PURPOSES: Heart rate characteristics monitoring for early detection of late-onset neonatal sepsis was first described in 2003. This technique, which uses mathematical methods to report the fold-increase in the risk of imminent neonatal sepsis, adds independent information to laboratory tests and clinical findings, and, in a large randomized trial, reduced NICU mortality of very low birth weight infants. Through re-analysis and new secondary analyses of published studies, we have systematically evaluated the utility of this new risk marker for screening the growing population of premature infants. METHODS: We followed the guidelines proposed by Hlatky et al. (Circulation, 119:2408-2416, 2009), reviewed past works, and re-analyzed data from 1,489 patients receiving conventional monitoring alone, 348 of whom had 488 episodes of proven sepsis, in the large randomized trial. RESULTS: Heart rate characteristics monitoring passed all phases of risk marker development from proof of concept to improvement of clinical outcomes. The predictiveness curve affirmed good calibration, and addition of the heart rate characteristics index to predictive models using standard risk factors favorably impacted the receiver operating characteristic curve area (increase of 0.030), continuous net reclassification index (0.389) and the integrated discrimination index (0.008), and compares well to other modern risk factors. CONCLUSION: Heart rate characteristics monitoring is a validated risk marker for sepsis in the NICU.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSES: Heart rate characteristics monitoring for early detection of late-onset neonatal sepsis was first described in 2003. This technique, which uses mathematical methods to report the fold-increase in the risk of imminent neonatal sepsis, adds independent information to laboratory tests and clinical findings, and, in a large randomized trial, reduced NICU mortality of very low birth weight infants. Through re-analysis and new secondary analyses of published studies, we have systematically evaluated the utility of this new risk marker for screening the growing population of premature infants. METHODS: We followed the guidelines proposed by Hlatky et al. (Circulation, 119:2408-2416, 2009), reviewed past works, and re-analyzed data from 1,489 patients receiving conventional monitoring alone, 348 of whom had 488 episodes of proven sepsis, in the large randomized trial. RESULTS: Heart rate characteristics monitoring passed all phases of risk marker development from proof of concept to improvement of clinical outcomes. The predictiveness curve affirmed good calibration, and addition of the heart rate characteristics index to predictive models using standard risk factors favorably impacted the receiver operating characteristic curve area (increase of 0.030), continuous net reclassification index (0.389) and the integrated discrimination index (0.008), and compares well to other modern risk factors. CONCLUSION: Heart rate characteristics monitoring is a validated risk marker for sepsis in the NICU.
Authors: Margaret S Pepe; Ziding Feng; Ying Huang; Gary Longton; Ross Prentice; Ian M Thompson; Yingye Zheng Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-11-02 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Karol M Pencina; A Cecile J W Janssens; Philip Greenland Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: J Randall Moorman; John B Delos; Abigail A Flower; Hanqing Cao; Boris P Kovatchev; Joshua S Richman; Douglas E Lake Journal: Physiol Meas Date: 2011-10-25 Impact factor: 2.833
Authors: Michael J Loguidice; Robert C Schutt; Jureta W Horton; Joseph P Minei; Ellen C Keeley Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2016 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.845
Authors: Rohit T Rao; Megerle L Scherholz; Clara Hartmanshenn; Seul-A Bae; Ioannis P Androulakis Journal: Comput Chem Eng Date: 2017-06-03 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Stephanie Helman; Martha Ann Terry; Tiffany Pellathy; Andrew Williams; Artur Dubrawski; Gilles Clermont; Michael R Pinsky; Salah Al-Zaiti; Marilyn Hravnak Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2021-11-11 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Fredrick J Bohanon; Amy A Mrazek; Mohamed T Shabana; Sarah Mims; Geetha L Radhakrishnan; George C Kramer; Ravi S Radhakrishnan Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Jessica Keim-Malpass; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Liza P Moorman; Matthew T Clark; Katy N Krahn; Oliver J Monfredi; Susan Hamil; Gholamreza Yousefvand; J Randall Moorman; Jamieson M Bourque Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2021-07-02
Authors: Mingju Cao; Marina Cortes; Craig S Moore; Soo Yuen Leong; Lucien D Durosier; Patrick Burns; Gilles Fecteau; Andre Desrochers; Roland N Auer; Luis B Barreiro; Jack P Antel; Martin G Frasch Journal: Front Cell Neurosci Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 5.505