| Literature DB >> 24238640 |
Judith Neukirchen1, Michael Lauseker2, Sabine Blum3, Aristoteles Giagounidis4, Michael Lübbert5, Samuela Martino6, Sergio Siragusa6, Richard F Schlenk7, Uwe Platzbecker8, Wolf-Karsten Hofmann9, Katharina Götze10, Giuseppe A Palumbo11, Silvana Magrin12, Andrea Kündgen13, Carlo Aul4, Barbara Hildebrandt14, Joerg Hasford2, Guido Kobbe13, Rainer Haas13, Ulrich Germing13.
Abstract
The revised IPSS (IPSS-R) was developed aiming at a better prognostication, taking into account patients treated with best supportive care. We herein validated this model on the basis of data from 1314 patients who received BSC only as well as patients who underwent induction chemotherapy (n=214) or allogeneic transplantation (n=167). We could demonstrate a clear distinction of the IPSS-R risk categories with regard to survival and risk of AML evolution in all patient cohorts. When comparing IPSS-R, IPSS, WHO prognostic scoring system (WPSS) and Duesseldorf score, the best results regarding the ability to predict survival were obtained by the IPSS-R.Entities:
Keywords: IPSS; IPSS-R; MDS; Prognosis; Survival; WPSS
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24238640 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.10.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leuk Res ISSN: 0145-2126 Impact factor: 3.156