BACKGROUND: DNA aptamers represent a novel strategy in anti-cancer medicine. AS1411, a DNA aptamer targeting nucleolin (a protein which is overexpressed in many tumor types), was evaluated in patients with metastatic, clear-cell, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had failed treatment with ≥1 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor. METHODS: In this phase II, single-arm study, AS1411 was administered at 40 mg/kg/day by continuous intravenous infusion on days 1-4 of a 28-day cycle, for two cycles. Primary endpoint was overall response rate; progression-free survival (PFS) and safety were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: 35 patients were enrolled and treated. One patient (2.9 %) had a response to treatment. The response was dramatic (84 % reduction in tumor burden by RECIST 1.0 criteria) and durable (patient remains free of progression 2 years after completing therapy). Whole exome sequencing of this patient's tumor revealed missense mutations in the mTOR and FGFR2 genes which is of interest because nucleolin is known to upregulate mTOR pathway activity by enhancing AKT1 mRNA translation. No other responses were seen. Thirty-four percent of patients had an AS1411-related adverse event, all of which were mild or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: AS1411 appears to have minimal activity in unselected patients with metastatic RCC. However, rare, dramatic and durable responses can be observed and toxicity is low. One patient in this study had an excellent response and was found to have FGFR2 and mTOR mutations which will be of interest in future efforts to discover and validate predictive biomarkers of response to nucleolin targeted compounds. DNA aptamers represent a novel way to target cancer cells at a molecular level and continue to be developed with a view to improving treatment and imaging in cancer medicine.
BACKGROUND: DNA aptamers represent a novel strategy in anti-cancer medicine. AS1411, a DNA aptamer targeting nucleolin (a protein which is overexpressed in many tumor types), was evaluated in patients with metastatic, clear-cell, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had failed treatment with ≥1 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor. METHODS: In this phase II, single-arm study, AS1411 was administered at 40 mg/kg/day by continuous intravenous infusion on days 1-4 of a 28-day cycle, for two cycles. Primary endpoint was overall response rate; progression-free survival (PFS) and safety were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: 35 patients were enrolled and treated. One patient (2.9 %) had a response to treatment. The response was dramatic (84 % reduction in tumor burden by RECIST 1.0 criteria) and durable (patient remains free of progression 2 years after completing therapy). Whole exome sequencing of this patient's tumor revealed missense mutations in the mTOR and FGFR2 genes which is of interest because nucleolin is known to upregulate mTOR pathway activity by enhancing AKT1 mRNA translation. No other responses were seen. Thirty-four percent of patients had an AS1411-related adverse event, all of which were mild or moderate. CONCLUSIONS:AS1411 appears to have minimal activity in unselected patients with metastatic RCC. However, rare, dramatic and durable responses can be observed and toxicity is low. One patient in this study had an excellent response and was found to have FGFR2 and mTOR mutations which will be of interest in future efforts to discover and validate predictive biomarkers of response to nucleolin targeted compounds. DNA aptamers represent a novel way to target cancer cells at a molecular level and continue to be developed with a view to improving treatment and imaging in cancer medicine.
Authors: Paul B Chapman; Axel Hauschild; Caroline Robert; John B Haanen; Paolo Ascierto; James Larkin; Reinhard Dummer; Claus Garbe; Alessandro Testori; Michele Maio; David Hogg; Paul Lorigan; Celeste Lebbe; Thomas Jouary; Dirk Schadendorf; Antoni Ribas; Steven J O'Day; Jeffrey A Sosman; John M Kirkwood; Alexander M M Eggermont; Brigitte Dreno; Keith Nolop; Jiang Li; Betty Nelson; Jeannie Hou; Richard J Lee; Keith T Flaherty; Grant A McArthur Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eunice L Kwak; Yung-Jue Bang; D Ross Camidge; Alice T Shaw; Benjamin Solomon; Robert G Maki; Sai-Hong I Ou; Bruce J Dezube; Pasi A Jänne; Daniel B Costa; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Woo-Ho Kim; Thomas J Lynch; Panos Fidias; Hannah Stubbs; Jeffrey A Engelman; Lecia V Sequist; WeiWei Tan; Leena Gandhi; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Greg C Wei; S Martin Shreeve; Mark J Ratain; Jeffrey Settleman; James G Christensen; Daniel A Haber; Keith Wilner; Ravi Salgia; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Jeffrey W Clark; A John Iafrate Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ara G Hovanessian; Calaiselvy Soundaramourty; Diala El Khoury; Isabelle Nondier; Josette Svab; Bernard Krust Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Shahid M Nimjee; Rebekah R White; Richard C Becker; Bruce A Sullenger Journal: Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 13.820
Authors: Lingegowda S Mangala; Hongyu Wang; Dahai Jiang; Sherry Y Wu; Anoma Somasunderam; David E Volk; Ganesh L R Lokesh; Xin Li; Sunila Pradeep; Xianbin Yang; Monika Haemmerle; Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo; Archana S Nagaraja; Rajesha Rupaimoole; Emine Bayraktar; Recep Bayraktar; Li Li; Takemi Tanaka; Wei Hu; Cristina Ivan; Kshipra M Gharpure; Michael H McGuire; Varatharasa Thiviyanathan; Xinna Zhang; Sourindra N Maiti; Nataliya Bulayeva; Hyun-Jin Choi; Piotr L Dorniak; Laurence Jn Cooper; Kevin P Rosenblatt; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; David G Gorenstein; Anil K Sood Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-10-20
Authors: E Merit Reyes-Reyes; Francesca R Šalipur; Mitra Shams; Matthew K Forsthoefel; Paula J Bates Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Alicia K Byrd; Boris L Zybailov; Leena Maddukuri; Jun Gao; John C Marecki; Mihir Jaiswal; Matthew R Bell; Wezley C Griffin; Megan R Reed; Shubeena Chib; Samuel G Mackintosh; Angus M MacNicol; Giulia Baldini; Robert L Eoff; Kevin D Raney Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 5.157