Data represent mean±s.d. for donor blood cells in the myeloid (Gr-1+ or Mac-1+ cells), B (B220+), and T (CD3+) cell lineages. Two-tailed student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance. None of the time points were significantly different between treatments. The data represent two independent experiments with 4 recipient mice per donor
Nras-induced changes in HSC function were not associated with the development of leukemia
White blood counts (WBC), hemoglobulin (Hb) levels, platelet counts, and spleen masses for recipient mice from primary transplants (a; from Figure 1d), secondary transplants (b; from Figure 2a), tertiary transplants (c; from Figure 2b) and quaternary transplants (d; from Figure 2c). In all cases, these blood cell counts were collected from mice after the analysis of blood cell reconstitution was complete (at least 20 weeks after transplantation). The transplanted mice were observed for a median time of 260 (162–315) days for primary recipient mice, 194 (122–264) days for secondary recipient mice, 224 (176–336) days for tertiary recipient mice, and 280 (279–280) days for quaternary recipient mice. We never observed evidence of leukemia or MPN by histology in these mice. Across all of the experiments, only two recipients of Nras cells and two recipients of control cells died spontaneously. Data represent mean±s.d.. Two-tailed student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance and none of the comparisons showed significant difference.
Nras had a bimodal effect on HSC cycling but increased the rate at which MPPs divide
a) Flow cytometric analysis of GFP expression in whole bone marrow cells from Nras or littermate control mice after 12 weeks of chase without doxycycline. b) Median GFP fluorescence intensity of H2B-GFP−, H2B-GFPlo and H2B-GFPhi HSCs from wild type and Nras mice (n=8 mice/genotype). GFP levels in control HSCs were set to one for comparison to relative levels in Nras HSCs. c) NrasG12D increased the rate of division by MPPs. Flow cytometric analysis of GFP expression in CD150−CD48−LSK MPPs from Mx1-cre; Nras; Col1A1-H2B-GFP; Rosa26-M2-rtTA mice (G12D/+) and littermate controls (con) after 12 weeks of chase(n=8 mice/genotype). Relative to control MPPs, Nras MPPs included significantly more H2B-GFP− frequently cycling cells and significantly fewer H2B-GFPlo MPPs (p<0.05 by two-way ANOVA and posthoc pairwise t-tests). d) We continuously administered BrdU to Mx1-cre; Nras versus control mice for 1 to 30 days and determined the frequency of BrdU+ HSCs (1 day BrdU data are from Figure 1a). Data represent mean±s.d.. Two-tailed student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance unless stated otherwise. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
Gene expression profiling demonstrates different transcriptional responses to Nras activation in quiescent as compared to frequently dividing HSCs
a) CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs and CD150−CD48−LSK MPPs were isolated from three pairs of Mx1-cre; Nras and littermate controls and gene expression profiling was performed with Affymetrix mouse genome 430 2.0 microarrays. The Venn diagram shows the number of genes that were differentially expressed between Nras and controls cells within each cell population (fold change≥2). b) Venn diagram of genes that were differentially expressed between Nras and control GFP− HSCs and GFPhigh HSCs isolated from 3 pairs of Mx1-cre; Nras; Col1A1-H2B-GFP; Rosa26-M2-rtTA mice and littermate controls (fold change ≥and p value ≤0.05). c) Genes that were consistently increased or decreased in expression in response to Nras activation in HSCs, MPPs, GFP− HSCs, and GFPhigh HSCs (fold change≥2 and p≤0.05 in each cell population). d, e, f) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of cell cycle genes d), DNA replication genes e) and RNA polymerase genes f).
Nras activation increases STAT5 phosphorylation
a) Western blot for phosphorylated ERK (pERK) in LSK stem/progenitor cells, Lin−c-kit+Sca1− progenitor cells, or whole bone marrow (WBM) cells from Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) mice, Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/G12D) mice, or littermate controls 2 weeks after pIpC treatment b) Western blot of pERK and total ERK in 106 uncultured splenocytes from Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or control mice after 8 days treatment with PD0325901 MEK inhibitor or vehicle (blot is representative of four independent experiments). c) The frequency of BrdU+ CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs after a 24-hour pulse of BrdU to Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or control mice after 7 days of PD0325901 MEK inhibitor or vehicle (mean±s.d. from four experiments). d) Western blot of pERK and total ERK in 106 uncultured bone marrow cells from Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or control mice after 8 days of AZD6244 MEK inhibitor or vehicle (blot is representative of four independent experiments). e) The frequency of BrdU+ CD150+CD48−LSK HSCs after a 24-hour pulse of BrdU to Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or control mice after 7 days of AZD6244 MEK inhibitor or vehicle (mean±s.d. from four experiments). f) Western blot for phosphorylated Akt (pAkt) in CD48−LSK HSCs/MPPs, CD48+LSK progenitors, or WBM cells from Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) mice, Mx1-cre; Pten (Pten−/−) mice, or littermate controls 2 weeks after pIpC treatment. g) Socs2 transcript levels in HSCs and MPPs from Mx1-cre; Nras (G12D/+) or control mice by microarray analysis (top, n=3) and qRT-PCR (bottom, n=7). h, i) Socs2 transcript levels in GFP− and GFPhigh HSCs from Mx1-cre; Nras; Col1A1-H2B-GFP; Rosa26-M2-rtTA mice and littermate controls by microarray (h, n=3) and qRT-PCR (, n=3). j) Western blotting showed that pSTAT5 levels were significantly increased in CD48−LSK HSCs/MPPs from Mx1-cre; Nras mice as compared to control mice. Left panel shows western blots of pSTAT5 and total STAT5 from two independent experiments. Right panel shows quantification of pSTAT5 levels from western blots from three independent experiments (signals were quantitated using NIH ImageJ software). Blot 1 was shown in Figure 4e. k) Western blot showed that STAT5 levels were reduced in CD48−LSK HSCs/MPPs from Mx1-cre; Stat5ab−/+ or Mx1-cre; Nras; Stat5ab−/+ mice as compared to control and Mx1-cre; Nras mice (blot is representative of four independent experiments). l) BrdU incorporation into common myeloid progenitors (CMPs; Lin−Sca1−ckit+CD34+CD16/32−), granulocyte macrophage progenitors (GMPs; Lin−Sca1−ckit+CD34+CD16/32+), and megakaryocyte erythroid progenitors (MEPs; Lin−Sca1−ckit+CD34−CD16/32−) from control, Mx1-cre; Stat5ab−/+, Mx1-cre; Nras, or Mx1-cre; Nras; Stat5ab−/+ mice after a 2.5 hour pulse of BrdU (n=4 mice/treatment). Data represent mean±s.d.. Two-tailed student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance.
Authors: Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Omer H Yilmaz; Riccardo Valdez; Brian K Theisen; Wei Guo; David O Ferguson; Hong Wu; Sean J Morrison Journal: Nature Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Marieke A G Essers; Sandra Offner; William E Blanco-Bose; Zoe Waibler; Ulrich Kalinke; Michel A Duchosal; Andreas Trumpp Journal: Nature Date: 2009-02-11 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Fulu Liu; Ghada Kunter; Maxwell M Krem; William C Eades; Jennifer A Cain; Michael H Tomasson; Lothar Hennighausen; Daniel C Link Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Nikesh Kotecha; Nikki J Flores; Jonathan M Irish; Erin F Simonds; Debbie S Sakai; Sophie Archambeault; Ernesto Diaz-Flores; Marc Coram; Kevin M Shannon; Garry P Nolan; Mignon L Loh Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Jae Y Lee; Daisuke Nakada; Omer H Yilmaz; Zuzana Tothova; Nancy M Joseph; Megan S Lim; D Gary Gilliland; Sean J Morrison Journal: Cell Stem Cell Date: 2010-11-05 Impact factor: 24.633
Authors: Sun-Mi Park; Mithat Gönen; Ly Vu; Gerard Minuesa; Patrick Tivnan; Trevor S Barlowe; James Taggart; Yuheng Lu; Raquel P Deering; Nir Hacohen; Maria E Figueroa; Elisabeth Paietta; Hugo F Fernandez; Martin S Tallman; Ari Melnick; Ross Levine; Christina Leslie; Christopher J Lengner; Michael G Kharas Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Wen Bu; Zhenyu Liu; Weiyu Jiang; Chandandeep Nagi; Shixia Huang; Dean P Edwards; Eunji Jo; Qianxing Mo; Chad J Creighton; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Andrew D Leavitt; Michael T Lewis; Stephen T C Wong; Yi Li Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2018-11-06 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Guangyao Kong; Mark Wunderlich; David Yang; Erik A Ranheim; Ken H Young; Jinyong Wang; Yuan-I Chang; Juan Du; Yangang Liu; Sin Ruow Tey; Xinmin Zhang; Mark Juckett; Ryan Mattison; Alisa Damnernsawad; Jingfang Zhang; James C Mulloy; Jing Zhang Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Christian B Gocke; Ross McMillan; Qiuju Wang; Asma Begum; Vesselin R Penchev; Syed A Ali; Ivan Borrello; Carol Ann Huff; William Matsui Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 6.261