Literature DB >> 23087032

Development of quantitative PCR assays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of Enterococcus spp. and their application to the identification of enterococcus species in environmental samples.

Hodon Ryu1, Michael Henson, Michael Elk, Carlos Toledo-Hernandez, John Griffith, Denene Blackwood, Rachel Noble, Michèle Gourmelon, Susan Glassmeyer, Jorge W Santo Domingo.   

Abstract

The detection of environmental enterococci has been determined primarily by using culture-based techniques that might exclude some enterococcal species as well as those that are nonculturable. To address this, the relative abundances of enterococci were examined by challenging fecal and water samples against a currently available genus-specific assay (Entero1). To determine the diversity of enterococcal species, 16S rRNA gene-based group-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays were developed and evaluated against eight of the most common environmental enterococcal species. Partial 16S rRNA gene sequences of 439 presumptive environmental enterococcal strains were analyzed to study further the diversity of enterococci and to confirm the specificities of group-specific assays. The group-specific qPCR assays showed relatively high amplification rates with targeted species (>98%), although some assays cross-amplified with nontargeted species (1.3 to 6.5%). The results with the group-specific assays also showed that different enterococcal species co-occurred in most fecal samples. The most abundant enterococci in water and fecal samples were Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, although we identified more water isolates as Enterococcus casseliflavus than as any of the other species. The prevalence of the Entero1 marker was in agreement with the combined number of positive signals determined by the group-specific assays in most fecal samples, except in gull feces. On the other hand, the number of group-specific assay signals was lower in all water samples tested, suggesting that other enterococcal species are present in these samples. While the results highlight the value of genus- and group-specific assays for detecting the major enterococcal groups in environmental water samples, additional studies are needed to determine further the diversity, distributions, and relative abundances of all enterococcal species found in water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23087032      PMCID: PMC3536114          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02802-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  41 in total

1.  How quantitative is quantitative PCR with respect to cell counts?

Authors:  W Ludwig; K H Schleifer
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  Antibiotic resistance patterns of enterococci isolated from coastal bathing waters.

Authors:  M Arvanitidou; V Katsouyannopoulos; A Tsakris
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Characterization of sewage waters by biochemical fingerprinting of Enterococci.

Authors:  Albert Manero; Xavier Vilanova; Marta Cerdà-Cuéllar; Anicet R Blanch
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Application of the fluorogenic probe technique (TaqMan PCR) to the detection of Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli in water samples.

Authors:  Edith Frahm; Ursula Obst
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.363

5.  Identification of plant-associated enterococci.

Authors:  T Müller; A Ulrich; E M Ott; M Müller
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.772

6.  The genetic structure of Escherichia coli populations in primary and secondary habitats.

Authors:  David M Gordon; Sonja Bauer; James R Johnson
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.777

7.  Enterococcus haemoperoxidus sp. nov. and Enterococcus moraviensis sp. nov., isolated from water.

Authors:  P Svec; L A Devriese; I Sedlácek; M Baele; M Vancanneyt; F Haesebrouck; J Swings; J Doskar
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Resuscitation rate in different enterococcal species in the viable but non-culturable state.

Authors:  M M Lleò; B Bonato; M C Tafi; C Signoretto; M Boaretti; P Canepari
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Potential of Enterococcus faecalis as a human fecal indicator for microbial source tracking.

Authors:  Andrea L Wheeler; Peter G Hartel; Dominique G Godfrey; Jennifer L Hill; William I Segars
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.751

10.  Real-time PCR method to detect Enterococcus faecalis in water.

Authors:  Jorge W Santo Domingo; Shawn C Siefring; Richard A Haugland
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.461

View more
  27 in total

1.  Distribution of human-specific bacteroidales and fecal indicator bacteria in an urban watershed impacted by sewage pollution, determined using RNA- and DNA-based quantitative PCR assays.

Authors:  Vikram Kapoor; Tarja Pitkänen; Hodon Ryu; Michael Elk; David Wendell; Jorge W Santo Domingo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Tracking the primary sources of fecal pollution in a tropical watershed in a one-year study.

Authors:  Carlos Toledo-Hernandez; Hodon Ryu; Joel Gonzalez-Nieves; Evelyn Huertas; Gary A Toranzos; Jorge W Santo Domingo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Intestinal microbiota and species diversity of Campylobacter and Helicobacter spp. in migrating shorebirds in Delaware Bay.

Authors:  Hodon Ryu; Kirsten Grond; Bram Verheijen; Michael Elk; Deborah M Buehler; Jorge W Santo Domingo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Biofilms on Hospital Shower Hoses: Characterization and Implications for Nosocomial Infections.

Authors:  Maria J Soto-Giron; Luis M Rodriguez-R; Chengwei Luo; Michael Elk; Hodon Ryu; Jill Hoelle; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Konstantinos T Konstantinidis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Chronic liver disease enables gut Enterococcus faecalis colonization to promote liver carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Noriho Iida; Eishiro Mizukoshi; Tatsuya Yamashita; Masahiro Yutani; Jun Seishima; Ziyu Wang; Kuniaki Arai; Hikari Okada; Taro Yamashita; Yoshio Sakai; Yusuke Masuo; Rina Agustina; Yukio Kato; Yukako Fujinaga; Masanobu Oshima; Masao Honda; François Lebreton; Michael S Gilmore; Shuichi Kaneko
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2021-09-27

6.  Analysis of the gull fecal microbial community reveals the dominance of Catellicoccus marimammalium in relation to culturable Enterococci.

Authors:  Amber M Koskey; Jenny C Fisher; Mary F Traudt; Ryan J Newton; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Propidium monoazide-polymerase chain reaction for detection of residual periprosthetic joint infection in two-stage revision.

Authors:  Mohamed Askar; Mariam Sajid; Yassar Nassif; Waheed Ashraf; Brigitte Scammell; Roger Bayston
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-10-05       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  Cyprus Sausages' Bacterial Community Identification Through Metataxonomic Sequencing: Evaluation of the Impact of Different DNA Extraction Protocols on the Sausages' Microbial Diversity Representation.

Authors:  Eleni Kamilari; Marina Efthymiou; Dimitrios A Anagnostopoulos; Dimitrios Tsaltas
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Comparative stability of assay results of enterococci measured by culture and qPCR over time in bathing beach waters.

Authors:  Larry J Wymer; Timothy J Wade; Elizabeth Sams; Kevin Oshima; Alfred P Dufour
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Highlighting the promise of qPCR-based environmental monitoring: response of the ribosomal RNA:DNA ratio of calanoid copepods to toxic cyanobacteria.

Authors:  Aabir Banerji; Ruta Deshpande; Michael Elk; Jody A Shoemaker; Dan R Tettenhorst; Mark Bagley; Jorge W Santo Domingo
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.935

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.