Literature DB >> 24242244

Analysis of the gull fecal microbial community reveals the dominance of Catellicoccus marimammalium in relation to culturable Enterococci.

Amber M Koskey1, Jenny C Fisher, Mary F Traudt, Ryan J Newton, Sandra L McLellan.   

Abstract

Gulls are prevalent in beach environments and can be a major source of fecal contamination. Gulls have been shown to harbor a high abundance of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB), such as Escherichia coli and enterococci, which can be readily detected as part of routine beach monitoring. Despite the ubiquitous presence of gull fecal material in beach environments, the associated microbial community is relatively poorly characterized. We generated comprehensive microbial community profiles of gull fecal samples using Roche 454 and Illumina MiSeq platforms to investigate the composition and variability of the gull fecal microbial community and to measure the proportion of FIB. Enterococcaceae and Enterobacteriaceae were the two most abundant families in our gull samples. Sequence comparisons between short-read data and nearly full-length 16S rRNA gene clones generated from the same samples revealed Catellicoccus marimammalium as the most numerous taxon among all samples. The identification of bacteria from gull fecal pellets cultured on membrane-Enterococcus indoxyl-β-D-glucoside (mEI) plates showed that the dominant sequences recovered in our sequence libraries did not represent organisms culturable on mEI. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of gull fecal isolates cultured on mEI plates, 98.8% were identified as Enterococcus spp., 1.2% were identified as Streptococcus spp., and none were identified as C. marimammalium. Illumina deep sequencing indicated that gull fecal samples harbor significantly higher proportions of C. marimammalium 16S rRNA gene sequences (>50-fold) relative to typical mEI culturable Enterococcus spp. C. marimammalium therefore can be confidently utilized as a genetic marker to identify gull fecal pollution in the beach environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24242244      PMCID: PMC3911088          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02414-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  37 in total

1.  Egg oiling to reduce hatch-year ring-billed gull numbers on Chicago's beaches during swim season and water quality test results.

Authors:  Richard M Engeman; John W Hartmann; Scott F Beckerman; Thomas W Seamans; Sarah Abu-Absi
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.184

2.  A detailed analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene segments for the diagnosis of pathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  Soumitesh Chakravorty; Danica Helb; Michele Burday; Nancy Connell; David Alland
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Bacteroidales diversity in ring-billed gulls (Laurus delawarensis) residing at Lake Michigan beaches.

Authors:  Sonja N Jeter; Colleen M McDermott; Patricia A Bower; Julie L Kinzelman; Melinda J Bootsma; Giles W Goetz; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Assessing pathogen risk to swimmers at non-sewage impacted recreational beaches.

Authors:  Mary E Schoen; Nicholas J Ashbolt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Molecular detection of Campylobacter spp. in California gull (Larus californicus) excreta.

Authors:  Jingrang Lu; Hodon Ryu; Jorge W Santo Domingo; John F Griffith; Nicholas Ashbolt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Comparison of gull feces-specific assays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of Catellicoccus marimammalium and Streptococcus spp.

Authors:  Hodon Ryu; John F Griffith; Izhar U H Khan; Stephen Hill; Thomas A Edge; Carlos Toledo-Hernandez; Joel Gonzalez-Nieves; Jorge Santo Domingo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Escherichia coli concentrations in feces of geese, coots, and gulls residing on recreational water in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Bastiaan G Meerburg; Miriam G J Koene; David Kleijn
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.133

8.  Enterococcus species distribution among human and animal hosts using multiplex PCR.

Authors:  B A Layton; S P Walters; L H Lam; A B Boehm
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Phylogenetic diversity and molecular detection of bacteria in gull feces.

Authors:  Jingrang Lu; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Regina Lamendella; Thomas Edge; Stephen Hill
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Development of quantitative PCR assays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of Enterococcus spp. and their application to the identification of enterococcus species in environmental samples.

Authors:  Hodon Ryu; Michael Henson; Michael Elk; Carlos Toledo-Hernandez; John Griffith; Denene Blackwood; Rachel Noble; Michèle Gourmelon; Susan Glassmeyer; Jorge W Santo Domingo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  12 in total

1.  Blautia and Prevotella sequences distinguish human and animal fecal pollution in Brazil surface waters.

Authors:  Amber M Koskey; Jenny C Fisher; A Murat Eren; Rafael Ponce-Terashima; Mitermayer G Reis; Ronald E Blanton; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.541

2.  Influence of Land Use, Nutrients, and Geography on Microbial Communities and Fecal Indicator Abundance at Lake Michigan Beaches.

Authors:  Danielle D Cloutier; Elizabeth W Alm; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Identification of Specialists and Abundance-Occupancy Relationships among Intestinal Bacteria of Aves, Mammalia, and Actinopterygii.

Authors:  Hyatt C Green; Jenny C Fisher; Sandra L McLellan; Mitchell L Sogin; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Gut microbiome and telomere length in gull hatchlings.

Authors:  Alberto Velando; Jose Carlos Noguera; Manuel Aira; Jorge Domínguez
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.812

5.  Distribution and Differential Survival of Traditional and Alternative Indicators of Fecal Pollution at Freshwater Beaches.

Authors:  Danielle D Cloutier; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Discovering new indicators of fecal pollution.

Authors:  Sandra L McLellan; A Murat Eren
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 17.079

7.  Phasing amplicon sequencing on Illumina Miseq for robust environmental microbial community analysis.

Authors:  Liyou Wu; Chongqing Wen; Yujia Qin; Huaqun Yin; Qichao Tu; Joy D Van Nostrand; Tong Yuan; Menting Yuan; Ye Deng; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  Comparative Analysis of Intestine Microbiota of Four Wild Waterbird Species.

Authors:  Sivan Laviad-Shitrit; Ido Izhaki; Maya Lalzar; Malka Halpern
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Gut microbiome is affected by inter-sexual and inter-seasonal variation in diet for thick-billed murres (Uria lomvia).

Authors:  Esteban Góngora; Kyle H Elliott; Lyle Whyte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparative Analysis of the Fecal Bacterial Microbiota of Wintering Whooper Swans (Cygnus Cygnus).

Authors:  Wenxia Wang; Songlin Huang; Liangliang Yang; Guogang Zhang
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.