| Literature DB >> 28579596 |
Harumichi Itoh1, Shimpei Nishikawa1, Tomoya Haraguchi1, Yu Arikawa1, Masato Hiyama2, Shotaro Eto2, Toshie Iseri3, Yoshiki Itoh3, Kenji Tani2, Munekazu Nakaichi3, Yasuho Taura2, Kazuhito Itamoto1.
Abstract
Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) are abundant and readily obtained, and have been studied for their clinical applicability in regenerative medicine. Some surface antigens have been identified as markers of different ADSC subpopulations in mice and humans. However, it is unclear whether functionally distinct subpopulations exist in dogs. To address this issue, we evaluated aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity-a widely used stem cell marker in mice and humans-by flow cytometry. Approximately 20% of bulk ADSCs showed high ALDH activity. Compared to cells with low activity (ALDHLo), the high-activity (ALDHHi) subpopulation exhibited a higher capacity for adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation. This is the first report of distinct ADSC subpopulations in dogs that differ in terms of adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation potential.Entities:
Keywords: adipogenic differentiation; adipose-derived stem cells; aldehyde dehydrogenase activity; flow cytometry; osteogenic differentiation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28579596 PMCID: PMC5627324 DOI: 10.1292/jvms.16-0503
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Med Sci ISSN: 0916-7250 Impact factor: 1.267
Fig. 1.Detection of ALDH-positive subpopulations of canine ADSCs and evaluation of proliferation rates. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of canine ADSCs. Baseline fluorescence was established by adding the ALDH inhibitor diethylaminobenzaldehyde (control). (B) Sorted ALDHHi and ALDHLo showed similar morphologies after incubation for 24 hr. (C) There was no significant difference in cell proliferation rates between ALDHHi and ALDHLo subpopulations. Values are expressed as mean ± standard error (n=5). *P<0.05 vs. control cells; ns, not significant.
Fig. 2.Differentiation potentials of ALDHHi ADSCs. FABP4 (A, B) and osteopontin (C, D) expression in ADSCs (red) following adipogenic (A, B) and osteogenic (C, D) differentiation of ALDHHi and ALDHLo subpopulations, as determined by immunocytochemistry. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue).
Fig. 3.Quantitative analysis of differentiation marker-positive areas in differentiated ADSCs. (A, B) FABP4-positive (A) and osteopontin-positive (B) area ratios relative to respective areas of nuclear staining for ALDHHi and ALDHLo subpopulations of ADSCs after adipogenic (A) and osteogenic (B) induction. Values are expressed as mean ± standard error (n=5). *P<0.05, ****P<0.0001; au, arbitrary unit.