Léo Fradet1, Pierre-Jean Arnoux, Jean-Philippe Ranjeva, Yvan Petit, Virginie Callot. 1. *Department of Mechanical Engineering, École de technologie supérieure, Montreal, Quebec, Canada †Department of Medical Engineering, Research Center, Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada ‡Laboratoire de Biomécanique Appliquée, Aix-Marseille Université, IFSTTAR-, Faculté de Médecine secteur Nord, Marseille, Cedex, France; and §Centre de Résonance Magnétique Biologique et Médicale (CRMBM), Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Marseille, France.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Measurements of cervical and thoracolumbar human spinal cord (SC) geometry based on in vivo magnetic resonance imaging and investigation of morphological "invariants." OBJECTIVE: The current work aims at providing morphological features of the complete in vivo human normal SC and at investigating possible "invariant" parameters that may serve as normative data for individualized study of SC injuries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few in vivo magnetic resonance image-based studies have described human SC morphology at the cervical level, and similar description of the entire SC only relies on postmortem studies, which may be prone to atrophy biases. Moreover, large interindividual variations currently limit the use of morphological metrics as reference for clinical applications or as modeling inputs. METHODS: Absolute metrics of SC (transverse and anteroposterior diameters, width of anterior and posterior horns, cross-sectional SC area, and white matter percentage) were measured using semiautomatic segmentation of high resolution in vivo T2*-weighted transverse images acquired at 3 T, at each SC level, on healthy young (N = 15) and older (N = 8) volunteers. Robustness of measurements, effects of subject, age, or sex, as well as comparison with previously published postmortem data were investigated using statistical analyses (separate analysis of variance, Tukey-HSD, Bland-Altman). Normalized-to-C3 parameters were evaluated as invariants using a leave-one-out analysis. Spinal canal parameters were measured and occupation ratio border values were determined. RESULTS: Metrics of SC morphology showed large intra- and interindividual variations, up to 30% and 13%, respectively, on average. Sex had no influence except on posterior horn width (P < 0.01). Age-related differences were observed for anteroposterior diameter and white matter percentage (P < 0.05) and all postmortem metrics were significantly lower than in vivo values (P < 0.001). In vivo normalized SC area and diameters seemed to be invariants (R > 0.74, root-mean-square deviation < 10%). Finally, minimal and maximal occupation ratio were 0.2 and 0.6, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study presented morphological characteristics of the complete in vivo human SC. Significant differences linked to age and postmortem state have been identified. Morphological "invariants" that could be used to calculate the normally expected morphology accurately, were also identified. These observations should benefit to biomechanical and SC pathology studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
STUDY DESIGN: Measurements of cervical and thoracolumbar human spinal cord (SC) geometry based on in vivo magnetic resonance imaging and investigation of morphological "invariants." OBJECTIVE: The current work aims at providing morphological features of the complete in vivo human normal SC and at investigating possible "invariant" parameters that may serve as normative data for individualized study of SC injuries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few in vivo magnetic resonance image-based studies have described human SC morphology at the cervical level, and similar description of the entire SC only relies on postmortem studies, which may be prone to atrophy biases. Moreover, large interindividual variations currently limit the use of morphological metrics as reference for clinical applications or as modeling inputs. METHODS: Absolute metrics of SC (transverse and anteroposterior diameters, width of anterior and posterior horns, cross-sectional SC area, and white matter percentage) were measured using semiautomatic segmentation of high resolution in vivo T2*-weighted transverse images acquired at 3 T, at each SC level, on healthy young (N = 15) and older (N = 8) volunteers. Robustness of measurements, effects of subject, age, or sex, as well as comparison with previously published postmortem data were investigated using statistical analyses (separate analysis of variance, Tukey-HSD, Bland-Altman). Normalized-to-C3 parameters were evaluated as invariants using a leave-one-out analysis. Spinal canal parameters were measured and occupation ratio border values were determined. RESULTS: Metrics of SC morphology showed large intra- and interindividual variations, up to 30% and 13%, respectively, on average. Sex had no influence except on posterior horn width (P < 0.01). Age-related differences were observed for anteroposterior diameter and white matter percentage (P < 0.05) and all postmortem metrics were significantly lower than in vivo values (P < 0.001). In vivo normalized SC area and diameters seemed to be invariants (R > 0.74, root-mean-square deviation < 10%). Finally, minimal and maximal occupation ratio were 0.2 and 0.6, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study presented morphological characteristics of the complete in vivo human SC. Significant differences linked to age and postmortem state have been identified. Morphological "invariants" that could be used to calculate the normally expected morphology accurately, were also identified. These observations should benefit to biomechanical and SC pathology studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
Authors: Nico Papinutto; Carlo Asteggiano; Antje Bischof; Tristan J Gundel; Eduardo Caverzasi; William A Stern; Stefano Bastianello; Stephen L Hauser; Roland G Henry Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Julien Cohen-Adad; Eva Alonso-Ortiz; Mihael Abramovic; Carina Arneitz; Nicole Atcheson; Laura Barlow; Robert L Barry; Markus Barth; Marco Battiston; Christian Büchel; Matthew Budde; Virginie Callot; Anna J E Combes; Benjamin De Leener; Maxime Descoteaux; Paulo Loureiro de Sousa; Marek Dostál; Julien Doyon; Adam Dvorak; Falk Eippert; Karla R Epperson; Kevin S Epperson; Patrick Freund; Jürgen Finsterbusch; Alexandru Foias; Michela Fratini; Issei Fukunaga; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott; Giancarlo Germani; Guillaume Gilbert; Federico Giove; Charley Gros; Francesco Grussu; Akifumi Hagiwara; Pierre-Gilles Henry; Tomáš Horák; Masaaki Hori; James Joers; Kouhei Kamiya; Haleh Karbasforoushan; Miloš Keřkovský; Ali Khatibi; Joo-Won Kim; Nawal Kinany; Hagen Kitzler; Shannon Kolind; Yazhuo Kong; Petr Kudlička; Paul Kuntke; Nyoman D Kurniawan; Slawomir Kusmia; René Labounek; Maria Marcella Laganà; Cornelia Laule; Christine S Law; Christophe Lenglet; Tobias Leutritz; Yaou Liu; Sara Llufriu; Sean Mackey; Eloy Martinez-Heras; Loan Mattera; Igor Nestrasil; Kristin P O'Grady; Nico Papinutto; Daniel Papp; Deborah Pareto; Todd B Parrish; Anna Pichiecchio; Ferran Prados; Àlex Rovira; Marc J Ruitenberg; Rebecca S Samson; Giovanni Savini; Maryam Seif; Alan C Seifert; Alex K Smith; Seth A Smith; Zachary A Smith; Elisabeth Solana; Yuichi Suzuki; George Tackley; Alexandra Tinnermann; Jan Valošek; Dimitri Van De Ville; Marios C Yiannakas; Kenneth A Weber; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Richard G Wise; Patrik O Wyss; Junqian Xu Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2021-08-16 Impact factor: 17.021
Authors: Nico Papinutto; Regina Schlaeger; Valentina Panara; Eduardo Caverzasi; Sinyeob Ahn; Kevin J Johnson; Alyssa H Zhu; William A Stern; Gerhard Laub; Stephen L Hauser; Roland G Henry Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-12-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: S Shahrampour; B De Leener; M Alizadeh; D Middleton; L Krisa; A E Flanders; S H Faro; J Cohen-Adad; F B Mohamed Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 4.966
Authors: Nico Papinutto; Regina Schlaeger; Valentina Panara; Alyssa H Zhu; Eduardo Caverzasi; William A Stern; Stephen L Hauser; Roland G Henry Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Falk Eippert; Yazhuo Kong; Anderson M Winkler; Jesper L Andersson; Jürgen Finsterbusch; Christian Büchel; Jonathan C W Brooks; Irene Tracey Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-12-24 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Anna J E Combes; Lucy Matthews; Jimmy S Lee; David K B Li; Robert Carruthers; Anthony L Traboulsee; Gareth J Barker; Jacqueline Palace; Shannon Kolind Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 4.881