BACKGROUND: Circulating cell-free DNA (ccf-DNA) is becoming an important biomarker for cancer diagnostics and therapy monitoring. The isolation of ccf-DNA from plasma as a "liquid biopsy" may begin to replace more invasive tissue biopsies for the detection and analysis of cancer-related mutations. Conventional methods for the isolation of ccf-DNA from plasma are costly, time-consuming, and complex, preventing the use of ccf-DNA biomarkers for point-of-care diagnostics and limiting other biomedical research applications. METHODS: We used an AC electrokinetic device to rapidly isolate ccf-DNA from 25 μL unprocessed blood. ccf-DNA from 15 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients and 3 healthy individuals was separated into dielectrophoretic (DEP) high-field regions, after which other blood components were removed by a fluidic wash. Concentrated ccf-DNA was detected by fluorescence and eluted for quantification, PCR, and DNA sequencing. The complete process, blood to PCR, required <10 min. ccf-DNA was amplified by PCR with immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV)-specific primers to identify the unique IGHV gene expressed by the leukemic B-cell clone, and then sequenced. RESULTS: PCR and DNA sequencing results obtained by DEP from 25 μL CLL blood matched results obtained by use of conventional methods for ccf-DNA isolation from 1 mL plasma and for genomic DNA isolation from CLL patient leukemic B cells isolated from 15-20 mL blood. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid isolation of ccf-DNA directly from a drop of blood will advance disease-related biomarker research, accelerate the transition from tissue to liquid biopsies, and enable point-of-care diagnostic systems for patient monitoring.
BACKGROUND: Circulating cell-free DNA (ccf-DNA) is becoming an important biomarker for cancer diagnostics and therapy monitoring. The isolation of ccf-DNA from plasma as a "liquid biopsy" may begin to replace more invasive tissue biopsies for the detection and analysis of cancer-related mutations. Conventional methods for the isolation of ccf-DNA from plasma are costly, time-consuming, and complex, preventing the use of ccf-DNA biomarkers for point-of-care diagnostics and limiting other biomedical research applications. METHODS: We used an AC electrokinetic device to rapidly isolate ccf-DNA from 25 μL unprocessed blood. ccf-DNA from 15 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients and 3 healthy individuals was separated into dielectrophoretic (DEP) high-field regions, after which other blood components were removed by a fluidic wash. Concentrated ccf-DNA was detected by fluorescence and eluted for quantification, PCR, and DNA sequencing. The complete process, blood to PCR, required <10 min. ccf-DNA was amplified by PCR with immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV)-specific primers to identify the unique IGHV gene expressed by the leukemic B-cell clone, and then sequenced. RESULTS: PCR and DNA sequencing results obtained by DEP from 25 μL CLL blood matched results obtained by use of conventional methods for ccf-DNA isolation from 1 mL plasma and for genomic DNA isolation from CLL patientleukemic B cells isolated from 15-20 mL blood. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid isolation of ccf-DNA directly from a drop of blood will advance disease-related biomarker research, accelerate the transition from tissue to liquid biopsies, and enable point-of-care diagnostic systems for patient monitoring.
Authors: Emanuela M Ghia; Sonia Jain; George F Widhopf; Laura Z Rassenti; Michael J Keating; William G Wierda; John G Gribben; Jennifer R Brown; Kanti R Rai; John C Byrd; Neil E Kay; Andrew W Greaves; Thomas J Kipps Journal: Blood Date: 2008-03-07 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Rajaram Krishnan; Dietrich A Dehlinger; Gregory J Gemmen; Robert L Mifflin; Sadik C Esener; Michael J Heller Journal: Electrochem commun Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.724
Authors: Oliver Gautschi; Colette Bigosch; Barbara Huegli; Monika Jermann; Arthur Marx; Eveline Chassé; Daniel Ratschiller; Walter Weder; Markus Joerger; Daniel C Betticher; Rolf A Stahel; Annemarie Ziegler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-10-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Frank Diehl; Kerstin Schmidt; Michael A Choti; Katharine Romans; Steven Goodman; Meng Li; Katherine Thornton; Nishant Agrawal; Lori Sokoll; Steve A Szabo; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Luis A Diaz Journal: Nat Med Date: 2007-07-31 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Avery Sonnenberg; Jennifer Y Marciniak; Elaine A Skowronski; Sareh Manouchehri; Laura Rassenti; Emanuela M Ghia; George F Widhopf; Thomas J Kipps; Michael J Heller Journal: Electrophoresis Date: 2014-05-14 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Sareh Manouchehri; Stuart Ibsen; Jennifer Wright; Laura Rassenti; Emanuela M Ghia; George F Widhopf; Thomas J Kipps; Michael J Heller Journal: Int J Hematol Oncol Date: 2016-05-05
Authors: Evan D Muse; Eric R Kramer; Haiying Wang; Paddy Barrett; Fereshteh Parviz; Mark A Novotny; Roger S Lasken; Timothy A Jatkoe; Glenn Oliveira; Hongfan Peng; Jerry Lu; Mark C Connelly; Kurt Schilling; Chandra Rao; Ali Torkamani; Eric J Topol Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-09-25 Impact factor: 4.379