Literature DB >> 15457818

An investigation into the effect of limiting the frequency bandwidth of speech on speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users.

Abigail J Milchard1, Helen E Cullington.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the limited-frequency bandwidth employed by telephones (300-3400Hz) on speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users. The Four Alternative Auditory Feature (FAAF) test was used in four conditions: unfiltered and in three filtered conditions of 300-4500Hz, 300-3400Hz and 300-2500Hz. Ten subjects implanted with the Nucleus C124M device and 10 normal-hearing listeners were assessed to examine differences between word discrimination scores in each condition. Scores obtained from the 300-3400-Hz and 300-2500-Hz filtered conditions were significantly worse than those with unfiltered speech for the cochlear implant subjects, decreasing by 17.7% and 21.4%, respectively, from scores with unfiltered speech. By contrast, the normal-hearing listeners did not experience difficulties in discriminating between words in any of the conditions. Analysis of the word errors demonstrated that the reduction in implant subject scores with bandwidth arose from errors in place of articulation. Filtering speech in this way has a significant effect on speech recognition for cochlear implant subjects but not normal-hearing listeners. Hence, the limitations of the normal telephone bandwidth can be expected to have a negative effect on speech recognition for cochlear implant users using the telephone.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15457818     DOI: 10.1080/14992020400050045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  10 in total

1.  Effects of introducing low-frequency harmonics in the perception of vocoded telephone speech.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effect of bandwidth extension to telephone speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Chuping Liu; Qian-Jie Fu; Shrikanth S Narayanan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The perception of telephone-processed speech by combined electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Qudsia Tahmina; Christina Runge; David R Friedland
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-11-20

5.  Evaluation of wireless Bluetooth devices to improve recognition of speech and sentences when using a mobile phone in bone conduction device recipients.

Authors:  Tae Hoon Kong; Chanbeom Kwak; Woojae Han; Young Joon Seo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Recording and evaluation of an American dialect version of the Four Alternative Auditory Feature test.

Authors:  Jingjing Xu; Robyn M Cox
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  User evaluation of a communication system that automatically generates captions to improve telephone communication.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; Judith M Kessens; Marcel S M G Vlaming; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-01-05

8.  Speech perception benefits of internet versus conventional telephony for hearing-impaired individuals.

Authors:  Georgios Mantokoudis; Patrick Dubach; Flurin Pfiffner; Martin Kompis; Marco Caversaccio; Pascal Senn
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  The effect of internet telephony and a cochlear implant accessory on mobile phone speech comprehension in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Markus E Huth; Regula L Boschung; Marco D Caversaccio; Wilhelm Wimmer; Mantokoudis Georgios
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 3.236

10.  Influence of Telecommunication Modality, Internet Transmission Quality, and Accessories on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Georgios Mantokoudis; Roger Koller; Jérémie Guignard; Marco Caversaccio; Martin Kompis; Pascal Senn
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.