| Literature DB >> 24282338 |
Koichi Kawamoto1, Masamitsu Konno, Hiroaki Nagano, Shimpei Nishikawa, Yoshito Tomimaru, Hirofumi Akita, Naoki Hama, Hiroshi Wada, Shogo Kobayashi, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Masahiro Tanemura, Toshinori Ito, Yuichiro Doki, Masaki Mori, Hideshi Ishii.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), including adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSC), are multipotent and can differentiate into various cell types possessing unique immunomodulatory features. Several clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and possible efficacy of MSCs in organ transplantation. Thus, stem cell therapy is promising for tolerance induction. In this study, we assessed the reprogramming capacity of murine ADSCs and found that CD90 (Thy-1), originally discovered as a thymocyte antigen, could be a useful marker for cell therapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24282338 PMCID: PMC3824355 DOI: 10.1155/2013/392578
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Figure 1Lentiviral-mediated transfer of four iPS cell factor genes in murine ADSCs. A schematic representation of the experiment is shown. Cells were transduced with four factors (4F) after 24 h of incubation. Then, 4F-transduced cells were passaged to MMC-treated MEF feeder cells on day 5. The number of reprogrammed iPS colonies was assessed on posttransduction day 30 by AP staining.
Figure 24F transduction resulted in iPS colony formation in unsorted murine ADSCs. Phase (a and c) and AP staining (b and d) of pre- and post- (c and d) transduction were shown.
Figure 3CD90Hi and CD90Lo sorting. (a) Gates for CD90Hi (P7) and CD90Lo (P8) are shown. (b) Sorted cells showed similar morphologies 24 h after sorting. Then, the cells were transduced with 4F.
Figure 4Phenotypical analysis after in vitro culture of sorted ADSCs.
Figure 5Immunocytochemistry of iPS colonies.
Figure 6Colony formation of the sorted cells. Phase (a and b) and alkaline phosphatase staining (c and d) of CD90Lo (a and c) and CD90Hi (b and d) are shown.
Figure 7Relative reprogramming efficiency of sorted cells compared with unsorted controls.