Literature DB >> 24236698

Acoustic noise improves visual perception and modulates occipital oscillatory states.

Stephanie Gleiss1, Christoph Kayser.   

Abstract

Perception is a multisensory process, and previous work has shown that multisensory interactions occur not only for object-related stimuli but also for simplistic and apparently unrelated inputs to the different senses. We here compare the facilitation of visual perception induced by transient (target-synchronized) sounds to the facilitation provided by continuous background noise like sounds. Specifically, we show that continuous acoustic noise improves visual contrast detection by systematically shifting psychometric curves in an amplitude-dependent manner. This multisensory benefit was found to be both qualitatively and quantitatively similar to that induced by a transient and target synchronized sound in the same paradigm. Studying the underlying neural mechanisms using electric neuroimaging (EEG), we found that acoustic noise alters occipital alpha (8-12 Hz) power and decreases beta-band (14-20 Hz) coupling of occipital and temporal sites. Task-irrelevant and continuous sounds thereby have an amplitude-dependent effect on cortical mechanisms implicated in shaping visual cortical excitability. The same oscillatory mechanisms also mediate visual facilitation by transient sounds, and our results suggest that task-related sounds and task-irrelevant background noises could induce perceptually and mechanistically similar enhancement of visual perception. Given the omnipresence of sounds and noises in our environment, such multisensory interactions may affect perception in many everyday scenarios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24236698     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  19 in total

1.  Effect of mechanical tactile noise on amplitude of visual evoked potentials: multisensory stochastic resonance.

Authors:  Ignacio Méndez-Balbuena; Nayeli Huidobro; Mayte Silva; Amira Flores; Carlos Trenado; Luis Quintanar; Oscar Arias-Carrión; Rumyana Kristeva; Elias Manjarrez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Oscillatory Properties of Functional Connections Between Sensory Areas Mediate Cross-Modal Illusory Perception.

Authors:  Jason Cooke; Claudia Poch; Helge Gillmeister; Marcello Costantini; Vincenzo Romei
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Audiovisual Modulation in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex Depends on Cross-Modal Stimulus Configuration and Congruency.

Authors:  Guido T Meijer; Jorrit S Montijn; Cyriel M A Pennartz; Carien S Lansink
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The intraparietal sulcus governs multisensory integration of audiovisual information based on task difficulty.

Authors:  Christina Regenbogen; Janina Seubert; Emilia Johansson; Andreas Finkelmeyer; Patrik Andersson; Johan N Lundström
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Novel names extend for how long preschool children sample visual information.

Authors:  Paulo F Carvalho; Catarina Vales; Caitlin M Fausey; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-12-26

6.  Acoustic Stimuli Can Improve and Impair Somatosensory Perception.

Authors:  Matthias Nuernberger; Denise Schaller; Carsten Klingner; Otto Witte; Stefan Brodoehl
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.152

7.  Crossmodal integration improves sensory detection thresholds in the ferret.

Authors:  Karl J Hollensteiner; Florian Pieper; Gerhard Engler; Peter König; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sound can suppress visual perception.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Masakazu Ide
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Differential effects of white noise in cognitive and perceptual tasks.

Authors:  Nora A Herweg; Nico Bunzeck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-03

10.  Comparison of informational vs. energetic masking effects on speechreading performance.

Authors:  Björn Lidestam; Johan Holgersson; Shahram Moradi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.