Literature DB >> 11494189

Back and abdominal muscle function during stabilization exercises.

J P Arokoski1, T Valta, O Airaksinen, M Kankaanpää.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the paraspinal and abdominal muscle activities during different therapeutic exercises and to study how load increment produced by varying limb movements and trunk positions could affect these muscle activities.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study comparing muscle activities between men and women.
SETTING: Rehabilitation clinic in university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers (14 women, 10 men) aged 21 to 39 years.
INTERVENTIONS: Subjects performed 16 different therapeutic exercises commonly used to treat low back pain. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surface electromyography was recorded from the paraspinal (T9, L5) and abdominal (rectus abdominis, obliquus externus) muscles during these exercises. Average electromyographic amplitudes obtained during the exercises were normalized to the amplitude in maximal voluntary contraction (% MVC) to produce interindividually comparable muscle activity assessments.
RESULTS: Mean average normalized electromyographic amplitudes (% MVC) of the exercises were below 50% MVC. At L5 level, the multifidus muscle activities were significantly higher (p <.05) in women than in men, whereas no significant difference was found at T9 level. Similarly, rectus abdominis and obliquus externus activities were significantly higher (p <.001, p <.05) in women than in men. Load increment in hands or unbalanced trunk and limb movements produced higher paraspinal and abdominal muscle activities (p <.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Simple therapeutic exercises are effective in activating both abdominal and paraspinal muscles. By changing limb and trunk positions or unbalancing trunk movements, it is possible to increase trunk muscle activities. Women were better able to activate their stabilizing trunk muscles than men; but it is also possible that men, having a much higher degree of strength on maximal contraction, only need to activate a smaller amount of that maximum to perform a similar activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11494189     DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.23819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  43 in total

1.  Surface Electromyographic Activity of the Abdominal Muscles During Pelvic-Tilt and Abdominal-Hollowing Exercises.

Authors:  Cheri L. Drysdale; Jennifer E. Earl; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Electromyographic analysis of trunk-muscle activity during stable, unstable and unilateral bridging exercises in healthy individuals.

Authors:  F M Feldwieser; L Sheeran; A Meana-Esteban; V Sparkes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The impact of instability resistance training on balance and stability.

Authors:  Kenneth Anderson; David G Behm
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Electromyographic activity of trunk and hip muscles during stabilization exercises in four-point kneeling in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Veerle K Stevens; Andry Vleeming; Katie G Bouche; Nele N Mahieu; Guy G Vanderstraeten; Lieven A Danneels
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Role of lateral muscles and body orientation in feedforward postural control.

Authors:  Marcio J Santos; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  The importance of sensory-motor control in providing core stability: implications for measurement and training.

Authors:  Jan Borghuis; At L Hof; Koen A P M Lemmink
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Pilates: how does it work and who needs it?

Authors:  June Kloubec
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2011-12-29

8.  Muscle activity of the core during bilateral, unilateral, seated and standing resistance exercise.

Authors:  Atle Hole Saeterbakken; Marius Steiro Fimland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Core Stability in Athletes: A Critical Analysis of Current Guidelines.

Authors:  Klaus Wirth; Hagen Hartmann; Christoph Mickel; Elena Szilvas; Michael Keiner; Andre Sander
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  CORE MUSCLE ACTIVITY DURING THE CLEAN AND JERK LIFT WITH BARBELL VERSUS SANDBAGS AND WATER BAGS.

Authors:  Joaquin Calatayud; Juan C Colado; Fernando Martin; José Casaña; Markus D Jakobsen; Lars L Andersen
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.