Literature DB >> 24236668

Spine surgery referrals redirected through a multidisciplinary care pathway: effects of nonsurgeon triage including MRI utilization.

Danica R Kindrachuk1, Daryl R Fourney.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The Saskatchewan Spine Pathway (SSP) was introduced to improve quality and access to care for patients with low-back and leg pain in the province. There is very limited data regarding the efficacy of nonsurgeon triage of surgical referrals. The objective of this early implementation study was to determine how the SSP affects utilization of MRI and spine surgery.
METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 87 consecutive patients with low-back and leg pain who were initially referred to a spine surgeon but were instead redirected to the SSP clinic between May 1, 2011, and November 30, 2011. The SSP clinic triaged patients into 2 groups: Group A (nonsurgical management) and Group B (referred back to the spine surgeon). The SSP classification was modified from the classification proposed by Hall et al. Pain and disability were scored by pain-related visual analog scale, modified Oswestry Disability Index, and EuroQol-5D.
RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (Group A, 71.3%) were discharged after patient education, self-care advice, and/or referral for additional mechanical therapies. Although only 25 patients (Group B, 28.7%) were directed back to the surgeon, the final percentage (12.6%) offered surgery was similar to that of historic controls (15%). Total MRI utilization was significantly lower in Group A (25.8%) than Group B (92.0%) (p < 0.0001). Nonsurgeon triage captured all red flags detected by the surgeon. Patients in Group B were much more likely to have a leg-dominant pain (p = 0.0088) and had significantly higher Oswestry Disability Index (p = 0.0121) and EuroQol-5D mobility (p = 0.0484) scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The SSP significantly reduced MRI utilization and referrals seen by the surgeon for nonoperative care. Although this early implementation study suggests potential for cost savings, a more rigorous analysis of outcomes, costs, and patient satisfaction is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24236668     DOI: 10.3171/2013.10.SPINE13434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  10 in total

1.  Improving spine surgical access, appropriateness and efficiency in metropolitan, urban and rural settings.

Authors:  Mohammad Zarrabian; Andrew Bidos; Caroline Fanti; Barry Young; Brian Drew; David Puskas; Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Evaluation of an advanced-practice physiotherapist in triaging patients with lumbar spine pain: surgeon-physiotherapist level of agreement and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Susan Robarts; Paul Stratford; Deborah Kennedy; Barry Malcolm; Joel Finkelstein
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Clinical pathways for the management of low back pain from primary to specialised care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cathriona Murphy; Helen French; Geraldine McCarthy; Caitriona Cunningham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  Nerve root sedimentation sign on MRI: A triage screen for leg dominant symptoms?

Authors:  Zachary Huschi; Laura Neuburger; Syed Uzair Ahmed; Yanzhao Cheng; Daryl R Fourney
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Requesting spinal MRIs effectively from primary care referrals.

Authors:  Ignatius Liew; Fraser Dean; Gillian Anderson; Odhrán Murray
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Does changed referral options affect the use of MRI for patients with low back pain? Evidence from a natural experiment using nationwide data.

Authors:  Morten Sall Jensen; Kim Rose Olsen; Lars Morsø; Jens Søndergaard; Berit Schiøttz-Christensen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Clinician education unlikely effective for guideline-adherent medication prescription in low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

Authors:  Daniel L Belavy; Scott D Tagliaferri; Paul Buntine; Tobias Saueressig; Kate Sadler; Christy Ko; Clint T Miller; Patrick J Owen
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-01-03

8.  Management of Low back pain in Saudi Arabia healthcare system. A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Ahmed S Alhowimel; Faris A Alodaibi; Mazyad A Alotaibi; Dalyah M Alamam; Julie Fritz
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 9.  Classification of patients with low back-related leg pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Siobhán Stynes; Kika Konstantinou; Kate M Dunn
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Is establishing a specialist back pain assessment and management service in primary care a safe and effective model? Twelve-month results from the Back pain Assessment Clinic (BAC) prospective cohort pilot study.

Authors:  John H Y Moi; Uyen Phan; Adam de Gruchy; Danny Liew; Tanya I Yuen; John E Cunningham; Ian P Wicks
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.