Literature DB >> 11667934

Prognostic value of a normal or nonspecific initial electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction.

R D Welch1, R J Zalenski, P D Frederick, J A Malmgren, S Compton, M Grzybowski, S Thomas, T Kowalenko, N R Every.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although previous studies have suggested that normal and nonspecific initial electrocardiograms (ECGs) are associated with a favorable prognosis for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), their independent predictive value for mortality has not been examined.
OBJECTIVE: To compare in-hospital mortality among patients with AMI who have normal or nonspecific initial ECGs with that of patients who have diagnostic ECGs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Multihospital observational study in which 391 208 patients with AMI met the study criteria between June 1994 and June 2000 and had ECGs that were normal (n = 30 759), nonspecific (n = 137 574), or diagnostic (n = 222 875; defined as ST-segment elevation or depression and/or left bundle-branch block). A logistic regression model was constructed using a propensity score for ECG findings and data on demographics, medical history, diagnostic procedures, and therapy to determine the independent prognostic value of a normal or nonspecific initial ECG. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital mortality; composite outcome of in-hospital death and life-threatening adverse events.
RESULTS: In-hospital mortality rates were 5.7%, 8.7%, and 11.5% while the rates of the composite of mortality and life-threatening adverse events were 19.2%, 27.5%, and 34.9% for the normal, nonspecific, and diagnostic ECG groups, respectively. After adjusting for other predictor variables, the odds of mortality for the normal ECG group was 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.63; P<.001) and for the nonspecific group was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.68-0.72; P<.001), compared with the diagnostic ECG group.
CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of patients with AMI, patients presenting with normal or nonspecific ECGs did have lower in-hospital mortality rates than those of patients with diagnostic ECGs, yet the absolute rates were still unexpectedly high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11667934     DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.16.1977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  14 in total

Review 1.  Acute rest myocardial perfusion imaging for chest pain.

Authors:  Michael C Kontos; Frans J Th Wackers
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Manisha Joshi; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Kenneth J Rothman; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Myocardial perfusion imaging in the acute care setting.

Authors:  Michael C Kontos
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Normal prehospital electrocardiography is linked to long-term survival in patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Jessica K Zègre-Hemsey; Claire E Sommargren; Josephine K Asafu-Adjei; Barbara J Drew
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 1.438

5.  Impact of clinical predictors and routine coronary artery disease testing on outcome of patients admitted to chest pain decision unit.

Authors:  Vlad Cotarlan; David Ho; John Pineda; Anwer Qureshi; Jamshid Shirani
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 6.  Cardiac markers in the low-risk chest pain patient.

Authors:  Scott G Weiner; Shamai A Grossman
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

7.  Correlation of Reciprocal Changes and QRS Amplitude in ECG to Left Ventricular Dysfunction, Wall Motion Score and Clinical Outcome in First Time ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Silpita Katragadda; Murali Alagesan; Shanmugasundaram Rathakrishnan; Deepalakshmi Kaliyaperumal; Anith Kumar Mambatta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-07-01

Review 8.  The clinics of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Gianfranco Cervellin; Gianni Rastelli
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-05

9.  Type 2 myocardial infarction following generalized tonic-clonic seizure.

Authors:  Jinkyu Park; Jeong Hun Shin; Seok Hwan Kim; Young-Hyo Lim; Jae Ung Lee; Kyung-Soo Kim; Soon-Kil Kim; Jeong Hyun Kim; Heon Kil Lim; Jinho Shin
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.243

10.  Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio and Its Relation with Markers of Inflammation and Myocardial Necrosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Ema Tahto; Radivoj Jadric; Lamija Pojskic; Esmeralda Kicic
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2017-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.