Literature DB >> 1835162

Disability exaggeration as a predictor of functional restoration outcomes for patients with chronic low-back pain.

R G Hazard1, A Bendix, J W Fenwick.   

Abstract

Many of the individual biological, psychological, and social factors attributed to low-back disability have been tested previously for their ability to predict treatment outcomes. To test the assumption that disability exaggeration affects treatment outcomes, models were developed to quantify this complex characteristic and to test its predictive value. Two hundred fifty-eight patients with chronic back disability entering a program of functional restoration were initially evaluated with a battery of tests, including measurements of trunk flexibility, lifting capacity, cycling endurance, self-assessments of pain and disability, and psychological attributes. On the basis of these measurements, patients were characterized as disability exaggerators if by peer comparison their self-assessments of pain and disability were in the most severe range despite high levels of physical capacity. Program completion and work status 1 and 2 years after treatment were compared between disability exaggerators and their peers. Individual initial attributes associated with program completion included pain intensity and Million Visual Analogue scores, lifting capacity, trunk flexibility, some Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and Million Behavioral Health Inventory scales, and cigarette smoking. One-year re-employment was associated with Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Scale 8, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Score-Revised, and cycling endurance. There were no significant associations between any individual factor and 2-year work status. Only two of the 12 disability exaggeration models distinguished between program graduates and dropouts, and none of the models accurately predicted return to work following treatment. Prescription of intensive multidisciplinary treatment should not be denied on the basis of any individual patient attribute or of disability exaggeration, as measured in this study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1835162     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199109000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  Differences among outcome measures in occupational low back pain.

Authors:  Sue A Ferguson; William S Marras; Deborah L Burr
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

2.  Social labeling, stereotyping, and observer bias in workers' compensation: The impact of provider-patient interaction on outcome.

Authors:  L O Niemeyer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1991-12

3.  Responsiveness of depression and its influence on surgical outcomes of lumbar degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Asdrubal Falavigna; Orlando Righesso; Alisson Roberto Teles; Lucas Piccoli Conzati; Julia Bertholdo Bossardi; Pedro Guarise da Silva; Joseph S Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-05-22

Review 4.  Formal education and back pain: a review.

Authors:  C E Dionne; M Von Korff; T D Koepsell; R A Deyo; W E Barlow; H Checkoway
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Translation, adaptation and validation of the Moroccan version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.

Authors:  Imad Bendeddouche; Samira Rostom; Rachid Bahiri; Aziza Boudali; Najlaa Srifi; Nada Mawani; Mariam Mengat; Dalal El Badri; Noufissa Lazrak; Redouane Abouqal; Fadoua Allali; Najia Hajjaj-Hassouni
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Lumbar disc herniation: social and demographic factors determining duration of disease.

Authors:  C Rasmussen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  [Lifting capacity with low back pain : Discrepancy between self-rated and real lifting capacity in patients with back pain and pain-free controls].

Authors:  M Pfingsten; A Wendt; B Kröner-Herwig; S Lüder; J Hildebrandt; F Petzke
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  Comparison of the oswestry disability index and magnetic resonance imaging findings in lumbar canal stenosis: an observational study.

Authors:  Vijay G Goni; Aravind Hampannavar; Nirmal Raj Gopinathan; Paramjeet Singh; Pebam Sudesh; Rajesh Kumar Logithasan; Anurag Sharma; Shashidhar Bk; Radheshyam Sament
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-02-06

9.  [Multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic low back pain, part 2. Somatic aspects].

Authors:  P Saur; J Hildebrandt; M Pfingsten; D Seeger; U Steinmetz; A Straub; J Hahn; B Kasi; R Heinemann; D Koch
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1996-10-28       Impact factor: 1.107

10.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation with Oswestry Disability Index and MR imaging.

Authors:  Mustafa Sirvanci; Mona Bhatia; Kursat Ali Ganiyusufoglu; Cihan Duran; Mehmet Tezer; Cagatay Ozturk; Mehmet Aydogan; Azmi Hamzaoglu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.