Literature DB >> 24265374

Artificial sweeteners have no effect on gastric emptying, glucagon-like peptide-1, or glycemia after oral glucose in healthy humans.

Tongzhi Wu1, Michelle J Bound, Scott D Standfield, Max Bellon, Richard L Young, Karen L Jones, Michael Horowitz, Christopher K Rayner.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24265374      PMCID: PMC3836145          DOI: 10.2337/dc13-0958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


× No keyword cloud information.
Intestinal exposure to glucose stimulates the release of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), slows subsequent gastric emptying, and reduces appetite. These responses are signaled, at least in part, by intestinal “sweet taste receptors” (STRs), including taste receptor type 1 members 2 and 3 (T1R2, T1R3), and their cellular signaling partners α-gustducin and transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 5 (TRPM5) (1). A recent study by Brown et al. (2) in healthy humans reported that oral ingestion of “diet soda,” containing both sucralose (46 mg) and acesulfame potassium (AceK) (26 mg), augmented GLP-1 release by more than one-third after an oral glucose load given 10 min later compared with carbonated water, suggesting a potential synergy between artificial sweeteners and glucose in stimulating GLP-1 secretion. The design of that study was, however, suboptimal, as the diet soda contained a number of substances (including caramel color, gum acacia, natural flavors, citric acid, potassium benzoate, phosphoric acid, and potassium citrate) that were not controlled for. Therefore, we evaluated whether oral administration of sucralose and AceK in doses comparable with those used by Brown et al. (2) would augment the GLP-1 response to oral glucose and modulate gastric emptying or glycemia in healthy humans. Ten healthy males (mean age 33.6 ± 5.9 years; BMI: 25.5 ± 1.0 kg/m2) were studied on four occasions each, separated by ≥3 days, in single-blinded randomized fashion. Informed consent and ethics approval were obtained. After an overnight fast, each subject consumed either 240 mL water alone or equivalently sweetened with 1) 52 mg sucralose, 2) 200 mg AceK, or 3) 46 mg sucralose plus 26 mg AceK (3). Ten minutes later, each drank 75 g of glucose, made up to 300 mL with water, and containing 150 mg 13C-acetate. Blood glucose (glucometer), plasma insulin (ELISA), total GLP-1 (radioimmunoassay), and gastric emptying (breath test) were evaluated over 240 min. Blood glucose, plasma insulin, and total GLP-1 concentrations did not change after either water or sweetened drinks, prior to glucose ingestion, but all increased after oral glucose (P < 0.001 for each), without any difference between the 4 days (Fig. 1). Neither the 13CO2:12CO2 ratio nor the half-emptying time (T50) differed between the 4 days (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Effects of ingestion of either water or artificial sweeteners (sucralose, AceK, or sucralose plus AceK) (at t = −10 min) on (A) blood glucose, (B) plasma insulin, (C) GLP-1, (D) 13CO2-to-12CO2 ratio, and (E) T50 in response to 75-g oral glucose (at t = 0 min) in healthy humans (n = 10). Data are means ± SEM. The area under the curves for blood glucose, plasma insulin, 13CO2-to-12CO2 ratio, and T50 did not differ between the 4 study days before and after 75-g oral glucose (one-factor repeated-measures ANOVA). There was a time effect (P < 0.001) but not a treatment effect or treatment × time interaction for blood glucose, plasma insulin, and 13CO2-to-12CO2 ratio (two-factor repeated-measures ANOVA with treatment and time as factors).

Effects of ingestion of either water or artificial sweeteners (sucralose, AceK, or sucralose plus AceK) (at t = −10 min) on (A) blood glucose, (B) plasma insulin, (C) GLP-1, (D) 13CO2-to-12CO2 ratio, and (E) T50 in response to 75-g oral glucose (at t = 0 min) in healthy humans (n = 10). Data are means ± SEM. The area under the curves for blood glucose, plasma insulin, 13CO2-to-12CO2 ratio, and T50 did not differ between the 4 study days before and after 75-g oral glucose (one-factor repeated-measures ANOVA). There was a time effect (P < 0.001) but not a treatment effect or treatment × time interaction for blood glucose, plasma insulin, and 13CO2-to-12CO2 ratio (two-factor repeated-measures ANOVA with treatment and time as factors). These observations differ from those of Brown et al. (2), although the doses of sucralose and AceK and the load and timing of the subsequent glucose drink were identical in our study. It is unclear whether other components of diet soda that were not controlled for by Brown et al. may have had the capacity to stimulate GLP-1 secretion. Our findings are, however, consistent with previous reports that sucralose or AceK alone has no effect on GLP-1 secretion, insulin, or blood glucose concentrations (3,4) and our observations that sucralose had no effect on GLP-1 secretion or the glycemic response to intraduodenal glucose in healthy humans (5). That the STR antagonist, lactisole, attenuates glucose-stimulated GLP-1 secretion suggests that activation of STRs is necessary, but not sufficient, to stimulate L-cell secretion (1). In conclusion, sucralose and AceK, either alone or in combination, have no acute effect on gastric emptying, GLP-1, or glycemic responses after oral glucose in healthy humans.
  5 in total

1.  Effect of the artificial sweetener, sucralose, on small intestinal glucose absorption in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  Jing Ma; Jessica Chang; Helen L Checklin; Richard L Young; Karen L Jones; Michael Horowitz; Christopher K Rayner
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.718

2.  Effects of carbohydrate sugars and artificial sweeteners on appetite and the secretion of gastrointestinal satiety peptides.

Authors:  Robert E Steinert; Florian Frey; Antonia Töpfer; Jürgen Drewe; Christoph Beglinger
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.718

3.  The functional involvement of gut-expressed sweet taste receptors in glucose-stimulated secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY (PYY).

Authors:  R E Steinert; A C Gerspach; H Gutmann; L Asarian; J Drewe; C Beglinger
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 7.324

4.  Effect of the artificial sweetener, sucralose, on gastric emptying and incretin hormone release in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Jing Ma; Max Bellon; Judith M Wishart; Richard Young; L Ashley Blackshaw; Karen L Jones; Michael Horowitz; Christopher K Rayner
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 4.052

5.  Ingestion of diet soda before a glucose load augments glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion.

Authors:  Rebecca J Brown; Mary Walter; Kristina I Rother
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 19.112

  5 in total
  17 in total

Review 1.  Non-nutritive Sweeteners and Glycaemic Control.

Authors:  Yoona Kim; Jennifer B Keogh; Peter M Clifton
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  An alternative pathway for sweet sensation: possible mechanisms and physiological relevance.

Authors:  Elena von Molitor; Katja Riedel; Michael Krohn; Rüdiger Rudolf; Mathias Hafner; Tiziana Cesetti
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.657

3.  Sucralose enhances GLP-1 release and lowers blood glucose in the presence of carbohydrate in healthy subjects but not in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S Temizkan; O Deyneli; M Yasar; M Arpa; M Gunes; D Yazici; O Sirikci; G Haklar; N Imeryuz; D G Yavuz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 4.  Metabolic effects of non-nutritive sweeteners.

Authors:  M Yanina Pepino
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-06-19

5.  Mosapride citrate increases postprandial glucagon-like peptide-1, insulin, and gene expression of sweet taste receptors.

Authors:  Daisuke Maruoka; Makoto Arai; Takeshi Tanaka; Kenichiro Okimoto; Arata Oyamada; Shoko Minemura; Masaru Tsuboi; Tomoaki Matsumura; Tomoo Nakagawa; Tatsuo Kanda; Tatsuro Katsuno; Fumio Imazeki; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  The cephalic phase insulin response to nutritive and low-calorie sweeteners in solid and beverage form.

Authors:  Jaapna Dhillon; Janice Y Lee; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-09-09

7.  Comment on Pepino et al. Sucralose affects glycemic and hormonal responses to an oral glucose load. Diabetes care 2013;36:2530-2535.

Authors:  V Lee Grotz; Jeremy D Jokinen
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Chronic Consumption of Sweeteners and Its Effect on Glycaemia, Cytokines, Hormones, and Lymphocytes of GALT in CD1 Mice.

Authors:  Cristian Angel Rosales-Gómez; Beatriz Elina Martínez-Carrillo; Aldo Arturo Reséndiz-Albor; Ninfa Ramírez-Durán; Roxana Valdés-Ramos; Talia Mondragón-Velásquez; Jorge Alberto Escoto-Herrera
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Serotonin-secreting enteroendocrine cells respond via diverse mechanisms to acute and chronic changes in glucose availability.

Authors:  Leah Zelkas; Ravi Raghupathi; Amanda L Lumsden; Alyce M Martin; Emily Sun; Nick J Spencer; Richard L Young; Damien J Keating
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.169

10.  Failure of sucrose replacement with the non-nutritive sweetener erythritol to alter GLP-1 or PYY release or test meal size in lean or obese people.

Authors:  Joost Overduin; Tinh-Hai Collet; Nenad Medic; Elana Henning; Julia M Keogh; Faye Forsyth; Cheryl Stephenson; Marja W Kanning; Rianne M A J Ruijschop; I Sadaf Farooqi; Agatha A van der Klaauw
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.