BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Because of their aggressiveness, brain tumors can lead to death within a short time after diagnosis. Optical techniques such as Raman spectroscopy may be a technique of choice for in situ tumor diagnosis, with potential use in determining tumor margins during surgery because of its ability to identify biochemical changes between normal and tumor brain tissues quickly and without tissue destruction. METHODS: In this work, fragments of brain tumor (glioblastoma, medulloblastoma, and meningioma) and normal tissues (cerebellum and meninges) were obtained from excisional intracranial surgery and from autopsies, respectively. Raman spectra (dispersive spectrometer, 830 nm 350 mW, 50 sec accumulation, total 172 spectra) were obtained in vitro on these fragments. It has been developed as a model to discriminate between the spectra of normal tissue and tumors based on the scores of principal component analysis (PCA) and Euclidean distance. RESULTS: ANOVA indicated that the scores of PC2 and PC3 show differences between normal and tumor groups (p<0.05) which could be employed in a discrimination model. PC2 was able to discriminate glioblastoma from the other tumors and from normal tissues, showing featured peaks of lipids/phospholipids and cholesterol. PC3 discriminated medulloblastoma and meningioma from normal tissues, with the most intense spectral features of proteins. PC3 also discriminated normal tissues (meninges and cerebellum) by the presence of cholesterol peaks. Results indicated a sensitivity and specificity of 97.4% and 100%, respectively, for this in vitro diagnosis of brain tumor. CONCLUSIONS: The PCA/Euclidean distance model was effective in differentiating tumor from normal spectra, regardless of the type of tissue (meninges or cerebellum).
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Because of their aggressiveness, brain tumors can lead to death within a short time after diagnosis. Optical techniques such as Raman spectroscopy may be a technique of choice for in situ tumor diagnosis, with potential use in determining tumor margins during surgery because of its ability to identify biochemical changes between normal and tumor brain tissues quickly and without tissue destruction. METHODS: In this work, fragments of brain tumor (glioblastoma, medulloblastoma, and meningioma) and normal tissues (cerebellum and meninges) were obtained from excisional intracranial surgery and from autopsies, respectively. Raman spectra (dispersive spectrometer, 830 nm 350 mW, 50 sec accumulation, total 172 spectra) were obtained in vitro on these fragments. It has been developed as a model to discriminate between the spectra of normal tissue and tumors based on the scores of principal component analysis (PCA) and Euclidean distance. RESULTS: ANOVA indicated that the scores of PC2 and PC3 show differences between normal and tumor groups (p<0.05) which could be employed in a discrimination model. PC2 was able to discriminate glioblastoma from the other tumors and from normal tissues, showing featured peaks of lipids/phospholipids and cholesterol. PC3 discriminated medulloblastoma and meningioma from normal tissues, with the most intense spectral features of proteins. PC3 also discriminated normal tissues (meninges and cerebellum) by the presence of cholesterol peaks. Results indicated a sensitivity and specificity of 97.4% and 100%, respectively, for this in vitro diagnosis of brain tumor. CONCLUSIONS: The PCA/Euclidean distance model was effective in differentiating tumor from normal spectra, regardless of the type of tissue (meninges or cerebellum).
Authors: Todd Hollon; Spencer Lewis; Christian W Freudiger; X Sunney Xie; Daniel A Orringer Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Damon DePaoli; Émile Lemoine; Katherine Ember; Martin Parent; Michel Prud'homme; Léo Cantin; Kevin Petrecca; Frédéric Leblond; Daniel C Côté Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Finn Jelke; Giulia Mirizzi; Felix Kleine Borgmann; Andreas Husch; Rédouane Slimani; Gilbert Georg Klamminger; Karoline Klein; Laurent Mombaerts; Jean-Jacques Gérardy; Michel Mittelbronn; Frank Hertel Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: M Kanmalar; Siti Fairus Abdul Sani; Nur Izzahtul Nabilla B Kamri; Nur Akmarina B M Said; Amirah Hajirah B A Jamil; S Kuppusamy; K S Mun; D A Bradley Journal: Cell Mol Biol Lett Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 5.787
Authors: Marco Riva; Tommaso Sciortino; Riccardo Secoli; Ester D'Amico; Sara Moccia; Bethania Fernandes; Marco Conti Nibali; Lorenzo Gay; Marco Rossi; Elena De Momi; Lorenzo Bello Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 6.639