Literature DB >> 28497239

Validation of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome in Japan: results from a prospective multicenter registry.

Hiroshi Kawabata1,2, Kaoru Tohyama3, Akira Matsuda4, Kayano Araseki5, Tomoko Hata6, Takahiro Suzuki7,8, Hidekazu Kayano9, Kei Shimbo10, Yuji Zaike11, Kensuke Usuki12, Shigeru Chiba13, Takayuki Ishikawa14, Nobuyoshi Arima15, Masaharu Nogawa16, Akiko Ohta17, Yasushi Miyazaki6, Kinuko Mitani18, Keiya Ozawa7,19, Shunya Arai20, Mineo Kurokawa20, Akifumi Takaori-Kondo21.   

Abstract

The Japanese National Research Group on Idiopathic Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes has been conducting prospective registration, central review, and follow-up study for patients with aplastic anemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) since 2006. Using this database, we retrospectively analyzed the prognosis of patients with MDS. As of May 2016, 351 cases were registered in this database, 186 of which were eligible for the present study. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that overall survival (OS) curves of the five risk categories stipulated by the revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) were reasonably separated. 2-year OS rates for the very low-, low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk categories were 95, 89, 79, 35, and 12%, respectively. In the same categories, incidence of leukemic transformation at 2 years was 0, 10, 8, 56, and 40%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex, low platelet counts, increased blast percentage (>2%), and high-risk karyotype abnormalities were independent risk factors for poor OS. Based on these data, we classified Japanese MDS patients who were classified as intermediate-risk in IPSS-R, into the lower risk MDS category, highlighting the need for careful assessment of treatments within low- and high-risk treatment protocols.

Entities:  

Keywords:  International prognostic scoring system; Leukemic transformation; Myelodysplastic syndrome

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28497239     DOI: 10.1007/s12185-017-2250-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hematol        ISSN: 0925-5710            Impact factor:   2.490


  20 in total

1.  Validation of the revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a report from the prospective European LeukaemiaNet MDS (EUMDS) registry.

Authors:  Louise de Swart; Alex Smith; Thomas W Johnston; Detlef Haase; Jackie Droste; Pierre Fenaux; Argiris Symeonidis; Guillermo Sanz; Eva Hellström-Lindberg; Jaroslav Cermák; Ulrich Germing; Reinhard Stauder; Otilia Georgescu; Marius MacKenzie; Luca Malcovati; Mette S Holm; Antonio M Almeida; Krzysztof Mądry; Borhane Slama; Agnes Guerci-Bresler; Laurence Sanhes; Odile Beyne-Rauzy; Elisa Luño; David Bowen; Theo de Witte
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  International prognostic scoring system and other prognostic systems for myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  C L Balduini; R Guarnone; A Pecci; E Centenara; E Ascari
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Myelodysplastic syndromes: therapy and outlook.

Authors:  Roger M Lyons
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Validation of the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Aleksandar Savic; Dragomir Marisavljevic; Vanja Kvrgic; Natasa Stanisavljevic
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.195

5.  Improved risk stratification by the integration of the revised international prognostic scoring system with the myelodysplastic syndromes comorbidity index.

Authors:  M F van Spronsen; G J Ossenkoppele; R Holman; A A van de Loosdrecht
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) predicts survival and leukemic evolution of myelodysplastic syndromes significantly better than IPSS and WHO Prognostic Scoring System: validation by the Gruppo Romano Mielodisplasie Italian Regional Database.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Voso; Susanna Fenu; Roberto Latagliata; Francesco Buccisano; Alfonso Piciocchi; Maria Antonietta Aloe-Spiriti; Massimo Breccia; Marianna Criscuolo; Alessandro Andriani; Stefano Mancini; Pasquale Niscola; Virginia Naso; Carolina Nobile; Anna Lina Piccioni; Mariella D'Andrea; Ada D'Addosio; Giuseppe Leone; Adriano Venditti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Prognostic models in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Rafael Bejar
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2013

8.  Proposal for refining the definition of dysgranulopoiesis in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Jean E Goasguen; John M Bennett; Barbara J Bain; Richard Brunning; Maria-Teresa Vallespi; Masao Tomonaga; Gina Zini; Alain Renault
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 3.156

Review 9.  The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes.

Authors:  James W Vardiman; Jüergen Thiele; Daniel A Arber; Richard D Brunning; Michael J Borowitz; Anna Porwit; Nancy Lee Harris; Michelle M Le Beau; Eva Hellström-Lindberg; Ayalew Tefferi; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Proposal for a new risk model in myelodysplastic syndrome that accounts for events not considered in the original International Prognostic Scoring System.

Authors:  Hagop Kantarjian; Susan O'Brien; Farhad Ravandi; Jorge Cortes; Jianqin Shan; John M Bennett; Alan List; Pierre Fenaux; Guillermo Sanz; Jean-Pierre Issa; Emil J Freireich; Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  6 in total

1.  Conditioning regimen with a 75% dose of standard busulfan/cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine before cord blood transplantation in older patients with AML and MDS.

Authors:  Takanori Ohta; Yasuhiro Sugio; Hiroshi Imanaga; Seidou Oku; Yuju Ohno
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Serum ferritin levels at diagnosis predict prognosis in patients with low blast count myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kawabata; Kensuke Usuki; Maki Shindo-Ueda; Junya Kanda; Kaoru Tohyama; Akira Matsuda; Kayano Araseki; Tomoko Hata; Takahiro Suzuki; Hidekazu Kayano; Kei Shimbo; Shigeru Chiba; Takayuki Ishikawa; Nobuyoshi Arima; Masaharu Nohgawa; Yasushi Miyazaki; Mineo Kurokawa; Shunya Arai; Kinuko Mitani; Akifumi Takaori-Kondo
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Impact of splicing factor mutations on clinical features in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Naoki Shingai; Yuka Harada; Hiroko Iizuka; Yosuke Ogata; Noriko Doki; Kazuteru Ohashi; Masao Hagihara; Norio Komatsu; Hironori Harada
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  PAS positivity of erythroid precursor cells is associated with a poor prognosis in newly diagnosed myelodysplastic syndrome patients.

Authors:  Kenta Masuda; Shuichi Shiga; Hiroshi Kawabata; Akifumi Takaori-Kondo; Satoshi Ichiyama; Yasuhiko Kamikubo
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 5.  Improving Treatment for Myelodysplastic Syndromes Patients.

Authors:  Julia Montoro; Aslihan Yerlikaya; Abdullah Ali; Azra Raza
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-10-25

6.  Gender disparity in the survival of patients with primary myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Fangfang Wang; Jun Ni; Lei Wu; Ying Wang; Bin He; Duonan Yu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.207

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.