Literature DB >> 24254809

Egocentric reference frame bias in the palmar haptic perception of surface orientation.

Allison Coleman1, Frank H Durgin.   

Abstract

The effect of egocentric reference frames on palmar haptic perception of orientation was investigated in vertically separated locations in a sagittal plane. Reference stimuli to be haptically matched were presented either haptically (to the contralateral hand) or visually. As in prior investigations of haptic orientation perception, a strong egocentric bias was found, such that haptic orientation matches made in the lower part of personal space were much lower (i.e., were perceived as being higher) than those made at eye level. The same haptic bias was observed both when the reference surface to be matched was observed visually and when bimanual matching was used. These findings support the conclusion that, despite the presence of an unambiguous allocentric (gravitational) reference frame in vertical planes, haptic orientation perception in the sagittal plane reflects an egocentric bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24254809      PMCID: PMC4028437          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0552-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  10 in total

1.  Large systematic deviations in the haptic perception of parallelity.

Authors:  A M Kappers
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Reference frames and haptic perception of orientation: body and head tilt effects on the oblique effect.

Authors:  M Luyat; E Gentaz; T R Corte; M Guerraz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

3.  Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane.

Authors:  Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2002-01

4.  Slant perception in near space is categorically biased: evidence for a vertical tendency.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin; Zhi Li; Alen Hajnal
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The contributions of egocentric and allocentric reference frames in haptic spatial tasks.

Authors:  Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2004-11

6.  Haptic parallelity perception on the frontoparallel plane: the involvement of reference frames.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Astrid M L Kappers; Jan J Koenderink
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-02

7.  Palm boards are not action measures: an alternative to the two-systems theory of geographical slant perception.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin; Alen Hajnal; Zhi Li; Natasha Tonge; Anthony Stigliani
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-02-21

8.  Role of gravitational cues in the haptic perception of orientation.

Authors:  E Gentaz; Y Hatwell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-11

9.  The haptic 'oblique effect' in children's and adults' perception of orientation.

Authors:  E Gentaz; Y Hatwell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Allocentric and egocentric reference frames in the processing of three-dimensional haptic space.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Manual anchoring biases in slant estimation affect matches even for near surfaces.

Authors:  Dennis M Shaffer; Eric McManama; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

2.  Anchoring in action: manual estimates of slant are powerfully biased toward initial hand orientation and are correlated with verbal report.

Authors:  Dennis M Shaffer; Eric McManama; Charles Swank; Morgan Williams; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  What do hands know about hills? Interpreting Taylor-Covill and Eves (2013) in context.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-08-09

4.  Do Visual and Vestibular Inputs Compensate for Somatosensory Loss in the Perception of Spatial Orientation? Insights from a Deafferented Patient.

Authors:  Lionel Bringoux; Cécile Scotto Di Cesare; Liliane Borel; Thomas Macaluso; Fabrice R Sarlegna
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Cross-Modal Transfer of the Tilt Aftereffect From Vision to Touch.

Authors:  Dafni Krystallidou; Peter Thompson
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-10-03

6.  Do Individual Differences and Aging Effects in the Estimation of Geographical Slant Reflect Cognitive or Perceptual Effects?

Authors:  Abigail M Dean; Jaehyun Oh; Christopher J Thomson; Catherine J Norris; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-07-18

7.  Response Modality vs. Target Modality: Sensory Transformations and Comparisons in Cross-modal Slant Matching Tasks.

Authors:  Juan Liu; Hiroshi Ando
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.