OBJECTIVE: To validate malnutrition screening tool of nutrition risk index (NRI) against patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) as a gold standard tool in colorectal cancer patients before radiotherapy. METHODS: Nutritional status of 52 volunteer colorectal cancer patients with a mean age of 54.1±16.8 years who referred to radiotherapy center were assessed by PG-SGA (gold standard method) and NRI. Serum albumin levels of patients were determined by colorimetric method. A contingency table was used to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the NRI in screening patients at risk of malnutrition, in comparison with the PG-SGA in patients before radiotherapy. RESULTS: The findings of PG-SGA and NRI showed that 52% and 45% of patients in our study were moderately or severely malnourished respectively. The NRI had a sensitivity of 66% and a specificity of 60% against PG-SGA. The positive predictive value was 64% and the negative predicative value was 62%. The agreement between NRI and PG-SGA was statistically insignificant (kappa =0.267; P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of present study showed that the prevalence of malnutrition was high in patients with colorectal cancer. Moreover, NRI method had low sensitivity and specificity in assessing nutritional status of patients with cancer. It seems that the combination of anthropometric, laboratory parameters and a subjective scoring system may be helpful tools in screening of malnutrition in cancer patients.
OBJECTIVE: To validate malnutrition screening tool of nutrition risk index (NRI) against patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) as a gold standard tool in colorectal cancerpatients before radiotherapy. METHODS: Nutritional status of 52 volunteer colorectal cancerpatients with a mean age of 54.1±16.8 years who referred to radiotherapy center were assessed by PG-SGA (gold standard method) and NRI. Serum albumin levels of patients were determined by colorimetric method. A contingency table was used to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the NRI in screening patients at risk of malnutrition, in comparison with the PG-SGA in patients before radiotherapy. RESULTS: The findings of PG-SGA and NRI showed that 52% and 45% of patients in our study were moderately or severely malnourished respectively. The NRI had a sensitivity of 66% and a specificity of 60% against PG-SGA. The positive predictive value was 64% and the negative predicative value was 62%. The agreement between NRI and PG-SGA was statistically insignificant (kappa =0.267; P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of present study showed that the prevalence of malnutrition was high in patients with colorectal cancer. Moreover, NRI method had low sensitivity and specificity in assessing nutritional status of patients with cancer. It seems that the combination of anthropometric, laboratory parameters and a subjective scoring system may be helpful tools in screening of malnutrition in cancerpatients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Colorectal cancer patients; malnutrition; nutrition risk index (NRI); patient-generated subjective global assessment
Authors: Cheryl L Rock; Colleen Doyle; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; Kerry S Courneya; Anna L Schwartz; Elisa V Bandera; Kathryn K Hamilton; Barbara Grant; Marji McCullough; Tim Byers; Ted Gansler Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Digant Gupta; Christopher G Lis; Joel Granick; James F Grutsch; Pankaj G Vashi; Carolyn A Lammersfeld Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2006-04-19 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Oliver Galvan; Michael Joannidis; Andreas Widschwendter; Hugo Bonatti; Georg Matthias Sprinzl; Peter Rehak; Doris Balogh; Johann Michael Hackl Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2004-09-30 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: W D Dewys; C Begg; P T Lavin; P R Band; J M Bennett; J R Bertino; M H Cohen; H O Douglass; P F Engstrom; E Z Ezdinli; J Horton; G J Johnson; C G Moertel; M M Oken; C Perlia; C Rosenbaum; M N Silverstein; R T Skeel; R W Sponzo; D C Tormey Journal: Am J Med Date: 1980-10 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Digant Gupta; Christopher G Lis; Sadie L Dahlk; Jessica King; Pankaj G Vashi; James F Grutsch; Carolyn A Lammersfeld Journal: Nutr J Date: 2008-06-30 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Cheguevara Afaneh; Deborah Gerszberg; Eoin Slattery; David S Seres; John A Chabot; Michael D Kluger Journal: Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 7.293
Authors: Ashna Gupta; Eisha Gupta; Richard Hilsden; Jeffry D Hawel; Ahmad I Elnahas; Christopher M Schlachta; Nawar A Alkhamesi Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 2.089