Literature DB >> 11152858

Emergency department admissions to inpatient cardiac telemetry beds: a prospective cohort study of risk stratification and outcomes.

L Durairaj1, B Reilly, K Das, C Smith, C Acob, S Husain, M Saquib, P Ganschow, A Evans, R McNutt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Little is known about physicians' use of inpatient cardiac telemetry units among emergency department patients at risk for cardiac complications. We therefore studied the outcomes of patients admitted to inpatient telemetry beds to identify a subset of patients from whom cardiac monitoring could be withheld safely. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 1, 033 consecutive adult patients admitted to an inpatient telemetry unit from the emergency department of a 700-bed urban public teaching hospital. Subjects with or without chest pain were risk-stratified using a prediction rule and observed for in-hospital cardiac complications, acute myocardial infarction, and transfer to an intensive care unit (ICU).
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between patients with (n = 677) or patients without chest pain (n = 356) in the rates of major cardiac complications, myocardial infarctions, or transfers to an ICU. Among 318 patients with chest pain who were classified as being very low risk, none suffered major complications (negative predictive value 100%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 98.8% to 100%). Among 214 very low risk patients without chest pain, 1 (0.5%) had a major complication (negative predictive value 99.5%; 95% CI: 97.4% to 99.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: The prediction rule accurately identified patients with or without chest pain who were at very low risk of major complications, identifying a subset from whom cardiac monitoring could be withheld safely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11152858     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00640-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  7 in total

1.  Unnecessary arrhythmia monitoring and underutilization of ischemia and QT interval monitoring in current clinical practice: baseline results of the Practical Use of the Latest Standards for Electrocardiography trial.

Authors:  Marjorie Funk; Catherine G Winkler; Jeanine L May; Kimberly Stephens; Kristopher P Fennie; Leonie L Rose; Yasemin E Turkman; Barbara J Drew
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 1.438

2.  Use and outcomes of telemetry monitoring on a medicine service.

Authors:  Nader Najafi; Andrew Auerbach
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-09-24

3.  Impact of clinical predictors and routine coronary artery disease testing on outcome of patients admitted to chest pain decision unit.

Authors:  Vlad Cotarlan; David Ho; John Pineda; Anwer Qureshi; Jamshid Shirani
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Cost-effectiveness of telemetry for hospitalized patients with low-risk chest pain.

Authors:  Michael J Ward; Mark H Eckman; Daniel P Schauer; Ali S Raja; Sean Collins
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  A comparative analysis of risk stratification tools for emergency department patients with chest pain.

Authors:  Ellen Burkett; Thomas Marwick; Ogilvie Thom; Anne-Maree Kelly
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-02-07

6.  Received care compared to ADP-guided care of patients admitted to hospital with chest pain of possible cardiac origin.

Authors:  Michael Perera; Leena Aggarwal; Ian A Scott; Bentley Logan
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2018-09-03

7.  A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology.

Authors:  Erik P Hess; George A Wells; Allan Jaffe; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2008-02-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.