Literature DB >> 24258530

Preferred directions of arm movements are independent of visual perception of spatial directions.

Natalia Dounskaia1, Wanyue Wang, Robert L Sainburg, Andrzej Przybyla.   

Abstract

Directional preferences have previously been demonstrated during horizontal arm movements. These preferences were characterized by a tendency to exploit interaction torques for movement production at the shoulder or elbow, indicating that the preferred directions depend on biomechanical, and not on visual perception-based factors. We directly tested this hypothesis by systematically dissociating visual information from arm biomechanics. Sixteen subjects performed a free-stroke drawing task that required performance of fast strokes from the circle center toward the perimeter, while selecting stroke directions in a random order. Hand position was represented by a cursor displayed in the movement plane. The free-stroke drawing was performed twice, before and after visuomotor adaptation to a 30° clockwise rotation of the perceived hand path. The adaptation was achieved during practicing pointing movements to eight center-out targets. Directional preferences during performance of the free-stroke drawing task were revealed in ten out of the sixteen subjects. The orientation and strength of these preferences were largely the same in both conditions, showing no significant effect of the visuomotor adaptation. In both conditions, the major preferred directions were characterized by higher contribution of interaction torque to net torque at the shoulder as well as by relatively low inertial resistance and the sum of squared shoulder and elbow muscle torques. These results support the hypothesis that directional preferences are largely determined by biomechanical factors. However, this biomechanical effect can decrease or even disappear in some subjects when movements are performed in special conditions, such as the virtual environment used here.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24258530     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3766-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Commonalities and differences in control of various drawing movements.

Authors:  N Dounskaia; C J Ketcham; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-07-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps.

Authors:  H A Cunningham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  General coordination of shoulder, elbow and wrist dynamics during multijoint arm movements.

Authors:  James C Galloway; Gail F Koshland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements.

Authors:  Z M Pine; J W Krakauer; J Gordon; C Ghez
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-10-02       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  The role of intrinsic factors in control of arm movement direction: implications from directional preferences.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia; Jacob A Goble; Wanyue Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; M F Ghilardi; H Poizner; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Directional biases reveal utilization of arm's biomechanical properties for optimization of motor behavior.

Authors:  Jacob A Goble; Yanxin Zhang; Yury Shimansky; Siddharth Sharma; Natalia V Dounskaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Time-varying mechanical behavior of multijointed arm in man.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; M Carrozzo; N A Borghese
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Load emphasizes muscle effort minimization during selection of arm movement direction.

Authors:  Wanyue Wang; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  3 in total

1.  Eye-hand coordination during visuomotor adaptation: effects of hemispace and joint coordination.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Sebastian Rentsch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multifunctional Setup for Studying Human Motor Control Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Electromyography, Motion Capture, and Virtual Reality.

Authors:  William J Talkington; Bradley S Pollard; Erienne V Olesh; Valeriya Gritsenko
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Influence of workspace constraints on directional preferences of 3D arm movements.

Authors:  Wanyue Wang; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.