Literature DB >> 24271037

Seeking balance: decision support needs of women without cancer and a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Meghan L Underhill1, Cheryl B Crotser.   

Abstract

Recommendations for women with a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation include complex medical approaches related to cancer risk reduction and detection. Current science has not yet fully elucidated decision support needs that women face when living with medical consequences associated with known hereditary cancer risk. The purpose of this study was to describe health communication and decision support needs in healthy women with BRCA1/2 gene mutations. The original researchers completed an interpretive secondary qualitative data analysis of 23 phenomenological narratives collected between 2008 and 2010. The Ottawa Decision Support and Patient Centered Communication frameworks guided the study design and analysis. Women described a pattern wherein breast and ovarian cancer risk, health related recommendations and decisions, and personal values were prioritized over time based on life contexts. Knowing versus acting on cancer risk was not a static process but an ongoing balancing act of considering current and future personal and medical values, further compounded by the complexity of recommendations. Women shared stories of anticipatory, physical and psychosocial consequences of the decision making experience. The findings have potential to generate future research questions and guide intervention development. Importantly, findings indicate a need for ongoing, long-term, support from genetics professionals and decision support interventions, which challenges the current practice paradigm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24271037      PMCID: PMC4138835          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9667-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  32 in total

1.  Women receiving news of a family BRCA1/2 mutation: messages of fear and empowerment.

Authors:  Cheryl B Crotser; Suzanne S Dickerson
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.176

2.  Decision-making process of women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who have chosen prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Megan McQuirter; Luisa Luciani Castiglia; Carmen G Loiselle; Nora Wong
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Learning about a twist in the road: perspectives of at-risk relatives learning of potential for cancer.

Authors:  Cheryl B Crotser; Suzanne S Dickerson
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and sexual health: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lori A Brotto; Nadia Branco; Cara Dunkley; Mary McCullum; Jessica N McAlpine
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2012-02

5.  Essential elements of genetic cancer risk assessment, counseling, and testing: updated recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Bronson D Riley; Julie O Culver; Cécile Skrzynia; Leigha A Senter; June A Peters; Josephine W Costalas; Faith Callif-Daley; Sherry C Grumet; Katherine S Hunt; Rebecca S Nagy; Wendy C McKinnon; Nancie M Petrucelli; Robin L Bennett; Angela M Trepanier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Carol L Bennett; Michael J Barry; Nananda F Col; Karen B Eden; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Anne Lyddiatt; France Légaré; Richard Thomson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-10-05

7.  Development and testing of a decision aid for breast cancer prevention for women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  K A Metcalfe; A Poll; A O'Connor; S Gershman; S Armel; A Finch; R Demsky; B Rosen; S A Narod
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  Female BRCA mutation carriers with a preference for prophylactic mastectomy are more likely to participate an educational-support group and to proceed with the preferred intervention within 2 years.

Authors:  Karin M Landsbergen; Judith B Prins; Yvonne J L Kamm; Han G Brunner; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Mortality after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Susan L Neuhausen; Theresa Wagner; Gareth Evans; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Mary B Daly; Rosalind Eeles; Ellen Matloff; Gail E Tomlinson; Laura Van't Veer; Henry T Lynch; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Barbara L Weber; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  NSGC practice guideline: risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Janice L Berliner; Angela Musial Fay; Shelly A Cummings; Brittany Burnett; Todd Tillmanns
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.537

View more
  10 in total

1.  Perspectives of Women Considering Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and their Peers towards a Telephone-Based Peer Support Intervention.

Authors:  D St-Pierre; K Bouchard; L Gauthier; J Chiquette; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Involvement and Influence of Healthcare Providers, Family Members, and Other Mutation Carriers in the Cancer Risk Management Decision-Making Process of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Athena Puski; Shelly Hovick; Leigha Senter; Amanda Ewart Toland
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Cancer Counseling of Low-Income Limited English Proficient Latina Women Using Medical Interpreters: Implications for Shared Decision-Making.

Authors:  Daniella Kamara; Jon Weil; Janey Youngblom; Claudia Guerra; Galen Joseph
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Systemic Barriers to Risk-Reducing Interventions for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Implications for Health Care Inequities.

Authors:  Kathleen F Mittendorf; Sarah Knerr; Tia L Kauffman; Nangel M Lindberg; Katherine P Anderson; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Marian J Gilmore; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Galen Joseph; Stephanie A Kraft; Jamilyn M Zepp; Sapna Syngal; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-11-03

5.  The needs of Southeast Asian BRCA mutation carriers considering risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Hamizah Sa'at; Yew-Kong Lee; Sook-Yee Yoon; Siu Wan Wong; Yin Ling Woo; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Nur Aishah Mohd Taib
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Understanding the Needs of Young Women Regarding Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Genetic Testing: Convergence and Divergence among Patient-Counselor Perceptions and the Promise of Peer Support.

Authors:  Chalanda Evans; Rebekah J Hamilton; Kenneth P Tercyak; Beth N Peshkin; Kantoniony Rabemananjara; Claudine Isaacs; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-28

7.  Evaluation of psychosocial aspects in participants of cancer genetic counseling.

Authors:  Leivy Patricia González-Ramírez; Reyna Martínez-Arriaga; Erendira Camacho-Cárdenas; Azucena Del Toro-Valero; Antonio Oceguera-Villanueva; Livia Zagamé; Aída Araceli Silva-García; Adrián Daneri-Navarro
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.857

8.  Evaluation of two evidence-based decision aids for female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in Germany: study protocol for a randomised controlled parallel-group trial.

Authors:  Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth; Marcus Redaèlli; Anna Isselhard; Arim Shukri; Andrea Vodermaier; Kerstin Rhiem; Rita Schmutzler; Stephanie Stock
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Development of decision aids for female BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers in Germany to support preference-sensitive decision-making.

Authors:  Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth; Marcus Redaèlli; Kerstin Rhiem; Andrea Vodermaier; Lisa Krassuski; Kathrin Nicolai; Miriam Schnepper; Violetta Kuboth; Julia Dick; Vera Vennedey; Regina Wiedemann; Rita Schmutzler; Stephanie Stock
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Predictors and interdependence of family support in a random sample of long-term young breast cancer survivors and their biological relatives.

Authors:  Maria C Katapodi; Katrina R Ellis; Franziska Schmidt; Christos Nikolaidis; Laurel L Northouse
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.452

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.