| Literature DB >> 24255867 |
Subramaniam Gopalakrishnan1, Vadlamudi Srinivas, Meesala Sree Vidya, Abhishek Rathore.
Abstract
Five strains of Streptomyces (CAI-24, CAI-121, CAI-127, KAI-32 and KAI-90) were earlier reported by us as biological control agents against Fusarium wilt of chickpea caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri (FOC). In the present study, the Streptomyces were characterized for enzymatic activities, physiological traits and further evaluated in greenhouse and field for their plant growth promotion (PGP) of sorghum and rice. All the Streptomyces produced lipase, β-1-3-glucanase and chitinase (except CAI-121 and CAI-127), grew in NaCl concentrations of up to 6%, at pH values between 5 and 13 and temperatures between 20 and 40°C and were highly sensitive to Thiram, Benlate, Captan, Benomyl and Radonil at field application level. When the Streptomyces were evaluated in the greenhouse on sorghum all the isolates significantly enhanced all the agronomic traits over the control. In the field, on rice, the Streptomyces significantly enhanced stover yield (up to 25%; except CAI-24), grain yield (up to 10%), total dry matter (up to 18%; except CAI-24) and root length, volume and dry weight (up to 15%, 36% and 55%, respectively, except CAI-24) over the control. In the rhizosphere soil, the Streptomyces significantly enhanced microbial biomass carbon (except CAI-24), nitrogen, dehydrogenase (except CAI-24), total N, available P and organic carbon (up to 41%, 52%, 75%, 122%, 53% and 13%, respectively) over the control. This study demonstrates that the selected Streptomyces which were antagonistic to FOC also have PGP properties.Entities:
Keywords: Antagonistic Streptomyces; Field evaluation; Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri; Plant growth promotion; Rice; Sorghum
Year: 2013 PMID: 24255867 PMCID: PMC3825066 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-574
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Figure 1Evaluation of the five strains antagonistic to FOC for their enzymatic activities.
Figure 2Evaluation of the five strains antagonistic to FOC for their tolerance of salinity, pH, temperature and fungicides (at field level application).
Evaluation of the five strains antagonistic to FOC for their plant growth promotion potential in sorghum under greenhouse conditions
| Treatment | Plant height (cm) | Leaf area (cm2) | Stem weight (g) | Leaf weight (g) | Root length (m plant-1) | Surface area (cm2plant-1) | Root volume (cm3plant-1) | Root dry weight (g plant-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAI-24 | 114 | 560 | 5.42 | 2.28 | 90 | 1003 | 10.2 | 0.92 |
| CAI-121 | 122 | 580 | 5.55 | 2.32 | 80 | 905 | 9.0 | 0.84 |
| CAI-127 | 100 | 624 | 5.09 | 2.35 | 88 | 922 | 9.3 | 0.87 |
| KAI-32 | 124 | 507 | 6.39 | 2.21 | 82 | 991 | 10.5 | 0.89 |
| KAI-90 | 130 | 589 | 7.03 | 2.41 | 78 | 973 | 10.5 | 1.01 |
| Control | 86 | 504 | 5.06 | 2.16 | 76 | 903 | 8.8 | 0.81 |
| Mean | 113 | 561 | 5.76 | 2.29 | 82 | 949 | 9.7 | 0.89 |
| SE± | 4.9*** | 27.5* | 0.471* | 0.048* | 3.4* | 13.9*** | 0.42* | 0.036* |
| LSD (5%) | 14.9 | 83.0 | 1.421 | 0.146 | 10.0 | 42.0 | 1.28 | 0.109 |
| CV% | 9 | 10 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 9 | 8 |
SE = standard error; LSD = least significant difference; CV = coefficient of variance; * = statistically significant at p = 0.05; *** = statistically significant at p = 0.001.
Effect of FOC antagonistic on the morphology and yield potential of rice cultivation
| Treatment | Plant height (cm) | Tillers number (m-2) | Primary panicles number | Secondary panicles number | Panicle length (cm) | Stover yield (g m-2) | Grain yield (g m-2) | Total dry matter (g m-2) | Test seed weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAI-24 | 85 | 586 | 11.9 | 29.8 | 24.8 | 584 | 587 | 1170 | 18.9 |
| CAI-121 | 81 | 506 | 11.8 | 26.5 | 24.5 | 637 | 583 | 1221 | 18.9 |
| CAI-127 | 80 | 501 | 12.1 | 31.0 | 24.6 | 754 | 619 | 1373 | 18.6 |
| KAI-32 | 82 | 532 | 12.2 | 28.3 | 25.0 | 754 | 640 | 1394 | 19.3 |
| KAI-90 | 81 | 589 | 11.7 | 27.8 | 24.5 | 693 | 587 | 1279 | 18.9 |
| Control | 80 | 459 | 11.4 | 25.0 | 24.4 | 601 | 582 | 1183 | 18.6 |
| Mean | 81 | 529 | 11.8 | 28.0 | 24.6 | 671 | 600 | 1270 | 18.9 |
| SE ± | 0.68*** | 15.6*** | 0.06** | 0.29*** | 0.09* | 27.8** | 9.7** | 31.9*** | 0.03*** |
| LSD (5%) | 2.0 | 47.1 | 0.22 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 87.7 | 30.5 | 100.4 | 0.11 |
| CV% | 2 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
SE = standard error; LSD = least significant difference; CV = coefficient of variance; * = statistically significant at p = 0.05; ** = statistically significant at p = 0.01; *** = statistically significant at p = 0.001.
Effect of FOC antagonistic on the root development of rice at harvesting stage of rice cultivation
| Treatment | Root length (m m-2) | Root volume (cm-3m-2) | Root dry weight (g m-2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 − 15 cm | 15 − 30 cm | Mean | 0 − 15 cm | 15 − 30 cm | Mean | 0 − 15 cm | 15 − 30 cm | Mean | |
| CAI-24 | 3798 | 375 | 2087 | 745 | 46 | 396 | 58.3 | 2.8 | 30.5 |
| CAI-121 | 5859 | 667 | 3263 | 945 | 81 | 513 | 66.7 | 5.3 | 36.0 |
| CAI-127 | 6348 | 591 | 3470 | 1303 | 81 | 692 | 93.5 | 5.4 | 49.5 |
| KAI-32 | 6490 | 813 | 3652 | 1170 | 84 | 627 | 101.9 | 6.8 | 54.3 |
| KAI-90 | 5865 | 1319 | 3592 | 1009 | 153 | 581 | 79.7 | 9.8 | 44.8 |
| Control | 5776 | 588 | 3182 | 932 | 81 | 507 | 65.0 | 5.1 | 35.1 |
| SE ± | 121.9 (128.0)*** | 81.6*** | 22.5 (21.3)*** | 16.8*** | 2.59 (2.51)*** | 1.89*** | |||
| Mean | 5689 | 726 | 1017 | 88 | 77.5 | 5.9 | |||
| SE ± | 52.3*** | 8.7*** | 1.02*** | ||||||
| CV% | 7 | 7 | 10 | ||||||
SE = standard error; CV = coefficient of variance; *** = statistically significant at p = 0.001.
Effect of FOC antagonistic on soil biological activities and mineral nutrients at harvesting stage of rice cultivation
| Treatment | Microbial biomass C (μg g-1soil) | Microbial biomass N (μg g-1soil) | Dehydrogenase activity (μg TPF g-1soil 24 h-1) | Total N (g kg-1soil) | Available P (mg g-1soil) | Organic carbon (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAI-24 | 1715 | 60 | 94 | 2.456 | 0.133 | 1.49 |
| CAI-121 | 3293 | 65 | 113 | 1.992 | 0.117 | 1.47 |
| CAI-127 | 2875 | 88 | 194 | 2.644 | 0.115 | 1.52 |
| KAI-32 | 4020 | 65 | 135 | 2.142 | 0.122 | 1.66 |
| KAI-90 | 2946 | 62 | 136 | 2.160 | 0.129 | 1.62 |
| Control | 2861 | 58 | 111 | 1.190 | 0.087 | 1.47 |
| Mean | 2952 | 66 | 131 | 2.231 | 0.117 | 1.53 |
| SE ± | 150.5*** | 3.7** | 9.3*** | 0.063* | 0.005* | 0,032* |
| LSD (5%) | 520.7 | 12.0 | 29.7 | 0.229 | 0.019 | 0.116 |
| CV% | 9 | 10 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 3 |
C = carbon; N = nitrogen; P = phosphorous; SE = standard error; LSD = least significant difference; CV = coefficient of variance; * = statistically significant at 0.05; ** = statistically significant at p = 0.01; *** = statistically significant at p = 0.001.