BACKGROUND: Chest pain decision unit (CDU) evaluation of patients with acute chest pain (ACP) and nondiagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG) usually includes noninvasive testing for coronary artery disease (CAD). HYPOTHESIS: CAD evaluation will not improve clinical outcome in low-risk ACP patients. METHODS: We studied 459 adults admitted to CDU with ACP and no troponin release who underwent noninvasive CAD testing (stress testing in 396 and coronary computed tomographic angiography in 63). Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine predictors of adverse outcome over a 3-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Initial noninvasive test was normal in 367 (80%) and abnormal (positive or indeterminate) in 92 (20%). A total of 42 (9%) patients underwent invasive coronary angiography, and 16 (3.5%) underwent revascularization. During follow-up, 33 patients had a total of 36 major clinical events: 12 revascularizations, 9 myocardial infarctions, and 15 deaths. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified abnormal ECG (odds ratio [OR]: 2.7, P = 0.03), typical chest pain (OR: 3.8, P = 0.002), diabetes (OR: 4.1, P = 0.001), and known CAD (OR: 2.3, P = 0.03) as independent predictors for adverse outcome, but not noninvasive test result. Thus, in 187 patients with no high-risk features (41% of the cohort), the annualized event rate was 0.5%. In 272 patients with at least 1 high-risk feature, annualized event rates were 2.8% and 5.7% when noninvasive test was normal or abnormal, respectively (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical risk stratification allows identification of patients at low risk of adverse outcome over an intermediate period of follow-up. Noninvasive testing is not warranted in such patients.
BACKGROUND:Chest pain decision unit (CDU) evaluation of patients with acute chest pain (ACP) and nondiagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG) usually includes noninvasive testing for coronary artery disease (CAD). HYPOTHESIS: CAD evaluation will not improve clinical outcome in low-risk ACPpatients. METHODS: We studied 459 adults admitted to CDU with ACP and no troponin release who underwent noninvasive CAD testing (stress testing in 396 and coronary computed tomographic angiography in 63). Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine predictors of adverse outcome over a 3-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Initial noninvasive test was normal in 367 (80%) and abnormal (positive or indeterminate) in 92 (20%). A total of 42 (9%) patients underwent invasive coronary angiography, and 16 (3.5%) underwent revascularization. During follow-up, 33 patients had a total of 36 major clinical events: 12 revascularizations, 9 myocardial infarctions, and 15 deaths. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified abnormal ECG (odds ratio [OR]: 2.7, P = 0.03), typical chest pain (OR: 3.8, P = 0.002), diabetes (OR: 4.1, P = 0.001), and known CAD (OR: 2.3, P = 0.03) as independent predictors for adverse outcome, but not noninvasive test result. Thus, in 187 patients with no high-risk features (41% of the cohort), the annualized event rate was 0.5%. In 272 patients with at least 1 high-risk feature, annualized event rates were 2.8% and 5.7% when noninvasive test was normal or abnormal, respectively (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical risk stratification allows identification of patients at low risk of adverse outcome over an intermediate period of follow-up. Noninvasive testing is not warranted in such patients.
Authors: Michael J Zellweger; Rory Hachamovitch; Xingping Kang; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Guido Germano; Matthias E Pfisterer; Daniel S Berman Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: R D Welch; R J Zalenski; P D Frederick; J A Malmgren; S Compton; M Grzybowski; S Thomas; T Kowalenko; N R Every Journal: JAMA Date: 2001 Oct 24-31 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: L Durairaj; B Reilly; K Das; C Smith; C Acob; S Husain; M Saquib; P Ganschow; A Evans; R McNutt Journal: Am J Med Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: J H Pope; T P Aufderheide; R Ruthazer; R H Woolard; J A Feldman; J R Beshansky; J L Griffith; H P Selker Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-04-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrea De Lorenzo; Ronaldo S L Lima; Aristarco G Siqueira-Filho; Mauricio R Pantoja Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Tauqir Y Goraya; Cynthia L Leibson; Pasquale J Palumbo; Susan A Weston; Jill M Killian; Eric A Pfeifer; Steven J Jacobsen; Robert L Frye; Véronique L Roger Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-09-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Hussain A Isma'eel; George E Sakr; Mustapha Serhan; Nader Lamaa; Ayman Hakim; Paul C Cremer; Wael A Jaber; Torkom Garabedian; Imad Elhajj; Antoine B Abchee Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: David E Winchester; John Brandt; Carla Schmidt; Brandon Allen; Thomas Payton; Ezra A Amsterdam Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 2.778