Literature DB >> 24241646

Public participation and volunteer help in monitoring programs: An assessment.

P Stokes1, M Havas, T Brydges.   

Abstract

A number of opportunities exist for involving the public in environmental monitoring. This paper outlines some examples where this has been done, evaluates these examples, and then summarizes some of the benefits as well as the disadvantages of this approach.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 24241646     DOI: 10.1007/BF00394889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  1 in total

1.  Heavy metals and essential elements in livers of the polar bear (Ursus maritimus) in the Canadian Arctic.

Authors:  R J Norstrom; R E Schweinsberg; B T Collins
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 7.963

  1 in total
  7 in total

1.  Establishing the Canadian Community Monitoring Network.

Authors:  Graham Whitelaw; Hague Vaughan; Brian Craig; David Atkinson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities.

Authors:  Cathy C Conrad; Krista G Hilchey
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Issues in monitoring wilderness lake chemistry: A case study in the Sawtooth Mountains, Idaho.

Authors:  F A Vertucci; J M Eilers
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Can volunteers collect data that are comparable to professional scientists? A study of variables used in monitoring the outcomes of ecosystem rehabilitation.

Authors:  John Gollan; Lisa Lobry de Bruyn; Nick Reid; Lance Wilkie
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Using public participation to sample trace metals in lake surface sediments: the OPAL Metals Survey.

Authors:  S D Turner; N L Rose; B Goldsmith; J M Bearcock; C Scheib; H Yang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Process, not product: investigating recommendations for improving citizen science "success".

Authors:  Amy Freitag; Max J Pfeffer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Quality control in public participation assessments of water quality: the OPAL Water Survey.

Authors:  N L Rose; S D Turner; B Goldsmith; L Gosling; T A Davidson
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.964

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.