| Literature DB >> 24255867 |
Subramaniam Gopalakrishnan1, Vadlamudi Srinivas, Meesala Sree Vidya, Abhishek Rathore.
Abstract
Five strains of Streptomyces (Entities:
Keywords: Antagonistic Streptomyces; Field evaluation; Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri; Plant growth promotion; Rice; Sorghum
Year: 2013 PMID: 24255867 PMCID: PMC3825066 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-574
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Figure 1Evaluation of the five strains antagonistic to FOC for their enzymatic activities.
Figure 2Evaluation of the five strains antagonistic to FOC for their tolerance of salinity, pH, temperature and fungicides (at field level application).
Evaluation of the five strains antagonistic to FOC for their plant growth promotion potential in sorghum under greenhouse conditions
| Treatment | Plant height (cm) | Leaf area (cm2) | Stem weight (g) | Leaf weight (g) | Root length (m plant-1) | Surface area (cm2plant-1) | Root volume (cm3plant-1) | Root dry weight (g plant-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAI-24 | 114 | 560 | 5.42 | 2.28 | 90 | 1003 | 10.2 | 0.92 |
| CAI-121 | 122 | 580 | 5.55 | 2.32 | 80 | 905 | 9.0 | 0.84 |
| CAI-127 | 100 | 624 | 5.09 | 2.35 | 88 | 922 | 9.3 | 0.87 |
| KAI-32 | 124 | 507 | 6.39 | 2.21 | 82 | 991 | 10.5 | 0.89 |
| KAI-90 | 130 | 589 | 7.03 | 2.41 | 78 | 973 | 10.5 | 1.01 |
| Control | 86 | 504 | 5.06 | 2.16 | 76 | 903 | 8.8 | 0.81 |
| Mean | 113 | 561 | 5.76 | 2.29 | 82 | 949 | 9.7 | 0.89 |
| SE± | 4.9*** | 27.5* | 0.471* | 0.048* | 3.4* | 13.9*** | 0.42* | 0.036* |
| LSD (5%) | 14.9 | 83.0 | 1.421 | 0.146 | 10.0 | 42.0 | 1.28 | 0.109 |
| CV% | 9 | 10 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 9 | 8 |
SE = standard error; LSD = least significant difference; CV = coefficient of variance; * = statistically significant at p = 0.05; *** = statistically significant at p = 0.001.
Effect of FOC antagonistic on the morphology and yield potential of rice cultivation
| Treatment | Plant height (cm) | Tillers number (m-2) | Primary panicles number | Secondary panicles number | Panicle length (cm) | Stover yield (g m-2) | Grain yield (g m-2) | Total dry matter (g m-2) | Test seed weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAI-24 | 85 | 586 | 11.9 | 29.8 | 24.8 | 584 | 587 | 1170 | 18.9 |
| CAI-121 | 81 | 506 | 11.8 | 26.5 | 24.5 | 637 | 583 | 1221 | 18.9 |
| CAI-127 | 80 | 501 | 12.1 | 31.0 | 24.6 | 754 | 619 | 1373 | 18.6 |
| KAI-32 | 82 | 532 | 12.2 | 28.3 | 25.0 | 754 | 640 | 1394 | 19.3 |
| KAI-90 | 81 | 589 | 11.7 | 27.8 | 24.5 | 693 | 587 | 1279 | 18.9 |
| Control | 80 | 459 | 11.4 | 25.0 | 24.4 | 601 | 582 | 1183 | 18.6 |
| Mean | 81 | 529 | 11.8 | 28.0 | 24.6 | 671 | 600 | 1270 | 18.9 |
| SE ± | 0.68*** | 15.6*** | 0.06** | 0.29*** | 0.09* | 27.8** | 9.7** | 31.9*** | 0.03*** |
| LSD (5%) | 2.0 | 47.1 | 0.22 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 87.7 | 30.5 | 100.4 | 0.11 |
| CV% | 2 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
SE = standard error; LSD = least significant difference; CV = coefficient of variance; * = statistically significant at p = 0.05; ** = statistically significant at p = 0.01; *** = statistically significant at p = 0.001.
Effect of FOC antagonistic on the root development of rice at harvesting stage of rice cultivation
| Treatment | Root length (m m-2) | Root volume (cm-3m-2) | Root dry weight (g m-2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 − 15 cm | 15 − 30 cm | Mean | 0 − 15 cm | 15 − 30 cm | Mean | 0 − 15 cm | 15 − 30 cm | Mean | |
| CAI-24 | 3798 | 375 | 2087 | 745 | 46 | 396 | 58.3 | 2.8 | 30.5 |
| CAI-121 | 5859 | 667 | 3263 | 945 | 81 | 513 | 66.7 | 5.3 | 36.0 |
| CAI-127 | 6348 | 591 | 3470 | 1303 | 81 | 692 | 93.5 | 5.4 | 49.5 |
| KAI-32 | 6490 | 813 | 3652 | 1170 | 84 | 627 | 101.9 | 6.8 | 54.3 |
| KAI-90 | 5865 | 1319 | 3592 | 1009 | 153 | 581 | 79.7 | 9.8 | 44.8 |
| Control | 5776 | 588 | 3182 | 932 | 81 | 507 | 65.0 | 5.1 | 35.1 |
| SE ± | 121.9 (128.0)*** | 81.6*** | 22.5 (21.3)*** | 16.8*** | 2.59 (2.51)*** | 1.89*** | |||
| Mean | 5689 | 726 | 1017 | 88 | 77.5 | 5.9 | |||
| SE ± | 52.3*** | 8.7*** | 1.02*** | ||||||
| CV% | 7 | 7 | 10 | ||||||
SE = standard error; CV = coefficient of variance; *** = statistically significant at p = 0.001.
Effect of FOC antagonistic on soil biological activities and mineral nutrients at harvesting stage of rice cultivation
| Treatment | Microbial biomass C (μg g-1soil) | Microbial biomass N (μg g-1soil) | Dehydrogenase activity (μg TPF g-1soil 24 h-1) | Total N (g kg-1soil) | Available P (mg g-1soil) | Organic carbon (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAI-24 | 1715 | 60 | 94 | 2.456 | 0.133 | 1.49 |
| CAI-121 | 3293 | 65 | 113 | 1.992 | 0.117 | 1.47 |
| CAI-127 | 2875 | 88 | 194 | 2.644 | 0.115 | 1.52 |
| KAI-32 | 4020 | 65 | 135 | 2.142 | 0.122 | 1.66 |
| KAI-90 | 2946 | 62 | 136 | 2.160 | 0.129 | 1.62 |
| Control | 2861 | 58 | 111 | 1.190 | 0.087 | 1.47 |
| Mean | 2952 | 66 | 131 | 2.231 | 0.117 | 1.53 |
| SE ± | 150.5*** | 3.7** | 9.3*** | 0.063* | 0.005* | 0,032* |
| LSD (5%) | 520.7 | 12.0 | 29.7 | 0.229 | 0.019 | 0.116 |
| CV% | 9 | 10 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 3 |
C = carbon; N = nitrogen; P = phosphorous; SE = standard error; LSD = least significant difference; CV = coefficient of variance; * = statistically significant at 0.05; ** = statistically significant at p = 0.01; *** = statistically significant at p = 0.001.