Literature DB >> 24254567

ACL reconstruction with hamstrings: how different technique and fixation devices influence bone tunnel enlargement.

R Iorio1, V Di Sanzo, A Vadalà, J Conteduca, D Mazza, A Redler, G Bolle, F Conteduca, A Ferretti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is well documented in the literature. The cause of this tunnel enlargement is unclear, but is thought to be multifactorial, with mechanical and biological factors playing a role. AIM: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate how the different techniques may affect the bone tunnel enlargement and clinical outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with autologous doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons entered this study. They were randomly assigned to enter group A (In-Out technique, with cortical fixation and Interference screw) and group B (Out-In technique, metal cortical fixation on the femour and tibia). At a mean follow-up of 10 months, all the patients underwent CT scan exam to evaluate the post-operative diameters of both femoral and they underwent tibial tunnels clinical examination after 24 months.
RESULTS: The mean femoral tunnel diameter increased significantly from 9.05±0.3 mm to 10.01±2.3 mm in group A and from 9.04±0.8 mm to 9.3±1.12 mm in group B. The mean increase in femoral tunnel diameters observed in group A was significantly higher than that observed in group B (p < 0.05) The mean tibial tunnel diameter increased significantly from 9.03±0.04 mm to 10.68±2.5 mm in group A and from 9.04±0.03 mm to 10.±0.78 mm in group B. The mean increase in tibial tunnel diameters observed in group A was significantly higher than that observed in group B (p < 0.05). No clinical differences were found between two groups and no correlations between clinical and radiological results were found in any patients of both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of the study suggest that different mechanical fixation devices could influence tunnel widening. The lower stiffness of the fixation devices is probably responsible of the tunnel widening through the fixation devices's micromotions in the femoral and tibial tunnels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24254567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci        ISSN: 1128-3602            Impact factor:   3.507


  12 in total

1.  Quantification of tibial bone loss in antegrade versus retrograde tunnel placement for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael Osti; Alessa Krawinkel; Thomas Hoffelner; Karl Peter Benedetto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Biomechanical Comparison Between Bashti Bone Plug Technique and Biodegradable Screw for Fixation of Grafts in Ligament surgery.

Authors:  Kaveh Bashti; Mohammad N Tahmasebi; Hasan Kaseb; Farzam Farahmand; Mohammad Akbar; Amir Mobini
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-01-15

3.  Can the outside-in half-tunnel technique reduce femoral tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A CT study.

Authors:  Riccardo Maria Lanzetti; Domenico Lupariello; Angelo De Carli; Edoardo Monaco; Matteo Guzzini; Mattia Fabbri; Antonio Vadalà; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-07

4.  Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Widening following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Various Modalities of Fixation: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Dileep Krishnamoorthy Srinivas; Mahesha Kanthila; Rama Prakasha Saya; Jvs Vidyasagar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

5.  [Lengths of the fixed loop and the adjustable loop in the coarse bone tunnel were compared to influence the widening of the femoral bone tunnel and the function of the knee joint].

Authors:  Y Yin; Y Mei; Z G Wang; S Y Song; P F Liu; P F He; W J Wu; X Xie
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-10-18

6.  Comparison of Rapid Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Tensioning Technique and Traditional Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Tianfu Jin; Yanlin Li; Guiran Yang; Xinyu Liao; Guoliang Wang; Fuke Wang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Bone Tunnel Impaction Reduced the Tibial Tunnel Enlargement.

Authors:  Huan Xu; Rongzong Zheng; Jinhe Ying
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2017-05-11

8.  Investigating the biological response of human mesenchymal stem cells to titanium surfaces.

Authors:  Matthew J German; Charles Osei-Bempong; Callie A Knuth; David J Deehan; Rachel A Oldershaw
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Bone Tunnel Diameter Measured with CT after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Double-Bundle Auto-Hamstring Tendons: Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Soo Jeong Yoon; Young Cheol Yoon; So Young Bae; Joon Ho Wang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Comparison of Outcomes of Two Femoral Fixation Devices in Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Sánchez-Carrasco; Juan Francisco Abellán; Salima Qudsi-Sinclair; Guadalupe Ruiz-Merino; Francisco Javier Carrillo-Juliá; David Bo-Rueda
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.