Literature DB >> 24246825

The effect of donor age on penetrating keratoplasty for endothelial disease: graft survival after 10 years in the Cornea Donor Study.

Mark J Mannis1, Edward J Holland2, Robin L Gal3, Mariya Dontchev3, Craig Kollman3, Dan Raghinaru3, Steven P Dunn4, Robert L Schultze5, David D Verdier6, Jonathan H Lass7, Irving M Raber8, Joel Sugar9, Mark S Gorovoy10, Alan Sugar11, R Doyle Stulting12, Monty M Montoya13, Jeffrey G Penta14, Beth Ann Benetz7, Roy W Beck3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the 10-year success rate of penetrating keratoplasty for corneal endothelial disorders is associated with donor age.
DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, double-masked clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1090 participants undergoing penetrating keratoplasty at 80 sites for Fuchs' dystrophy (62%), pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema (34%), or another corneal endothelial disorder (4%) and followed for up to 12 years.
METHODS: Forty-three eye banks provided corneas from donors aged 12 to 75 years, using a randomized approach to assign donor corneas to study participants without respect to recipient factors. Surgery and postoperative care were performed according to the surgeons' usual routines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Graft failure defined as a regraft or, in the absence of a regraft, a cloudy cornea that was sufficiently opaque to compromise vision for 3 consecutive months.
RESULTS: In the primary analysis, the 10-year success rate was 77% for 707 corneas from donors aged 12 to 65 years compared with 71% for 383 donors aged 66 to 75 years (difference, +6%; 95% confidence interval, -1 to +12; P = 0.11). When analyzed as a continuous variable, higher donor age was associated with lower graft success beyond the first 5 years (P<0.001). Exploring this association further, we observed that the 10-year success rate was relatively constant for donors aged 34 to 71 years (75%). The success rate was higher for 80 donors aged 12 to 33 years (96%) and lower for 130 donors aged 72 to 75 years (62%). The relative decrease in the success rate with donor ages 72 to 75 years was not observed until after year 6.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary analysis did not show a significant difference in 10-year success rates comparing donor ages 12 to 65 years and 66 to 75 years, there was evidence of a donor age effect at the extremes of the age range. Because we observed a fairly constant 10-year success rate for donors aged 34 to 71 years, which account for approximately 75% of corneas in the United States available for transplant, the Cornea Donor Study results indicate that donor age is not an important factor in most penetrating keratoplasties for endothelial disease.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24246825      PMCID: PMC3885822          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  12 in total

Review 1.  Is donor age an important determinant of graft survival?

Authors:  R W Beck; R L Gal; M J Mannis; E J Holland; H D Cavanagh; G N Foulks; E L Heck; T Lindquist; M S Macsai; R E Smith; W J Stark; R D Stulting; J Sugar
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Clinical profile and early surgical complications in the Cornea Donor Study.

Authors:  Mark J Mannis; Edward J Holland; Roy W Beck; Michael W Belin; Marc A Goldberg; Robin L Gal; Andrea D Kalajian; Kenneth R Kenyon; Craig Kollman; Katrina J Ruedy; Patricia Smith; Joel Sugar; Walter J Stark
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  How effective is penetrating corneal transplantation? Factors influencing long-term outcome in multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Keryn A Williams; Adrian J Esterman; Christine Bartlett; Helene Holland; Ngaere B Hornsby; Douglas J Coster
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Baseline donor characteristics in the Cornea Donor Study.

Authors:  Alan Sugar; Robin L Gal; roy W Beck; Katrina J Ruedy; Christopher L Blanton; Robert S Feder; David R Hardten; Edward J Holland; Jonathan H Lass; Mark J Mannis; Michael B O'Keefe
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  An evaluation of image quality and accuracy of eye bank measurement of donor cornea endothelial cell density in the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study.

Authors:  Jonathan H Lass; Robin L Gal; Katrina J Ruedy; Beth Ann Benetz; Roy W Beck; Keith H Baratz; Edward J Holland; Andrea Kalajian; Craig Kollman; Francis J Manning; Mark J Mannis; Kristen McCoy; Monty Montoya; Doyle Stulting; Dongyuan Xing
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  The effect of donor age on corneal transplantation outcome results of the cornea donor study.

Authors:  Robin L gal; Mariya Dontchev; Roy W Beck; Mark J Mannis; Edward J Holland; Craig Kollman; Steven P Dunn; Ellen L Heck; Jonathan H Lass; Monty M Montoya; Robert L Schultze; R Doyle Stulting; Alan Sugar; Joel Sugar; Bradley Tennant; David D Verdier
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Risk factors for human corneal graft failure within the Australian corneal graft registry.

Authors:  Keryn A Williams; Marie Lowe; Christine Bartlett; Thu-Lan Kelly; Douglas J Coster
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  The collaborative corneal transplantation studies (CCTS). Effectiveness of histocompatibility matching in high-risk corneal transplantation. The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-10

9.  Donor age and factors related to endothelial cell loss 10 years after penetrating keratoplasty: Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study.

Authors:  Jonathan H Lass; Beth Ann Benetz; Robin L Gal; Craig Kollman; Dan Raghinaru; Mariya Dontchev; Mark J Mannis; Edward J Holland; Christopher Chow; Kristen McCoy; Francis W Price; Alan Sugar; David D Verdier; Roy W Beck
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Design and methods of The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies. The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.651

View more
  27 in total

1.  Vulnerability of corneal endothelial cells to mechanical trauma from indentation forces assessed using contact mechanics and fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Manuel A Ramirez-Garcia; Yousuf M Khalifa; Mark R Buckley
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 2.  [Influence of the donor age on graft survival : Is the demographic change also important for corneal tissue donation?]

Authors:  N Hofmann; M Derks; M Börgel; K Engelmann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Corneal graft rejection 10 years after penetrating keratoplasty in the cornea donor study.

Authors:  Steven P Dunn; Robin L Gal; Craig Kollman; Dan Raghinaru; Mariya Dontchev; Christopher L Blanton; Edward J Holland; Jonathan H Lass; Kenneth R Kenyon; Mark J Mannis; Shahzad I Mian; Christopher J Rapuano; Walter J Stark; Roy W Beck
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated with Graft Success in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Mark A Terry; Anthony J Aldave; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Wendi Liang; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Christopher Croasdale; Yassine J Daoud; Steven P Dunn; Caroline K Hoover; Marian S Macsai; Thomas F Mauger; Sudeep Pramanik; George O D Rosenwasser; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; R Doyle Stulting; Alan Sugar; Elmer Y Tu; David D Verdier; Sonia H Yoo; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty using corneas from elderly donors.

Authors:  Satoru Nakatani; Akira Murakami
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Effect of Graft Attachment Status and Intraocular Pressure on Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Outcomes in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Anthony J Aldave; Mark A Terry; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Wendi Liang; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Robert C O'Brien; Beth Ann Benetz; John E Bokosky; Steven P Dunn; Thomas E Gillette; Kristin M Hammersmith; David R Hardten; Bennie H Jeng; Marc F Jones; Richard L Lindstrom; Kenneth J Maverick; Verinder S Nirankari; Matthew S Oliva; Irving M Raber; Christopher J Rapuano; George O D Rosenwasser; Kevin W Ross; John W Seedor; Neda Shamie; Christopher G Stoeger; Shachar Tauber; Woodford S Van Meter; David D Verdier; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated With Increased Endothelial Cell Loss in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Jonathan H Lass; Beth Ann Benetz; Sanjay V Patel; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Robert O'Brien; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Yassine J Daoud; Mark A Greiner; Sadeer B Hannush; W Barry Lee; Thomas F Mauger; Harry J Menegay; Mark D Mifflin; Michael B Raizman; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; Robert L Schultze; Gregory A Schmidt; Alan Sugar; Mark A Terry; David D Verdier
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

8.  Penetrating Keratoplasty at a Tertiary Referral Center in Ethiopia: Indications and Outcomes.

Authors:  Menen Ayalew; Yonas Tilahun; Doug Holsclaw; Maanasa Indaram; Nicole E Stoller; Jeremy D Keenan; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Evolving Techniques in Corneal Transplantation.

Authors:  Grace E Boynton; Maria A Woodward
Journal:  Curr Surg Rep       Date:  2015-02-01

10.  Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty using corneas from elderly donors.

Authors:  Satoru Nakatani; Akira Murakami
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.