Literature DB >> 24265213

The perception of telephone-processed speech by combined electric and acoustic stimulation.

Yi Hu1, Qudsia Tahmina, Christina Runge, David R Friedland.   

Abstract

This study assesses the effects of adding low- or high-frequency information to the band-limited telephone-processed speech on bimodal listeners' telephone speech perception in quiet environments. In the proposed experiments, bimodal users were presented under quiet listening conditions with wideband speech (WB), bandpass-filtered telephone speech (300-3,400 Hz, BP), high-pass filtered speech (f > 300 Hz, HP, i.e., distorted frequency components above 3,400 Hz in telephone speech were restored), and low-pass filtered speech (f < 3,400 Hz, LP, i.e., distorted frequency components below 300 Hz in telephone speech were restored). Results indicated that in quiet environments, for all four types of stimuli, listening with both hearing aid (HA) and cochlear implant (CI) was significantly better than listening with CI alone. For both bimodal and CI-alone modes, there were no statistically significant differences between the LP and BP scores and between the WB and HP scores. However, the HP scores were significantly better than the BP scores. In quiet conditions, both CI alone and bimodal listening achieved the largest benefits when telephone speech was augmented with high rather than low-frequency information. These findings provide support for the design of algorithms that would extend higher frequency information, at least in quiet environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bandwidth effect; bimodal hearing; cochlear implant; electroacoustic stimulation; telephone speech

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24265213      PMCID: PMC4070615          DOI: 10.1177/1084713813512901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  24 in total

1.  Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner; Bruce J Gantz; Corina Vidal; Amy Behrens; Belinda A Henry
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  An investigation into the effect of limiting the frequency bandwidth of speech on speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Abigail J Milchard; Helen E Cullington
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  A simulation study of harmonics regeneration in noise reduction for electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Yi Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of minimum stimulation settings for the Med El Tempo+ speech processor on speech understanding.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Unintelligible low-frequency sound enhances simulated cochlear-implant speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Janice E Chang; John Y Bai; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Acoustic plus electric speech processing: preliminary results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid implant.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Christopher Turner; Kate E Gfeller
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.017

9.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

10.  Frequency overlap between electric and acoustic stimulation and speech-perception benefit in patients with combined electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of wireless Bluetooth devices to improve recognition of speech and sentences when using a mobile phone in bone conduction device recipients.

Authors:  Tae Hoon Kong; Chanbeom Kwak; Woojae Han; Young Joon Seo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.503

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.