Literature DB >> 7370371

Estimating the error rates of diagnostic tests.

S L Hui, S D Walter.   

Abstract

It is often required to evaluate the accuracy of a new diagnostic test against a standard test with unknown error rates. If the two tests are applied simultaneously to the same individuals from two populations with different disease prevalences, then assuming conditional independence of the errors of the two tests, the error rates of both tests and the true prevalences in both populations can be estimated by a maximum likelihood procedure. Generalizations to several tests applied in several populations are also possible.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7370371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  134 in total

1.  The correction for bias in prevalence estimation with screening tests.

Authors:  B Gambino
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  1997

2.  Endoscopy versus radiography for the diagnosis of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Gilead Berger; David M Steinberg; Aron Popovtzer; Dov Ophir
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-09-18       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Comparison of diagnostic techniques for the detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in animal samples.

Authors:  Marzieh Ezzaty Mirhashemi; Annetta Zintl; Tim Grant; Frances E Lucy; Grace Mulcahy; Theo De Waal
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.011

4.  The meaning of the opposition between the healthy and the pathological and its consequences.

Authors:  Maël Lemoine
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2008-07-30

5.  Measurement of Current Substance Use in a Cohort of HIV-Infected Persons in Continuity HIV Care, 2007-2015.

Authors:  Catherine R Lesko; Alexander P Keil; Richard D Moore; Geetanjali Chander; Anthony T Fojo; Bryan Lau
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Malaria surveillance in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: comparison of microscopy, PCR, and rapid diagnostic test.

Authors:  Stephanie M Doctor; Yunhao Liu; Amy Whitesell; Kyaw L Thwai; Steve M Taylor; Mark Janko; Michael Emch; Melchior Kashamuka; Jérémie Muwonga; Antoinette Tshefu; Steven R Meshnick
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 2.803

7.  Bayesian estimation of hepatitis E virus seroprevalence for populations with different exposure levels to swine in The Netherlands.

Authors:  M Bouwknegt; B Engel; M M P T Herremans; M A Widdowson; H C Worm; M P G Koopmans; K Frankena; A M de Roda Husman; M C M De Jong; W H M Van Der Poel
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 2.451

8.  Misclassification can explain most apparent regression of age-related macular degeneration: results from multistate models with misclassification.

Authors:  Ronald E Gangnon; Kristine E Lee; Barbara E K Klein; Sudha K Iyengar; Theru A Sivakumaran; Ronald Klein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Serological survey for foot-and-mouth disease virus in wildlife in eastern Africa and estimation of test parameters of a nonstructural protein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for buffalo.

Authors:  B M D C Bronsvoort; S Parida; I Handel; S McFarland; L Fleming; P Hamblin; R Kock
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2008-04-02

10.  A crossed random effects modeling approach for estimating diagnostic accuracy from ordinal ratings without a gold standard.

Authors:  Yunlong Xie; Zhen Chen; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.