Literature DB >> 11767728

Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane.

Astrid M L Kappers1.   

Abstract

Previous studies [Perception 28 (1999) 1001; Perception 28 (1999) 781] on the haptic perception of parallelity on a horizontal plane showed that what subjects haptically perceive as being parallel deviates considerably from what is physically parallel. The deviations could be described with a subject-dependent orientation gradient in the left-right direction. The gradients found in the bimanual conditions were significantly larger (about 70%) than those in the unimanual conditions. The questions to be answered in the present study are the following: (1) Does the haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane also show systematic deviations from veridicality? (2) Are the unimanual and bimanual performances again quantitatively but not qualitatively different? The set-up consisted of a plate positioned in the midsagittal plane of the subject. The subject touched the right side of the plate with his/her right hand and the left side with the left hand. The results show again large systematic deviations. The major part of the deviations can be described by means of a subject-dependent orientation gradient in the vertical direction. The quantitative (but not qualitative) difference between the unimanual and the bimanual conditions is much larger in the midsagittal plane than in the horizontal plane.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11767728     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(01)00047-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  20 in total

1.  Multisensory integration mechanisms in haptic space perception.

Authors:  Sander Zuidhoek; Albertine Visser; Merle E Bredero; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Factors affecting the size of the detour effect in the kinaesthetic perception of Euclidean distance.

Authors:  Henry Faineteau; Edouard Gentaz; Paolo Viviani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Haptic shape discrimination in humans: insight into haptic frames of reference.

Authors:  Julien Voisin; Guillaume Michaud; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Role of force cues in the haptic estimations of a virtual length.

Authors:  Pierre Wydoodt; Edouard Gentaz; Arlette Streri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hand orientation is insufficiently compensated for in haptic spatial perception.

Authors:  Astrid M L Kappers; Roderik F Viergever
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Haptic spatial matching in near peripersonal space.

Authors:  Amanda L Kaas; Hanneke I van Mier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The haptic reproduction of orientations in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  Gabriel Baud-Bovy; Edouard Gentaz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Superior spatial touch: improved haptic orientation processing in deaf individuals.

Authors:  Rick van Dijk; Astrid M L Kappers; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Haptic two-dimensional angle categorization and discrimination.

Authors:  Iuliana Toderita; Stéphanie Bourgeon; Julien I A Voisin; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Allocentric and egocentric reference frames in the processing of three-dimensional haptic space.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.