Literature DB >> 24268417

Heart-specific stiffening in early embryos parallels matrix and myosin expression to optimize beating.

Stephanie Majkut1, Timon Idema, Joe Swift, Christine Krieger, Andrea Liu, Dennis E Discher.   

Abstract

In development and differentiation, morphological changes often accompany mechanical changes [1], but it is unclear whether or when cells in embryos sense tissue elasticity. The earliest embryo is uniformly pliable, while adult tissues vary widely in mechanics from soft brain and stiff heart to rigid bone [2]. However, cell sensitivity to microenvironment elasticity is debated based in part on results from complex three-dimensional culture models [3]. Regenerative cardiology provides strong motivation to clarify any cell-level sensitivities to tissue elasticity because rigid postinfarct regions limit pumping by the adult heart [4]. Here, we focus on the spontaneously beating embryonic heart and sparsely cultured cardiomyocytes, including cells derived from pluripotent stem cells. Tissue elasticity, Et, increases daily for heart to 1-2 kPa by embryonic day 4 (E4), and although this is ~10-fold softer than adult heart, the beating contractions of E4 cardiomyocytes prove optimal at ~Et,E4 both in vivo and in vitro. Proteomics reveals daily increases in a small subset of proteins, namely collagen plus cardiac-specific excitation-contraction proteins. Rapid softening of the heart's matrix with collagenase or stiffening it with enzymatic crosslinking suppresses beating. Sparsely cultured E4 cardiomyocytes on collagen-coated gels likewise show maximal contraction on matrices with native E4 stiffness, highlighting cell-intrinsic mechanosensitivity. While an optimal elasticity for striation proves consistent with the mathematics of force-driven sarcomere registration, contraction wave speed is linear in Et as theorized for excitation-contraction coupled to matrix elasticity. Pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes also prove to be mechanosensitive to matrix and thus generalize the main observation that myosin II organization and contractile function are optimally matched to the load contributed by matrix elasticity.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24268417      PMCID: PMC4116639          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  28 in total

1.  Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation.

Authors:  Joe Swift; Irena L Ivanovska; Amnon Buxboim; Takamasa Harada; P C Dave P Dingal; Joel Pinter; J David Pajerowski; Kyle R Spinler; Jae-Won Shin; Manorama Tewari; Florian Rehfeldt; David W Speicher; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures.

Authors:  Penelope C Georges; William J Miller; David F Meaney; Evelyn S Sawyer; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Cardiac myofibrillogenesis inside intact embryonic hearts.

Authors:  Aiping Du; Jean M Sanger; Joseph W Sanger
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating.

Authors:  Adam J Engler; Christine Carag-Krieger; Colin P Johnson; Matthew Raab; Hsin-Yao Tang; David W Speicher; Joseph W Sanger; Jean M Sanger; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Influence of substrate stiffness on the phenotype of heart cells.

Authors:  Bashir Bhana; Rohin K Iyer; Wen Li Kelly Chen; Ruogang Zhao; Krista L Sider; Morakot Likhitpanichkul; Craig A Simmons; Milica Radisic
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Cardiogenesis and the complex biology of regenerative cardiovascular medicine.

Authors:  Kenneth R Chien; Ibrahim J Domian; Kevin Kit Parker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Myofibrillogenesis in skeletal muscle cells in zebrafish.

Authors:  Joseph W Sanger; Jushuo Wang; Beth Holloway; Aiping Du; Jean M Sanger
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  2009-08

8.  Estimating Young's modulus of zona pellucida by micropipette aspiration in combination with theoretical models of ovum.

Authors:  Morteza Khalilian; Mahdi Navidbakhsh; Mojtaba Rezazadeh Valojerdi; Mahmoud Chizari; Poopak Eftekhari Yazdi
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Stretching single talin rod molecules activates vinculin binding.

Authors:  Armando del Rio; Raul Perez-Jimenez; Ruchuan Liu; Pere Roca-Cusachs; Julio M Fernandez; Michael P Sheetz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 63.714

10.  Effects of substrate mechanics on contractility of cardiomyocytes generated from human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Laurie B Hazeltine; Chelsey S Simmons; Max R Salick; Xiaojun Lian; Mehmet G Badur; Wenqing Han; Stephanie M Delgado; Tetsuro Wakatsuki; Wendy C Crone; Beth L Pruitt; Sean P Palecek
Journal:  Int J Cell Biol       Date:  2012-05-09
View more
  73 in total

1.  Matrix elasticity regulates the optimal cardiac myocyte shape for contractility.

Authors:  Megan L McCain; Hongyan Yuan; Francesco S Pasqualini; Patrick H Campbell; Kevin Kit Parker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 2.  Genetic control of morphogenesis in Dictyostelium.

Authors:  William F Loomis
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 3.  Basic Biology of Extracellular Matrix in the Cardiovascular System, Part 1/4: JACC Focus Seminar.

Authors:  Gonzalo Del Monte-Nieto; Jens W Fischer; Daniel J Gorski; Richard P Harvey; Jason C Kovacic
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  The (dys)functional extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; Nathan D Bade; Corinne N Riggin; Sijia Zhang; Philip G Haines; Katy L Ong; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-04-27

Review 5.  Stem cell mechanobiology: diverse lessons from bone marrow.

Authors:  Irena L Ivanovska; Jae-Won Shin; Joe Swift; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 20.808

6.  Mitochondrial function in engineered cardiac tissues is regulated by extracellular matrix elasticity and tissue alignment.

Authors:  Davi M Lyra-Leite; Allen M Andres; Andrew P Petersen; Nethika R Ariyasinghe; Nathan Cho; Jezell A Lee; Roberta A Gottlieb; Megan L McCain
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Systems mechanobiology: tension-inhibited protein turnover is sufficient to physically control gene circuits.

Authors:  P C Dave P Dingal; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Simple insoluble cues specify stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  P C Dave P Dingal; Rebecca G Wells; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  In Vivo Pressurization of the Zebrafish Embryonic Heart as a Tool to Characterize Tissue Properties During Development.

Authors:  Alex Gendernalik; Banafsheh Zebhi; Neha Ahuja; Deborah Garrity; David Bark
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  Fibrous scaffolds for building hearts and heart parts.

Authors:  A K Capulli; L A MacQueen; Sean P Sheehy; K K Parker
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.