Literature DB >> 20439215

Decision-making process of women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who have chosen prophylactic mastectomy.

Megan McQuirter1, Luisa Luciani Castiglia, Carmen G Loiselle, Nora Wong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To explore the decision-making process of women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation who have chosen to undergo prophylactic mastectomy.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional, qualitative, descriptive design.
SETTING: Participants were recruited from an outpatient cancer prevention center in the oncology and medical genetics departments of a large university-affiliated hospital in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. SAMPLE: 10 women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation; 8 previously had had a prophylactic mastectomy and 2 were scheduled for surgery at the time of study.
METHODS: Semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted. Field notes were written and audiotapes were transcribed verbatim. The textual data were coded and analyzed. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Decision-making process for prophylactic mastectomy.
FINDINGS: Two broad findings emerged. First, several intrapersonal and contextual factors interacted throughout the process to move women either closer to choosing a prophylactic mastectomy or further from the decision. Second, all women reported experiencing a "pivotal point," an emotionally charged event when the decision to have a prophylactic mastectomy became definitive. Pivotal points for patients included either receiving a positive result for a genetic mutation or a breast cancer diagnosis for herself or a family member in the context of positive mutation status.
CONCLUSIONS: Decision making about prophylactic mastectomy was an affective and intuitive process incorporating contexts and their relations rather than a rational, straight-forward process of weighing pros and cons. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Supportive interventions for women in this population should explicitly address the individual and the inter-relationships of contextual factors that shape decision making about prophylactic mastectomy while recognizing important affective components involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20439215     DOI: 10.1188/10.ONF.313-320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  8 in total

1.  Perspectives of Women Considering Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and their Peers towards a Telephone-Based Peer Support Intervention.

Authors:  D St-Pierre; K Bouchard; L Gauthier; J Chiquette; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Searching for the noninvasive biomarker holy grail: are urine proteomics the answer?

Authors:  Joachim Voss; Young Ah Goo; Kevin Cain; Nancy Woods; Monica Jarrett; Lynne Smith; Robert Shulman; Margaret Heitkemper
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 2.522

3.  Psychosocial factors and uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women at high risk for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Melanie A Price; Phyllis N Butow; Janan Karatas; Judy Wilson; Louise Heiniger; Brandi Baylock; Margaret Charles; Sue-Anne McLachlan; Kelly-Anne Phillips
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  The knowledge value-chain of genetic counseling for breast cancer: an empirical assessment of prediction and communication processes.

Authors:  Nabil Amara; Jolyane Blouin-Bougie; Jalila Jbilou; Norrin Halilem; Jacques Simard; Réjean Landry
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Seeking balance: decision support needs of women without cancer and a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  Meghan L Underhill; Cheryl B Crotser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Decision making for breast cancer prevention among women at elevated risk.

Authors:  Tasleem J Padamsee; Celia E Wills; Lisa D Yee; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 7.  Shared Decision-Making in Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Xuejing Li; Meiqi Meng; Junqiang Zhao; Xiaoyan Zhang; Dan Yang; Jiaxin Fang; Junxin Wang; Liu Han; Yufang Hao
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 8.  Body Image in BRCA-Positive Young Women Following Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Christa Torrisi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.