Literature DB >> 24242239

The fitness advantage of commercial wine yeasts in relation to the nitrogen concentration, temperature, and ethanol content under microvinification conditions.

Estéfani García-Ríos1, Alicia Gutiérrez, Zoel Salvadó, Francisco Noé Arroyo-López, José Manuel Guillamon.   

Abstract

The effect of the main environmental factors governing wine fermentation on the fitness of industrial yeast strains has barely received attention. In this study, we used the concept of fitness advantage to measure how increasing nitrogen concentrations (0 to 200 mg N/liter), ethanol (0 to 20%), and temperature (4 to 45°C) affects competition among four commercial wine yeast strains (PDM, ARM, RVA, and TTA). We used a mathematical approach to model the hypothetical time needed for the control strain (PDM) to out-compete the other three strains in a theoretical mixed population. The theoretical values obtained were subsequently verified by competitive mixed fermentations in both synthetic and natural musts, which showed a good fit between the theoretical and experimental data. Specifically, the data show that the increase in nitrogen concentration and temperature values improved the fitness advantage of the PDM strain, whereas the presence of ethanol significantly reduced its competitiveness. However, the RVA strain proved to be the most competitive yeast for the three enological parameters assayed. The study of the fitness of these industrial strains is of paramount interest for the wine industry, which uses them as starters of their fermentations. Here, we propose a very simple method to model the fitness advantage, which allows the prediction of the competitiveness of one strain with respect to different abiotic factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24242239      PMCID: PMC3911103          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03405-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  22 in total

1.  Stationary-phase gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation.

Authors:  C Riou; J M Nicaud; P Barre; C Gaillardin
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.239

2.  Modeling of the bacterial growth curve.

Authors:  M H Zwietering; I Jongenburger; F M Rombouts; K van 't Riet
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Effect of fermentation temperature and culture media on the yeast lipid composition and wine volatile compounds.

Authors:  Gemma Beltran; Maite Novo; José M Guillamón; Albert Mas; Nicolas Rozès
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 5.277

4.  Quantifying the individual effects of ethanol and temperature on the fitness advantage of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Z Salvadó; F N Arroyo-López; E Barrio; A Querol; J M Guillamón
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.516

5.  Yeast population dynamics in spontaneous fermentations: comparison between two different wine-producing areas over a period of three years.

Authors:  M J Torija; N Rozès; M Poblet; J M Guillamón; A Mas
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.271

6.  Influence of temperature and pH on Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum growth; impact of a wine yeast interspecific hybridization on these parameters.

Authors:  Audrey Serra; Pierre Strehaiano; Patricia Taillandier
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 5.277

7.  Molecular characterization of new natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. kudriavzevii in brewing.

Authors:  Sara S González; Eladio Barrio; Amparo Querol
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Analysis of yeast populations during alcoholic fermentation: a six year follow-up study.

Authors:  Gemma Beltran; Maria Jesús Torija; Maite Novo; Noemi Ferrer; Montserrat Poblet; José M Guillamón; Nicolas Rozès; Albert Mas
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.022

9.  Quantifying the complexities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae's ecosystem engineering via fermentation.

Authors:  Matthew R Goddard
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pan-genome reveals a pool of copy number variants distributed in diverse yeast strains from differing industrial environments.

Authors:  Barbara Dunn; Chandra Richter; Daniel J Kvitek; Tom Pugh; Gavin Sherlock
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effect of Temperature on the Prevalence of Saccharomyces Non cerevisiae Species against a S. cerevisiae Wine Strain in Wine Fermentation: Competition, Physiological Fitness, and Influence in Final Wine Composition.

Authors:  Javier Alonso-Del-Real; María Lairón-Peris; Eladio Barrio; Amparo Querol
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Investigations of the mechanisms of interactions between four non-conventional species with Saccharomyces cerevisiae in oenological conditions.

Authors:  Oliver Harlé; Judith Legrand; Catherine Tesnière; Martine Pradal; Jean-Roch Mouret; Thibault Nidelet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Quantifying the Effects of Ethanol and Temperature on the Fitness Advantage of Predominant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains Occurring in Spontaneous Wine Fermentations.

Authors:  Donatella Ganucci; Simona Guerrini; Silvia Mangani; Massimo Vincenzini; Lisa Granchi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Segregating Complete Tf2 Elements Are Largely Neutral in Fission Yeast.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Qin Wang; Zhiwei Wu; Guan-Zhu Han
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 5.  Yeast Interactions in Inoculated Wine Fermentation.

Authors:  Maurizio Ciani; Angela Capece; Francesca Comitini; Laura Canonico; Gabriella Siesto; Patrizia Romano
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  The Genetics of Non-conventional Wine Yeasts: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede; Marina Bely; Philippe Marullo; Warren Albertin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Nitrogen Preferences during Alcoholic Fermentation of Different Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts of Oenological Interest.

Authors:  Helena Roca-Mesa; Sonia Sendra; Albert Mas; Gemma Beltran; María-Jesús Torija
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-01-22

8.  Ecological interactions are a primary driver of population dynamics in wine yeast microbiota during fermentation.

Authors:  Bahareh Bagheri; Florian Franz Bauer; Gianluigi Cardinali; Mathabatha Evodia Setati
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.