BACKGROUND: Estimates of the sensitivity and specificity for new diagnostic tests based on evaluation against a known gold standard are imprecise when the accuracy of the gold standard is imperfect. Bayesian latent class models (LCMs) can be helpful under these circumstances, but the necessary analysis requires expertise in computational programming. Here, we describe open-access web-based applications that allow non-experts to apply Bayesian LCMs to their own data sets via a user-friendly interface. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Applications for Bayesian LCMs were constructed on a web server using R and WinBUGS programs. The models provided (http://mice.tropmedres.ac) include two Bayesian LCMs: the two-tests in two-population model (Hui and Walter model) and the three-tests in one-population model (Walter and Irwig model). Both models are available with simplified and advanced interfaces. In the former, all settings for Bayesian statistics are fixed as defaults. Users input their data set into a table provided on the webpage. Disease prevalence and accuracy of diagnostic tests are then estimated using the Bayesian LCM, and provided on the web page within a few minutes. With the advanced interfaces, experienced researchers can modify all settings in the models as needed. These settings include correlation among diagnostic test results and prior distributions for all unknown parameters. The web pages provide worked examples with both models using the original data sets presented by Hui and Walter in 1980, and by Walter and Irwig in 1988. We also illustrate the utility of the advanced interface using the Walter and Irwig model on a data set from a recent melioidosis study. The results obtained from the web-based applications were comparable to those published previously. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed web-based applications are open-access and provide an important new resource for researchers worldwide to evaluate new diagnostic tests.
BACKGROUND: Estimates of the sensitivity and specificity for new diagnostic tests based on evaluation against a known gold standard are imprecise when the accuracy of the gold standard is imperfect. Bayesian latent class models (LCMs) can be helpful under these circumstances, but the necessary analysis requires expertise in computational programming. Here, we describe open-access web-based applications that allow non-experts to apply Bayesian LCMs to their own data sets via a user-friendly interface. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Applications for Bayesian LCMs were constructed on a web server using R and WinBUGS programs. The models provided (http://mice.tropmedres.ac) include two Bayesian LCMs: the two-tests in two-population model (Hui and Walter model) and the three-tests in one-population model (Walter and Irwig model). Both models are available with simplified and advanced interfaces. In the former, all settings for Bayesian statistics are fixed as defaults. Users input their data set into a table provided on the webpage. Disease prevalence and accuracy of diagnostic tests are then estimated using the Bayesian LCM, and provided on the web page within a few minutes. With the advanced interfaces, experienced researchers can modify all settings in the models as needed. These settings include correlation among diagnostic test results and prior distributions for all unknown parameters. The web pages provide worked examples with both models using the original data sets presented by Hui and Walter in 1980, and by Walter and Irwig in 1988. We also illustrate the utility of the advanced interface using the Walter and Irwig model on a data set from a recent melioidosis study. The results obtained from the web-based applications were comparable to those published previously. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed web-based applications are open-access and provide an important new resource for researchers worldwide to evaluate new diagnostic tests.
Authors: Shaun M Comfort; Bruce Donzanti; Darren Dorrell; Sunita Dhar; Chris Eden; Francis Donaldson Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2022-10-23 Impact factor: 5.228
Authors: Cherry Lim; Daniel H Paris; Stuart D Blacksell; Achara Laongnualpanich; Pacharee Kantipong; Wirongrong Chierakul; Vanaporn Wuthiekanun; Nicholas P J Day; Ben S Cooper; Direk Limmathurotsakul Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alex R Hoffmaster; David AuCoin; Prasith Baccam; Henry C Baggett; Rob Baird; Saithip Bhengsri; David D Blaney; Paul J Brett; Timothy J G Brooks; Katherine A Brown; Narisara Chantratita; Allen C Cheng; David A B Dance; Saskia Decuypere; Dawn Defenbaugh; Jay E Gee; Raymond Houghton; Possawat Jorakate; Ganjana Lertmemongkolchai; Direk Limmathurotsakul; Toby L Merlin; Chiranjay Mukhopadhyay; Robert Norton; Sharon J Peacock; Dionne B Rolim; Andrew J Simpson; Ivo Steinmetz; Robyn A Stoddard; Martha M Stokes; David Sue; Apichai Tuanyok; Toni Whistler; Vanaporn Wuthiekanun; Henry T Walke Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: K Woods; C Nic-Fhogartaigh; C Arnold; L Boutthasavong; W Phuklia; C Lim; A Chanthongthip; S M Tulsiani; S B Craig; M-A Burns; S L Weier; V Davong; S Sihalath; D Limmathurotsakul; D A B Dance; N Shetty; M Zambon; P N Newton; S Dittrich Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: Stuart D Blacksell; Cherry Lim; Ampai Tanganuchitcharnchai; Suthatip Jintaworn; Pacharee Kantipong; Allen L Richards; Daniel H Paris; Direk Limmathurotsakul; Nicholas P J Day Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Lester J Pérez; Saraswathi Lanka; Vanessa J DeShambo; Richard L Fredrickson; Carol W Maddox Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 5.640