Literature DB >> 21645814

Quantifying the individual effects of ethanol and temperature on the fitness advantage of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Z Salvadó1, F N Arroyo-López, E Barrio, A Querol, J M Guillamón.   

Abstract

The presence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in grape berries and fresh musts is usually very low. However, as fermentation progresses, the population levels of this species considerably increase. In this study, we use the concept of fitness advantage to measure how increasing ethanol concentrations (0-25%) and temperature values (4-46 °C) in wine fermentations affects competition between S. cerevisiae and several non-Saccharomyces yeasts (Hanseniaspora uvarum, Torulaspora delbrueckii, Candida zemplinina, Pichia fermentans and Kluyveromyces marxianus). We used a mathematical approach to model the hypothetical time needed for S. cerevisiae to impose itself on a mixed population of the non-Saccharomyces species described above. This approach also took into consideration the influence of environmental factors and the initial population levels of S. cerevisiae (0.1, 1.0 and 10.0%). Our results suggest that Saccharomyces niche construction via ethanol production does not provide a clear ecological advantage (at least not until the ethanol concentration exceeds 9%), whereas a temperature rise (above 15 °C) does give S. cerevisiae a considerable advantage. The initial frequency of S. cerevisiae considerably influences the time it needs to impose itself (until it reaches a final frequency of 99% in the mixed culture), the lowest time values being found at the highest initial frequency. In light of these results, the application of low temperatures in the wine industry could favor the growth and survival of non-Saccharomyces species for a longer period of time.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21645814     DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2011.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0740-0020            Impact factor:   5.516


  20 in total

1.  Fermentation innovation through complex hybridization of wild and domesticated yeasts.

Authors:  Quinn K Langdon; David Peris; EmilyClare P Baker; Dana A Opulente; Huu-Vang Nguyen; Ursula Bond; Paula Gonçalves; José Paulo Sampaio; Diego Libkind; Chris Todd Hittinger
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 15.460

2.  Lipid Composition Analysis Reveals Mechanisms of Ethanol Tolerance in the Model Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M Lairón-Peris; S J Routledge; J A Linney; J Alonso-Del-Real; C M Spickett; A R Pitt; J M Guillamón; E Barrio; A D Goddard; A Querol
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Substrate, temperature, and geographical patterns among nearly 2000 natural yeast isolates.

Authors:  William J Spurley; Kaitlin J Fisher; Quinn K Langdon; Kelly V Buh; Martin Jarzyna; Max A B Haase; Kayla Sylvester; Ryan V Moriarty; Daniel Rodriguez; Angela Sheddan; Sarah Wright; Lisa Sorlie; Amanda Beth Hulfachor; Dana A Opulente; Chris Todd Hittinger
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.239

4.  The fitness advantage of commercial wine yeasts in relation to the nitrogen concentration, temperature, and ethanol content under microvinification conditions.

Authors:  Estéfani García-Ríos; Alicia Gutiérrez; Zoel Salvadó; Francisco Noé Arroyo-López; José Manuel Guillamon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Global phenotypic and genomic comparison of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains reveals a novel role of the sulfur assimilation pathway in adaptation at low temperature fermentations.

Authors:  Estéfani García-Ríos; María López-Malo; José Manuel Guillamón
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Evolution of ecological dominance of yeast species in high-sugar environments.

Authors:  Kathryn M Williams; Ping Liu; Justin C Fay
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Effect of Temperature on the Prevalence of Saccharomyces Non cerevisiae Species against a S. cerevisiae Wine Strain in Wine Fermentation: Competition, Physiological Fitness, and Influence in Final Wine Composition.

Authors:  Javier Alonso-Del-Real; María Lairón-Peris; Eladio Barrio; Amparo Querol
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Yeast Monitoring of Wine Mixed or Sequential Fermentations Made by Native Strains from D.O. "Vinos de Madrid" Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Margarita García; Braulio Esteve-Zarzoso; Julia Crespo; Juan M Cabellos; Teresa Arroyo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Comparative genomics among Saccharomyces cerevisiae × Saccharomyces kudriavzevii natural hybrid strains isolated from wine and beer reveals different origins.

Authors:  David Peris; Christian A Lopes; Carmela Belloch; Amparo Querol; Eladio Barrio
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  The Genetics of Non-conventional Wine Yeasts: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede; Marina Bely; Philippe Marullo; Warren Albertin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.