Literature DB >> 10664750

Large systematic deviations in the haptic perception of parallelity.

A M Kappers1.   

Abstract

Recently, Kappers and Koenderink (1999 Perception 28 781-795) showed that what subjects haptically perceive as parallel often deviates greatly from what is actually physically parallel. In their experiment, subjects had to rotate a test bar in such a way that it felt as though it was parallel to a reference bar. Their data were obtained with the right hand on a table plane to the right side of the median plane of the subject. The present study extends that work in a number of ways: (1) the locations of the stimuli cover the total reachable table plane; (2) distances between stimuli can also be large (more than 1 m); (3) experiments are done both unimanually (with the right and left hand) and bimanually. Like in the previous study, the results show large systematic deviations that correlate significantly with horizontal (left-right) distance between the two bars but not with vertical (forward-backward) distance. Thus we have established that a description of the results in terms of a horizontal gradient in the deviations is valid over a large part of haptic space, over large distances, and in both unimanual and bimanual conditions. The subject-dependent horizontal gradients ranged from -12 degrees m-1 to -27 degrees m-1 in the present experiment. In all conditions a significant haptic oblique effect can be demonstrated.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10664750     DOI: 10.1068/p281001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  35 in total

1.  Delay improves performance on a haptic spatial matching task.

Authors:  Sander Zuidhoek; Astrid M L Kappers; Rob H J van der Lubbe; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Bias and sensitivity in the haptic perception of geometry.

Authors:  Denise Y P Henriques; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  The Interface Theory of Perception.

Authors:  Donald D Hoffman; Manish Singh; Chetan Prakash
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

4.  Haptic shape discrimination in humans: insight into haptic frames of reference.

Authors:  Julien Voisin; Guillaume Michaud; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hand orientation is insufficiently compensated for in haptic spatial perception.

Authors:  Astrid M L Kappers; Roderik F Viergever
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The role of contextual cues in the haptic perception of orientations and the oblique effect.

Authors:  Marion Luyat; Christine Moroni; Edouard Gentaz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

7.  Haptic spatial matching in near peripersonal space.

Authors:  Amanda L Kaas; Hanneke I van Mier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The haptic reproduction of orientations in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  Gabriel Baud-Bovy; Edouard Gentaz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Multiple Factors Underlying Haptic Perception of Length and Orientation.

Authors:  John F Soechting; Martha Flanders
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.487

10.  Superior spatial touch: improved haptic orientation processing in deaf individuals.

Authors:  Rick van Dijk; Astrid M L Kappers; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.