| Literature DB >> 24259869 |
Ji Kyeng Jeon1, Hee Sung Lim, Sung Rae Shin, Bo Hyun Kim, Suk Min Lee.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study investigated the muscle activity differences of three different lumbar stabilization exercises in a comparison of middle-aged and young women. [Subjects] Seventeen middle-aged women and fifteen young women were enrolled in this study. Patients with a history of any neurologic disorders, orthopedic disorders, or cardiopulmonary problems that would have affected their lumbar stabilization exercise performance were excluded. [Methods] All subjects performed 3 exercises while the surface electromographic activity was recorded of the rectus abdominis, internal oblique, multifidus, and iliocostalis lumbolum. The mean electromyographic amplitudes obtained during the exercise were normalized to the amplitude of maximal voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC) to produce an inter-individually comparable muscle activity index.Entities:
Keywords: Bridging exercise; Middle-aged women; Muscle activity
Year: 2013 PMID: 24259869 PMCID: PMC3820385 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.25.853
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
General characteristics of subjects
| Characteristics | Young women (n=15) | Middle aged women (n=17) |
| Age (yrs) | 25.6±2.9 | 51.3±3.6 |
| Height (cm) | 159.4±3.7 | 159.4±5.3 |
| Weight (kg) | 55.6±5.5 | 59.1±6.1 |
| BMI | 19.6±4.3 | 22.2±4.5 |
amean±SD
Muscle activities in the three different bridging exercises
| Characteristics | Young women (n=15) | Middle aged women (n=17) | |||||||
| RA | IO | MF | IL | RA | IO | MF | IL | ||
| General bridging | 12.8±3.4 | 15.3±5.8 | 22.9±9.9 | 27.7±7.4 | 13.5±6.3 | 18.0±7.7 | 34.4±6.3* | 30.3±6.9* | |
| Ring bridging | 15.8±4.3 | 25.1±6.2 | 30.3±10.6 | 26.1±9.8 | 20.0±10.0 | 27.1±6.4 | 43.1±5.8* | 36.0±7.8* | |
| Foam roller bridging | 14.0±4.20 | 19.7±5.0 | 22.1±7.1 | 20.3±7.5 | 15.8±7.2 | 23.4±9.4 | 35.1±4.6* | 32.8±6.1* | |
| Mean ± SD; *, Significantly different from the young women (p<0.05) | |||||||||
| Post hoc test results of the comparison of the bridging postures | |||||||||
| Characteristics | RA (p) | IO (p) | MF (p) | IL (p) | |||||
| Young | BI:II | −3.06* | −9.83* | −7.42* | −4.42 | ||||
| BII:III | 1.87* | 5.44* | 8.14* | 5.88* | |||||
| BI:III | −1.19 | −4.39* | 0.72 | 1.46 | |||||
| Middle aged | BI:II | −6.81* | −9.09* | −8.52* | −5.92* | ||||
| BII:III | 4.37* | 3.74* | 8.042* | 3.42* | |||||
| BI:III | −2.45 | −5.35* | −0.48 | −2.50* | |||||
Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Bonferroni. Mean ± SD; *, p<0.05 compared among the bridging postures. RA, rectus abdominus; IO, internus obliquus; MF, multifidus; IL, iliocostas lumborum. BI, general bridging; BII, ring bridging; BIII, foam roller bridging
Muscle activity ratios of the local and global muscle in three different bridging exercises
| Characteristics | Young women (n=15) | Middle aged women (n=17) | |||
| IO/RA | MF/IL | IO/RA | MF/IL | ||
| General bridging | 1.40±1.04 | 1.03±1.07 | 1.48±0.57 | 1.23±0.46 | |
| Ring bridging | 1.80±1.08 | 1.42±0.95 | 1.69±1.06 | 1.26±0.39 | |
| Foam roller bridging | 1.68±1.09 | 1.40±1.08 | 1.68±0.84 | 1.10±0.32 | |
| Mean ± SD; *, Significantly different from the young women (p<0.05) | |||||
| Post hoc test results of the comparison of the bridging postures | |||||
| Characteristics | IO/RA (p) | MF/IL (p) | |||
| Young | BI:II | −0.42* | −0.09 | ||
| BII:III | 0.15 | 0.00 | |||
| BI:III | −0.27* | −0.09 | |||
| Middle aged | BI:II | −0.25 | −0.03 | ||
| BII:III | 0.00 | 0.15 | |||
| BI:III | −0.25 | 0.12 | |||
Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Bonferroni. Mean ± SD; *, p<0.05 between the bridging postures. Abbreviations are the same as those used in Table 2.