Literature DB >> 1925756

The intersegmental and multisegmental muscles of the lumbar spine. A biomechanical model comparing lateral stabilizing potential.

J J Crisco1, M M Panjabi.   

Abstract

The intersegmental and multisegmental musculature of the lumbar spine was studied in a biomechanical model to compare their lateral stabilizing potential. By approximating the active and passive behavior of the stretch reflex as a variable stiffness spring whose stiffness was proportional to activation, the critical muscle stiffness required for mechanical stability was calculated. The model demonstrated that the intersegmental muscles were the least efficient at laterally stabilizing the spine. At any given load, multisegmental muscles were more efficient, and their efficiency increased with the number of segments spanned. The most efficient muscles were those that originated from the pelvis, spanning the maximum number of segments. The muscular model was unstable, regardless of the muscular stiffness, when any vertebral segment was devoid of muscle. Moreover, when the load on the spine is increased, buckling can be prevented most efficiently with the pelvic muscles and least efficiently with the intersegmental muscles.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1925756     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199107000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  33 in total

1.  Spinal muscle forces, internal loads and stability in standing under various postures and loads--application of kinematics-based algorithm.

Authors:  A Shirazi-Adl; M El-Rich; D G Pop; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Vertebral position alters paraspinal muscle spindle responsiveness in the feline spine: effect of positioning duration.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Role of intra-abdominal pressure in the unloading and stabilization of the human spine during static lifting tasks.

Authors:  N Arjmand; A Shirazi-Adl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The effects of trunk stiffness on postural control during unstable seated balance.

Authors:  N Peter Reeves; Vanessa Q Everding; Jacek Cholewicki; David C Morrisette
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Spine stability: the six blind men and the elephant.

Authors:  N Peter Reeves; Kumpati S Narendra; Jacek Cholewicki
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 6.  The importance of sensory-motor control in providing core stability: implications for measurement and training.

Authors:  Jan Borghuis; At L Hof; Koen A P M Lemmink
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Co-contraction of cervical muscles during sagittal and coronal neck motions at different movement speeds.

Authors:  Chih-Hsiu Cheng; Kwan-Hwa Lin; Jaw-Lin Wang
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Variations of CT-based trunk muscle attenuation by age, sex, and specific muscle.

Authors:  Dennis E Anderson; John M D'Agostino; Alexander G Bruno; Serkalem Demissie; Douglas P Kiel; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  How is precision regulated in maintaining trunk posture?

Authors:  Nienke W Willigenburg; Idsart Kingma; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Axial back pain in the athlete: pathophysiology and approach to rehabilitation.

Authors:  Chad Carlson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2009-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.