Literature DB >> 24254317

Breast density quantification with cone-beam CT: a post-mortem study.

Travis Johnson, Huanjun Ding, Huy Q Le, Justin L Ducote, Sabee Molloi.   

Abstract

Forty post-mortem breasts were imaged with a flat-panel based cone-beam x-ray CT system at 50 kVp. The feasibility of breast density quantification has been investigated using standard histogram thresholding and an automatic segmentation method based on the fuzzy c-means algorithm (FCM). The breasts were chemically decomposed into water, lipid, and protein immediately after image acquisition was completed. The per cent fibroglandular volume (%FGV) from chemical analysis was used as the gold standard for breast density comparison. Both image-based segmentation techniques showed good precision in breast density quantification with high linear coefficients between the right and left breast of each pair. When comparing with the gold standard using %FGV from chemical analysis, Pearson's r-values were estimated to be 0.983 and 0.968 for the FCM clustering and the histogram thresholding techniques, respectively. The standard error of the estimate was also reduced from 3.92% to 2.45% by applying the automatic clustering technique. The results of the postmortem study suggested that breast tissue can be characterized in terms of water, lipid and protein contents with high accuracy by using chemical analysis, which offers a gold standard for breast density studies comparing different techniques. In the investigated image segmentation techniques, the FCM algorithm had high precision and accuracy in breast density quantification. In comparison to conventional histogram thresholding, it was more efficient and reduced inter-observer variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24254317      PMCID: PMC3904793          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/23/8573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  41 in total

1.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Helen Guo; Lisa J Martin; Limei Sun; Jennifer Stone; Eve Fishell; Roberta A Jong; Greg Hislop; Anna Chiarelli; Salomon Minkin; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: feasibility study with surgical mastectomy specimens.

Authors:  Wei Tse Yang; Selin Carkaci; Lingyun Chen; Chao-Jen Lai; Aysegul Sahin; Gary J Whitman; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Visibility of microcalcification in cone beam breast CT: effects of X-ray tube voltage and radiation dose.

Authors:  Chao-Jen Lai; Chris C Shaw; Lingyun Chen; Mustafa C Altunbas; Xinming Liu; Tao Han; Tianpeng Wang; Wei T Yang; Gary J Whitman; Shu-Ju Tu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The myth of the 50-50 breast.

Authors:  M J Yaffe; J M Boone; N Packard; O Alonzo-Proulx; S Y Huang; C L Peressotti; A Al-Mayah; K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Differences and similarities in breast cancer risk assessment models in clinical practice: which model to choose?

Authors:  Catharina E Jacobi; Geertruida H de Bock; Bob Siegerink; Christi J van Asperen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Valerie A McCormack; Isabel dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Karen K Lindfors; John M Boone; Thomas R Nelson; Kai Yang; Alexander L C Kwan; DeWitt F Miller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Breast CT.

Authors:  Stephen J Glick
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 10.  Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; Carla H van Gils; Thomas A Sellers; Karthik Ghosh; Sandhya Pruthi; Kathleen R Brandt; V Shane Pankratz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  10 in total

1.  Breast density quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with bias field correction: a postmortem study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Travis Johnson; Muqing Lin; Huy Q Le; Justin L Ducote; Min-Ying Su; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  How does semi-automated computer-derived CT measure of breast density compare with subjective assessments to assess mean glandular breast density, in patients with breast cancer?

Authors:  G J Bansal; S Kotugodella
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Breast density evaluation using spectral mammography, radiologist reader assessment, and segmentation techniques: a retrospective study based on left and right breast comparison.

Authors:  Sabee Molloi; Huanjun Ding; Stephen Feig
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Postmortem validation of breast density using dual-energy mammography.

Authors:  Sabee Molloi; Justin L Ducote; Huanjun Ding; Stephen A Feig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Breast tissue decomposition with spectral distortion correction: a postmortem study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Bo Zhao; Pavlo Baturin; Farnaz Behroozi; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Quantification of breast lesion compositions using low-dose spectral mammography: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; David Sennung; Hyo-Min Cho; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A PDE Model of Breast Tumor Progression in MMTV-PyMT Mice.

Authors:  Navid Mohammad Mirzaei; Zuzana Tatarova; Wenrui Hao; Navid Changizi; Alireza Asadpoure; Ioannis K Zervantonakis; Yu Hu; Young Hwan Chang; Leili Shahriyari
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-17

8.  Breast tissue characterization with photon-counting spectral CT imaging: a postmortem breast study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Michael J Klopfer; Justin L Ducote; Fumitaro Masaki; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Dedicated breast CT: state of the art-Part II. Clinical application and future outlook.

Authors:  Yueqiang Zhu; Avice M O'Connell; Yue Ma; Aidi Liu; Haijie Li; Yuwei Zhang; Xiaohua Zhang; Zhaoxiang Ye
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Characterization of arterial plaque composition with dual energy computed tomography: a simulation study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Chenggong Wang; Shant Malkasian; Travis Johnson; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.357

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.